On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 03:10:57PM -0600, David Fries wrote:
> That's 1 through 14, and 16. Patch 15 was in my tree from another developer,
> "drivers/w1/masters/w1-gpio.c: add strong pullup emulation"
> and wasn't included in what I submitted. Should I repost the series
> in sequence?
Please
That's 1 through 14, and 16. Patch 15 was in my tree from another developer,
"drivers/w1/masters/w1-gpio.c: add strong pullup emulation"
and wasn't included in what I submitted. Should I repost the series
in sequence?
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:58:02AM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> Hi
>
>
Hi
15.01.2014, 08:52, "David Fries" :
> The bus_mutex needs to be taken to serialize access to a specific bus.
> netlink wasn't updated when bus_mutex was added and was calling
> without that lock held, and not all of the masters were holding the
> bus_mutex in a search. This was causing the
Hi
15.01.2014, 08:52, David Fries da...@fries.net:
The bus_mutex needs to be taken to serialize access to a specific bus.
netlink wasn't updated when bus_mutex was added and was calling
without that lock held, and not all of the masters were holding the
bus_mutex in a search. This was
That's 1 through 14, and 16. Patch 15 was in my tree from another developer,
drivers/w1/masters/w1-gpio.c: add strong pullup emulation
and wasn't included in what I submitted. Should I repost the series
in sequence?
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:58:02AM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
Hi
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 03:10:57PM -0600, David Fries wrote:
That's 1 through 14, and 16. Patch 15 was in my tree from another developer,
drivers/w1/masters/w1-gpio.c: add strong pullup emulation
and wasn't included in what I submitted. Should I repost the series
in sequence?
Please resend
The bus_mutex needs to be taken to serialize access to a specific bus.
netlink wasn't updated when bus_mutex was added and was calling
without that lock held, and not all of the masters were holding the
bus_mutex in a search. This was causing the ds2490 hardware to stop
responding when both
The bus_mutex needs to be taken to serialize access to a specific bus.
netlink wasn't updated when bus_mutex was added and was calling
without that lock held, and not all of the masters were holding the
bus_mutex in a search. This was causing the ds2490 hardware to stop
responding when both
8 matches
Mail list logo
