Hi Sebastian,
On 06.12.2018 00:40, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 06:23:40PM +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>> On 07/11/2018 14:54:17+, claudiu.bez...@microchip.com wrote:
>>> Hi Alexandre,
>>>
>>> On 06.11.2018 23:09, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
Hi Claudiu,
Hi Sebastian,
On 06.12.2018 00:40, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 06:23:40PM +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>> On 07/11/2018 14:54:17+, claudiu.bez...@microchip.com wrote:
>>> Hi Alexandre,
>>>
>>> On 06.11.2018 23:09, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
Hi Claudiu,
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 06:23:40PM +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 07/11/2018 14:54:17+, claudiu.bez...@microchip.com wrote:
> > Hi Alexandre,
> >
> > On 06.11.2018 23:09, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > > Hi Claudiu,
> > >
> > > On 05/11/2018 11:14:26+,
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 06:23:40PM +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 07/11/2018 14:54:17+, claudiu.bez...@microchip.com wrote:
> > Hi Alexandre,
> >
> > On 06.11.2018 23:09, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > > Hi Claudiu,
> > >
> > > On 05/11/2018 11:14:26+,
On 07/11/2018 14:54:17+, claudiu.bez...@microchip.com wrote:
> Hi Alexandre,
>
> On 06.11.2018 23:09, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > Hi Claudiu,
> >
> > On 05/11/2018 11:14:26+, claudiu.bez...@microchip.com wrote:
> >> static int __init at91_poweroff_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
On 07/11/2018 14:54:17+, claudiu.bez...@microchip.com wrote:
> Hi Alexandre,
>
> On 06.11.2018 23:09, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > Hi Claudiu,
> >
> > On 05/11/2018 11:14:26+, claudiu.bez...@microchip.com wrote:
> >> static int __init at91_poweroff_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
Hi Alexandre,
On 06.11.2018 23:09, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Hi Claudiu,
>
> On 05/11/2018 11:14:26+, claudiu.bez...@microchip.com wrote:
>> static int __init at91_poweroff_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> @@ -154,16 +160,22 @@ static int __init at91_poweroff_probe(struct
>>
Hi Alexandre,
On 06.11.2018 23:09, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Hi Claudiu,
>
> On 05/11/2018 11:14:26+, claudiu.bez...@microchip.com wrote:
>> static int __init at91_poweroff_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> @@ -154,16 +160,22 @@ static int __init at91_poweroff_probe(struct
>>
Hi Claudiu,
On 05/11/2018 11:14:26+, claudiu.bez...@microchip.com wrote:
> static int __init at91_poweroff_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> @@ -154,16 +160,22 @@ static int __init at91_poweroff_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
> u32 ddr_type;
> int ret;
>
> +
Hi Claudiu,
On 05/11/2018 11:14:26+, claudiu.bez...@microchip.com wrote:
> static int __init at91_poweroff_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> @@ -154,16 +160,22 @@ static int __init at91_poweroff_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
> u32 ddr_type;
> int ret;
>
> +
Move SHDWC realted data to only one structure to have them grouped.
Inspired from commit 9be74f0d39c1 ("power: reset: at91-poweroff: make
mpddrc_base part of struct shdwc").
Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea
---
drivers/power/reset/at91-poweroff.c | 60 +++--
1 file
Move SHDWC realted data to only one structure to have them grouped.
Inspired from commit 9be74f0d39c1 ("power: reset: at91-poweroff: make
mpddrc_base part of struct shdwc").
Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea
---
drivers/power/reset/at91-poweroff.c | 60 +++--
1 file
12 matches
Mail list logo