Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:35:16 +1100
NeilBrown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+ for (i = conf->raid_disks ; i-- ; ) {
That statement should be dragged out, shot, stomped on then ceremonially
incinerated.
What's wrong with doing
for (i = 0; i <
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:39:56 +1100 Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I must right code that Andrew can read.
That's write.
But more importantly, things that people can immediately see and understand
help reduce the possibility of mistakes. Now and in the
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:39:56 +1100 Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I must right code that Andrew can read.
That's write.
But more importantly, things that people can immediately see and understand
help reduce the possibility of mistakes. Now and in the
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:35:16 +1100
NeilBrown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ for (i = conf-raid_disks ; i-- ; ) {
That statement should be dragged out, shot, stomped on then ceremonially
incinerated.
What's wrong with doing
for (i = 0; i
> From: Neil Brown
> Newsgroups: gmane.linux.raid,gmane.linux.kernel
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 006 of 6] md: Add support for reshape of a raid6
> Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:39:56 +1100
[]
> I guess... "Egoless programmer" and all that, "write for others to
> read, not for the compiler",
Few years
From: Neil Brown
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.raid,gmane.linux.kernel
Subject: Re: [PATCH 006 of 6] md: Add support for reshape of a raid6
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:39:56 +1100
[]
I guess... Egoless programmer and all that, write for others to
read, not for the compiler,
Few years back on AVR
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:39:56 +1100 Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I must right code that Andrew can read.
That's write.
But more importantly, things that people can immediately see and understand
help reduce the possibility of mistakes. Now and in the future.
If we did all loops like
On Wednesday February 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:35:16 +1100
> NeilBrown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > + for (i = conf->raid_disks ; i-- ; ) {
>
> That statement should be dragged out, shot, stomped on then ceremonially
> incinerated.
An experiment in
On Thursday, 22 February 2007 00:58, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 00:36:22 +0100
> Oleg Verych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > From: Andrew Morton
> > > Newsgroups: gmane.linux.raid,gmane.linux.kernel
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 006 of 6] md: Add support for reshape of a raid6
> >
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 00:36:22 +0100
Oleg Verych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: Andrew Morton
> > Newsgroups: gmane.linux.raid,gmane.linux.kernel
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 006 of 6] md: Add support for reshape of a raid6
> > Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:48:06 -0800
>
> Hallo.
>
> > On Tue, 20
> From: Andrew Morton
> Newsgroups: gmane.linux.raid,gmane.linux.kernel
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 006 of 6] md: Add support for reshape of a raid6
> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:48:06 -0800
Hallo.
> On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:35:16 +1100
> NeilBrown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> +for (i =
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:35:16 +1100
NeilBrown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> + for (i = conf->raid_disks ; i-- ; ) {
That statement should be dragged out, shot, stomped on then ceremonially
incinerated.
What's wrong with doing
for (i = 0; i < conf->raid_disks; i++) {
in a
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:35:16 +1100
NeilBrown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ for (i = conf-raid_disks ; i-- ; ) {
That statement should be dragged out, shot, stomped on then ceremonially
incinerated.
What's wrong with doing
for (i = 0; i conf-raid_disks; i++) {
in a manner
From: Andrew Morton
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.raid,gmane.linux.kernel
Subject: Re: [PATCH 006 of 6] md: Add support for reshape of a raid6
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:48:06 -0800
Hallo.
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:35:16 +1100
NeilBrown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+for (i =
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 00:36:22 +0100
Oleg Verych [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Andrew Morton
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.raid,gmane.linux.kernel
Subject: Re: [PATCH 006 of 6] md: Add support for reshape of a raid6
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:48:06 -0800
Hallo.
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:35:16
On Thursday, 22 February 2007 00:58, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 00:36:22 +0100
Oleg Verych [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Andrew Morton
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.raid,gmane.linux.kernel
Subject: Re: [PATCH 006 of 6] md: Add support for reshape of a raid6
Date: Wed, 21
On Wednesday February 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:35:16 +1100
NeilBrown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ for (i = conf-raid_disks ; i-- ; ) {
That statement should be dragged out, shot, stomped on then ceremonially
incinerated.
An experiment in lateral
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:39:56 +1100 Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I must right code that Andrew can read.
That's write.
But more importantly, things that people can immediately see and understand
help reduce the possibility of mistakes. Now and in the future.
If we did all loops like
i.e. one or more drives can be added and the array will re-stripe
while on-line.
Most of the interesting work was already done for raid5.
This just extends it to raid6.
mdadm newer than 2.6 is needed for complete safety, however any
version of mdadm which support raid5 reshape will do a good
i.e. one or more drives can be added and the array will re-stripe
while on-line.
Most of the interesting work was already done for raid5.
This just extends it to raid6.
mdadm newer than 2.6 is needed for complete safety, however any
version of mdadm which support raid5 reshape will do a good
20 matches
Mail list logo
