On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 12:48 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 04:07:58PM -0700, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> If you're adding and then removing *all* of them in this set,
>> why add them in the first place?
>
> So that there's no breakage during bisection.
>
> You should be able to
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 12:48 AM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 04:07:58PM -0700, Linus Walleij wrote:
If you're adding and then removing *all* of them in this set,
why add them in the first place?
So that there's no breakage during bisection.
You should be
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 04:07:58PM -0700, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:13:49PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >>
> >> > We've done this before and it worked well last
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 04:07:58PM -0700, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:13:49PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
We've done this
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:13:49PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>
>> > We've done this before and it worked well last time. Here we're
>> > duplicating a complex registration function to ease
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:13:49PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
We've done this before and it worked well last time. Here we're
duplicating a complex
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:13:49PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > We've done this before and it worked well last time. Here we're
> > duplicating a complex registration function to ease the process
> > of enabling it for Device Tree. As there
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:13:49PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
We've done this before and it worked well last time. Here we're
duplicating a complex registration function to ease the process
of enabling it for Device
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> We've done this before and it worked well last time. Here we're
> duplicating a complex registration function to ease the process
> of enabling it for Device Tree. As there are quite a few steps
> taken during the registration process, it makes
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
We've done this before and it worked well last time. Here we're
duplicating a complex registration function to ease the process
of enabling it for Device Tree. As there are quite a few steps
taken during the registration
We've done this before and it worked well last time. Here we're
duplicating a complex registration function to ease the process
of enabling it for Device Tree. As there are quite a few steps
taken during the registration process, it makes sense to break
them up into more manageable chunks. This
We've done this before and it worked well last time. Here we're
duplicating a complex registration function to ease the process
of enabling it for Device Tree. As there are quite a few steps
taken during the registration process, it makes sense to break
them up into more manageable chunks. This
12 matches
Mail list logo
