* Hiraku Toyooka wrote:
> Steven,
>
> (03/08/2013 12:34 AM), Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >The second patch, returns success on a reset of the buffer even if
> >the buffer wasn't allocated. Returning -EINVAL is just confusing.
>
> I realized we should update the snapshot documentation together
* Hiraku Toyooka hiraku.toyooka...@hitachi.com wrote:
Steven,
(03/08/2013 12:34 AM), Steven Rostedt wrote:
The second patch, returns success on a reset of the buffer even if
the buffer wasn't allocated. Returning -EINVAL is just confusing.
I realized we should update the snapshot
Steven,
(03/08/2013 12:34 AM), Steven Rostedt wrote:
The second patch, returns success on a reset of the buffer even if
the buffer wasn't allocated. Returning -EINVAL is just confusing.
I realized we should update the snapshot documentation together with
this change.
I attached a patch to
Ingo,
The snapshot feature has been added in the 3.9 merge window. But after
playing with it some more, I've come to realize that it needs a
self documenting help (I had to look at the code a few times to remember
how to use it, or look in Documentation), and it also gives an awkward
error code
Steven,
(03/08/2013 12:34 AM), Steven Rostedt wrote:
The second patch, returns success on a reset of the buffer even if
the buffer wasn't allocated. Returning -EINVAL is just confusing.
I realized we should update the snapshot documentation together with
this change.
I attached a patch to
Ingo,
The snapshot feature has been added in the 3.9 merge window. But after
playing with it some more, I've come to realize that it needs a
self documenting help (I had to look at the code a few times to remember
how to use it, or look in Documentation), and it also gives an awkward
error code
6 matches
Mail list logo
