Re: [PATCH] x86/fixup_irq: using the cpu_online_mask instead of cpu_all_mask

2012-08-19 Thread Yanmin Zhang
On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 06:55 +, Liu, Chuansheng wrote: > From: liu chuansheng > Subject: [PATCH] x86/fixup_irq: using the cpu_online_mask instead of > cpu_all_mask > > When one CPU is going down, and this CPU is the last one in irq affinity, > current code is setting cpu_a

Re: [PATCH] x86/fixup_irq: using the cpu_online_mask instead of cpu_all_mask

2012-08-19 Thread Yanmin Zhang
On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 06:55 +, Liu, Chuansheng wrote: From: liu chuansheng chuansheng@intel.com Subject: [PATCH] x86/fixup_irq: using the cpu_online_mask instead of cpu_all_mask When one CPU is going down, and this CPU is the last one in irq affinity, current code is setting

[PATCH] x86/fixup_irq: using the cpu_online_mask instead of cpu_all_mask

2012-08-14 Thread Liu, Chuansheng
From: liu chuansheng Subject: [PATCH] x86/fixup_irq: using the cpu_online_mask instead of cpu_all_mask When one CPU is going down, and this CPU is the last one in irq affinity, current code is setting cpu_all_mask as the new affinity for that irq. But for some system the firmware maybe send

[PATCH] x86/fixup_irq: using the cpu_online_mask instead of cpu_all_mask

2012-08-14 Thread Liu, Chuansheng
From: liu chuansheng chuansheng@intel.com Subject: [PATCH] x86/fixup_irq: using the cpu_online_mask instead of cpu_all_mask When one CPU is going down, and this CPU is the last one in irq affinity, current code is setting cpu_all_mask as the new affinity for that irq. But for some system