Re: [PATCH net] bonding: fix accounting of active ports in 3ad

2017-05-19 Thread David Miller
From: Jarod Wilson Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 18:15:57 -0400 > On 2017-05-19 5:14 PM, David Miller wrote: >> From: Jarod Wilson >> Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 11:11:44 -0400 >> >>> As of 7bb11dc9f59d and 0622cab0341c, bond slaves in a 3ad bond are not >>> removed

Re: [PATCH net] bonding: fix accounting of active ports in 3ad

2017-05-19 Thread David Miller
From: Jarod Wilson Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 18:15:57 -0400 > On 2017-05-19 5:14 PM, David Miller wrote: >> From: Jarod Wilson >> Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 11:11:44 -0400 >> >>> As of 7bb11dc9f59d and 0622cab0341c, bond slaves in a 3ad bond are not >>> removed from the aggregator when they are down,

Re: [PATCH net] bonding: fix accounting of active ports in 3ad

2017-05-19 Thread Jarod Wilson
On 2017-05-19 5:14 PM, David Miller wrote: From: Jarod Wilson Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 11:11:44 -0400 As of 7bb11dc9f59d and 0622cab0341c, bond slaves in a 3ad bond are not removed from the aggregator when they are down, and the active slave count is NOT equal to number of

Re: [PATCH net] bonding: fix accounting of active ports in 3ad

2017-05-19 Thread Jarod Wilson
On 2017-05-19 5:14 PM, David Miller wrote: From: Jarod Wilson Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 11:11:44 -0400 As of 7bb11dc9f59d and 0622cab0341c, bond slaves in a 3ad bond are not removed from the aggregator when they are down, and the active slave count is NOT equal to number of ports in the

Re: [PATCH net] bonding: fix accounting of active ports in 3ad

2017-05-19 Thread David Miller
From: Jarod Wilson Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 11:11:44 -0400 > As of 7bb11dc9f59d and 0622cab0341c, bond slaves in a 3ad bond are not > removed from the aggregator when they are down, and the active slave count > is NOT equal to number of ports in the aggregator, but rather the

Re: [PATCH net] bonding: fix accounting of active ports in 3ad

2017-05-19 Thread David Miller
From: Jarod Wilson Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 11:11:44 -0400 > As of 7bb11dc9f59d and 0622cab0341c, bond slaves in a 3ad bond are not > removed from the aggregator when they are down, and the active slave count > is NOT equal to number of ports in the aggregator, but rather the number > of ports in

[PATCH net] bonding: fix accounting of active ports in 3ad

2017-05-17 Thread Jarod Wilson
As of 7bb11dc9f59d and 0622cab0341c, bond slaves in a 3ad bond are not removed from the aggregator when they are down, and the active slave count is NOT equal to number of ports in the aggregator, but rather the number of ports in the aggregator that are still enabled. The sysfs spew for

[PATCH net] bonding: fix accounting of active ports in 3ad

2017-05-17 Thread Jarod Wilson
As of 7bb11dc9f59d and 0622cab0341c, bond slaves in a 3ad bond are not removed from the aggregator when they are down, and the active slave count is NOT equal to number of ports in the aggregator, but rather the number of ports in the aggregator that are still enabled. The sysfs spew for