On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 06:55 +, Liu, Chuansheng wrote:
> From: liu chuansheng
> Subject: [PATCH] x86/fixup_irq: using the cpu_online_mask instead of
> cpu_all_mask
>
> When one CPU is going down, and this CPU is the last one in irq affinity,
> current code is setting cpu_a
On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 06:55 +, Liu, Chuansheng wrote:
From: liu chuansheng chuansheng@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH] x86/fixup_irq: using the cpu_online_mask instead of
cpu_all_mask
When one CPU is going down, and this CPU is the last one in irq affinity,
current code is setting
From: liu chuansheng
Subject: [PATCH] x86/fixup_irq: using the cpu_online_mask instead of
cpu_all_mask
When one CPU is going down, and this CPU is the last one in irq affinity,
current code is setting cpu_all_mask as the new affinity for that irq.
But for some system the firmware maybe send
From: liu chuansheng chuansheng@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH] x86/fixup_irq: using the cpu_online_mask instead of
cpu_all_mask
When one CPU is going down, and this CPU is the last one in irq affinity,
current code is setting cpu_all_mask as the new affinity for that irq.
But for some system
4 matches
Mail list logo