Hi,
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
wrote:
>>> Let's fix the return type of all of the current of_map_mode()
>>> functions. While we're at it, we'll remove one pointless "inline".
>>
>> Ah, I see... the thing here is that the mode is always an unsigned int
>> since it
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 7:22 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:12:04AM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
>> In of_get_regulation_constraints() it can clearly be seen that the
>> return value of of_map_mode() is assigned to a signed integer. This
>> is important because the first thi
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:12:04AM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> In of_get_regulation_constraints() it can clearly be seen that the
> return value of of_map_mode() is assigned to a signed integer. This
> is important because the first thing the regulator core does with this
> value is to compar
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:12:04AM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> In of_get_regulation_constraints() it can clearly be seen that the
> return value of of_map_mode() is assigned to a signed integer. This
> is important because the first thing the regulator core does with this
> value is to compar
In of_get_regulation_constraints() it can clearly be seen that the
return value of of_map_mode() is assigned to a signed integer. This
is important because the first thing the regulator core does with this
value is to compare it to -EINVAL.
Let's fix the return type of all of the current of_map_m
5 matches
Mail list logo