Re: [PATCH 06/14] regulator: axp20x: add software based soft_start for AXP209 LDO3

2018-12-04 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 01:31:44PM +, Priit Laes wrote: > Yes, makes sense. Although, should we then also distinguish between > regulators which support soft-start in hardware and devices which emulate > it by delay, like in this case? Drivers should not be emulating soft start, if they need

Re: [PATCH 06/14] regulator: axp20x: add software based soft_start for AXP209 LDO3

2018-12-04 Thread Priit Laes
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 10:36:19AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 05:27:47PM +0200, Priit Laes wrote: > > From: Olliver Schinagl > > > > In the past, there have been words on various lists that if LDO3 is > > disabled in u-boot, but enabled in the DTS, the axp209 driver wou

Re: [PATCH 06/14] regulator: axp20x: add software based soft_start for AXP209 LDO3

2018-11-27 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 05:27:47PM +0200, Priit Laes wrote: > From: Olliver Schinagl > > In the past, there have been words on various lists that if LDO3 is > disabled in u-boot, but enabled in the DTS, the axp209 driver would > fail to continue/hang. Several enable/disable patches have been > is

[PATCH 06/14] regulator: axp20x: add software based soft_start for AXP209 LDO3

2018-11-26 Thread Priit Laes
From: Olliver Schinagl In the past, there have been words on various lists that if LDO3 is disabled in u-boot, but enabled in the DTS, the axp209 driver would fail to continue/hang. Several enable/disable patches have been issues to devicetree's in both the kernel and u-boot to address this issue