On Wed, 28 Mar 2018, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2018, Kees Cook wrote:
>
> > > I guess if we put this storage into the rs_control (rather than on the
> > > stack) then we'd have to worry about concurrent uses of it. It looks
> > > like all the other fields are immutable once it's set
On Tue, 27 Mar 2018, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 4:45 PM, Andrew Morton
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Mar 2018 16:17:57 -0700 Kees Cook wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 11:25 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 3:59 PM, Andrew Morton
> >> > wrote:
> >> >> On Thu,
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 4:45 PM, Andrew Morton
wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2018 16:17:57 -0700 Kees Cook wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 11:25 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>> > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 3:59 PM, Andrew Morton
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 15:59:19 -0700 Kees Cook
>> >> wrote:
>
On Mon, 26 Mar 2018 16:17:57 -0700 Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 11:25 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 3:59 PM, Andrew Morton
> > wrote:
> >> On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 15:59:19 -0700 Kees Cook wrote:
> >>
> >>> Avoid stack VLAs[1] by always allocating the upper bound of
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 11:25 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 3:59 PM, Andrew Morton
> wrote:
>> On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 15:59:19 -0700 Kees Cook wrote:
>>
>>> Avoid stack VLAs[1] by always allocating the upper bound of stack space
>>> needed. The existing users of rslib appear to max
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 3:59 PM, Andrew Morton
wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 15:59:19 -0700 Kees Cook wrote:
>
>> Avoid stack VLAs[1] by always allocating the upper bound of stack space
>> needed. The existing users of rslib appear to max out at 24 roots[2],
>> so use that as the upper bound until
On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 15:59:19 -0700 Kees Cook wrote:
> Avoid stack VLAs[1] by always allocating the upper bound of stack space
> needed. The existing users of rslib appear to max out at 24 roots[2],
> so use that as the upper bound until we have a reason to change it.
>
> Alternative considered:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 15:59:19 -0700 Kees Cook wrote:
> Avoid stack VLAs[1] by always allocating the upper bound of stack space
> needed. The existing users of rslib appear to max out at 24 roots[2],
> so use that as the upper bound until we have a reason to change it.
>
> Alternative considered:
Avoid stack VLAs[1] by always allocating the upper bound of stack space
needed. The existing users of rslib appear to max out at 24 roots[2],
so use that as the upper bound until we have a reason to change it.
Alternative considered: make init_rs() a true caller-instance and
pre-allocate the works
9 matches
Mail list logo