Re: [PATCH 2/3] regulator: dbx500: use seq_puts() instead of seq_printf()

2014-03-18 Thread Jingoo Han
On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 10:21 AM, Jingoo Han wrote: > > For a constant format without additional arguments, use seq_puts() > instead of seq_printf(). Also, it fixes the following checkpatch > warning. > > WARNING: Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf > > Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han > --- >

Re: [PATCH 2/3] regulator: dbx500: use seq_puts() instead of seq_printf()

2014-03-18 Thread Jingoo Han
On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 10:21 AM, Jingoo Han wrote: For a constant format without additional arguments, use seq_puts() instead of seq_printf(). Also, it fixes the following checkpatch warning. WARNING: Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han jg1@samsung.com

[PATCH 2/3] regulator: dbx500: use seq_puts() instead of seq_printf()

2014-02-25 Thread Jingoo Han
For a constant format without additional arguments, use seq_puts() instead of seq_printf(). Also, it fixes the following checkpatch warning. WARNING: Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han --- drivers/regulator/dbx500-prcmu.c | 10 +- 1 file changed, 5

[PATCH 2/3] regulator: dbx500: use seq_puts() instead of seq_printf()

2014-02-25 Thread Jingoo Han
For a constant format without additional arguments, use seq_puts() instead of seq_printf(). Also, it fixes the following checkpatch warning. WARNING: Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han jg1@samsung.com --- drivers/regulator/dbx500-prcmu.c | 10 +- 1 file