On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 01:33:31AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Thursday 24 March 2005 02:24, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 03:16:24AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 14:38:50 MST, Frank Sorenson said:
> > > > Okay, I replaced the sysfs_ops with ops of m
On Thursday 24 March 2005 02:24, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 03:16:24AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 14:38:50 MST, Frank Sorenson said:
> > > Okay, I replaced the sysfs_ops with ops of my own, and now all the show
> > > and store functions also accept the nam
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 00:00:48 -0800, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 02:39:32AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Thursday 24 March 2005 02:25, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 01:40:48AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 16 March 2005 16:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 02:39:32AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Thursday 24 March 2005 02:25, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 01:40:48AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 16 March 2005 16:38, Frank Sorenson wrote:
> > > > Okay, I replaced the sysfs_ops with ops of my
On Thursday 24 March 2005 02:25, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 01:40:48AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Wednesday 16 March 2005 16:38, Frank Sorenson wrote:
> > > Okay, I replaced the sysfs_ops with ops of my own, and now all the show
> > > and store functions also accept the name
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 01:40:48AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 March 2005 16:38, Frank Sorenson wrote:
> > Okay, I replaced the sysfs_ops with ops of my own, and now all the show
> > and store functions also accept the name of the attribute as a parameter.
> > This lets the func
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 03:16:24AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 14:38:50 MST, Frank Sorenson said:
> > Okay, I replaced the sysfs_ops with ops of my own, and now all the show
> > and store functions also accept the name of the attribute as a parameter.
> > This lets the fun
On Monday 21 March 2005 17:53, Frank Sorenson wrote:
> Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > I have implemented arrays of groups of attributes:
>
> Works great here. The i8k-cumulative patch claimed to be malformed, but
> I merged it in just fine by hand. In arch/i386/kernel/dmi_scan.c, I had
> to EXPORT d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> I have implemented arrays of groups of attributes:
Works great here. The i8k-cumulative patch claimed to be malformed, but
I merged it in just fine by hand. In arch/i386/kernel/dmi_scan.c, I had
to EXPORT dmi_get_system_info
Hi,
On Thursday 17 March 2005 04:46, Frank Sorenson wrote:
> Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> | Hrm, can we be a little more explicit and not poke in the sysfs guts right
> | in the driver? What do you think about the patch below athat implements
> | "attribute arrays"? And I am attaching cumulative i8k p
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 02:37:56 -0700, Frank Sorenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1: My Inspiron 9200 (and perhaps others) doesn't seem to respond to the
> I8K_SMM_BIOS_VERSION function call, so it fails the check in i8k_probe.
> ~ The check of i8k_get_bios_version doesn't seem critical, and removin
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 14:38:50 MST, Frank Sorenson said:
> Okay, I replaced the sysfs_ops with ops of my own, and now all the show
> and store functions also accept the name of the attribute as a parameter.
> This lets the functions know what attribute is being accessed, and allows
> us to create att
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
| Hrm, can we be a little more explicit and not poke in the sysfs guts right
| in the driver? What do you think about the patch below athat implements
| "attribute arrays"? And I am attaching cumulative i8k patch using these
| arr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
| Hrm, can we be a little more explicit and not poke in the sysfs guts right
| in the driver? What do you think about the patch below athat implements
| "attribute arrays"? And I am attaching cumulative i8k patch using these
| arr
On Wednesday 16 March 2005 16:38, Frank Sorenson wrote:
> Okay, I replaced the sysfs_ops with ops of my own, and now all the show
> and store functions also accept the name of the attribute as a parameter.
> This lets the functions know what attribute is being accessed, and allows
> us to create at
Okay, I replaced the sysfs_ops with ops of my own, and now all the show
and store functions also accept the name of the attribute as a parameter.
This lets the functions know what attribute is being accessed, and allows
us to create attributes that share show and store functions, so things
don't ne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Well, (a) the next rev of the patch will hopefully provide more access to the
> second thermal probe than just detecting its existence (it still doesn't do
> the sysfs or whatever magic to make the actual value accessible), a
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 11:59:22 +0100, Giuseppe Bilotta said:
> > According to your patch, the C840 has 2 temp sensors. I'll have to figure
> > out what the second one is (prob either the GPU or the disk drive?)
>
> If it runs over 40 C easily it's probably the GPU :)
Well, (a) the next rev of the p
> According to your patch, the C840 has 2 temp sensors. I'll have to figure
> out what the second one is (prob either the GPU or the disk drive?)
If it runs over 40 C easily it's probably the GPU :)
--
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta
Can't you see
It all makes perfect sense
Expressed in dollar and c
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 20:41:14 MST, Frank Sorenson said:
> These patches look pretty good. A few comments (with a patch--tested on
> my Inspiron 9200):
I tested your patch on top of Dmitry's on a Dell Latitude C840, seems to work.
> - - Some of the Dell motherboards provide more than 1 temperatur
On Saturday 12 March 2005 22:41, Frank Sorenson wrote:
> Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> | Hi,
> |
> | here are some changes that freshen I8K driver (Dell Inspiron/Latitude
> | platform driver). The patches have been tested on Inspiron 8100.
>
> | Please consider for inclusion.
> |
> | Thanks!
>
> These
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
| Hi,
|
| here are some changes that freshen I8K driver (Dell Inspiron/Latitude
| platform driver). The patches have been tested on Inspiron 8100.
| Please consider for inclusion.
|
| Thanks!
These patches look pretty good. A fe
Hi,
here are some changes that freshen I8K driver (Dell Inspiron/Latitude
platform driver). The patches have been tested on Inspiron 8100.
i8k-lindent.patch
- pass the driver through Lindent to comply with CondingStyle requirements
(4 spaces vs. TAB indentation)
i8k-use-dmi.patch
- use standar
23 matches
Mail list logo
