On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 08:57:54PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Currently kswapd queues dirty pages for writeback if scanning at an elevated
> priority but the priority kswapd scans at is not related to the number
> of unqueued dirty encountered. Since commit "mm: vmscan: Flatten kswapd
> priority
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 08:57:54PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
Currently kswapd queues dirty pages for writeback if scanning at an elevated
priority but the priority kswapd scans at is not related to the number
of unqueued dirty encountered. Since commit mm: vmscan: Flatten kswapd
priority loop,
On 04/09/2013 07:07 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
Currently kswapd queues dirty pages for writeback if scanning at an elevated
priority but the priority kswapd scans at is not related to the number
of unqueued dirty encountered. Since commit "mm: vmscan: Flatten kswapd
priority loop", the priority is
Currently kswapd queues dirty pages for writeback if scanning at an elevated
priority but the priority kswapd scans at is not related to the number
of unqueued dirty encountered. Since commit "mm: vmscan: Flatten kswapd
priority loop", the priority is related to the size of the LRU and the
zone
Currently kswapd queues dirty pages for writeback if scanning at an elevated
priority but the priority kswapd scans at is not related to the number
of unqueued dirty encountered. Since commit mm: vmscan: Flatten kswapd
priority loop, the priority is related to the size of the LRU and the
zone
On 04/09/2013 07:07 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
Currently kswapd queues dirty pages for writeback if scanning at an elevated
priority but the priority kswapd scans at is not related to the number
of unqueued dirty encountered. Since commit mm: vmscan: Flatten kswapd
priority loop, the priority is
Currently kswapd queues dirty pages for writeback if scanning at an elevated
priority but the priority kswapd scans at is not related to the number
of unqueued dirty encountered. Since commit "mm: vmscan: Flatten kswapd
priority loop", the priority is related to the size of the LRU and the
zone
Currently kswapd queues dirty pages for writeback if scanning at an elevated
priority but the priority kswapd scans at is not related to the number
of unqueued dirty encountered. Since commit mm: vmscan: Flatten kswapd
priority loop, the priority is related to the size of the LRU and the
zone
On 03/21/2013 02:15 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 01:53:41PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
On 03/17/2013 11:11 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 07:42:39AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
Mel Gorman writes:
@@ -495,6 +495,9 @@ typedef enum {
ZONE_CONGESTED,
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 01:53:41PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On 03/17/2013 11:11 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> >On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 07:42:39AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >>Mel Gorman writes:
> >>
> >>>@@ -495,6 +495,9 @@ typedef enum {
> >>> ZONE_CONGESTED, /* zone has many
On 03/17/2013 11:11 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 07:42:39AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
Mel Gorman writes:
@@ -495,6 +495,9 @@ typedef enum {
ZONE_CONGESTED, /* zone has many dirty pages backed by
* a congested
On 03/17/2013 11:11 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 07:42:39AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
Mel Gorman mgor...@suse.de writes:
@@ -495,6 +495,9 @@ typedef enum {
ZONE_CONGESTED, /* zone has many dirty pages backed by
*
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 01:53:41PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
On 03/17/2013 11:11 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 07:42:39AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
Mel Gorman mgor...@suse.de writes:
@@ -495,6 +495,9 @@ typedef enum {
ZONE_CONGESTED, /* zone has many dirty
On 03/21/2013 02:15 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 01:53:41PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
On 03/17/2013 11:11 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 07:42:39AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
Mel Gorman mgor...@suse.de writes:
@@ -495,6 +495,9 @@ typedef enum {
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 07:08:50PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> >@@ -2735,8 +2748,12 @@ static unsigned long balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat,
> >int order,
> > end_zone = i;
> > break;
> > } else {
> >-
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 07:08:50PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
@@ -2735,8 +2748,12 @@ static unsigned long balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat,
int order,
end_zone = i;
break;
} else {
-/* If
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 07:42:39AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Mel Gorman writes:
>
> > @@ -495,6 +495,9 @@ typedef enum {
> > ZONE_CONGESTED, /* zone has many dirty pages backed by
> > * a congested BDI
> >
Mel Gorman writes:
> @@ -495,6 +495,9 @@ typedef enum {
> ZONE_CONGESTED, /* zone has many dirty pages backed by
>* a congested BDI
>*/
> + ZONE_DIRTY, /* reclaim
Currently kswapd queues dirty pages for writeback if scanning at an elevated
priority but the priority kswapd scans at is not related to the number
of unqueued dirty encountered. Since commit "mm: vmscan: Flatten kswapd
priority loop", the priority is related to the size of the LRU and the
zone
Currently kswapd queues dirty pages for writeback if scanning at an elevated
priority but the priority kswapd scans at is not related to the number
of unqueued dirty encountered. Since commit mm: vmscan: Flatten kswapd
priority loop, the priority is related to the size of the LRU and the
zone
Mel Gorman mgor...@suse.de writes:
@@ -495,6 +495,9 @@ typedef enum {
ZONE_CONGESTED, /* zone has many dirty pages backed by
* a congested BDI
*/
+ ZONE_DIRTY, /*
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 07:42:39AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
Mel Gorman mgor...@suse.de writes:
@@ -495,6 +495,9 @@ typedef enum {
ZONE_CONGESTED, /* zone has many dirty pages backed by
* a congested BDI
22 matches
Mail list logo
