On 05/03/2018 15:39, William Cohen wrote:
On 03/05/2018 06:24 AM, John Garry wrote:
I am seeing issue(log below) with this patchset on our platfrom.
i have tried using your v2 branch [1]
root@borg-1>perf_acme>> ./perf --version
perf version 4.16.rc1.g087f7ca
root@borg-1>perf_acme>> ./perf stat
On 05/03/2018 15:39, William Cohen wrote:
On 03/05/2018 06:24 AM, John Garry wrote:
I am seeing issue(log below) with this patchset on our platfrom.
i have tried using your v2 branch [1]
root@borg-1>perf_acme>> ./perf --version
perf version 4.16.rc1.g087f7ca
root@borg-1>perf_acme>> ./perf stat
On 03/05/2018 06:24 AM, John Garry wrote:
>>> I am seeing issue(log below) with this patchset on our platfrom.
>>> i have tried using your v2 branch [1]
>>>
>>> root@borg-1>perf_acme>> ./perf --version
>>> perf version 4.16.rc1.g087f7ca
>>> root@borg-1>perf_acme>> ./perf stat -e bus_access_rd
On 03/05/2018 06:24 AM, John Garry wrote:
>>> I am seeing issue(log below) with this patchset on our platfrom.
>>> i have tried using your v2 branch [1]
>>>
>>> root@borg-1>perf_acme>> ./perf --version
>>> perf version 4.16.rc1.g087f7ca
>>> root@borg-1>perf_acme>> ./perf stat -e bus_access_rd
I am seeing issue(log below) with this patchset on our platfrom.
i have tried using your v2 branch [1]
root@borg-1>perf_acme>> ./perf --version
perf version 4.16.rc1.g087f7ca
root@borg-1>perf_acme>> ./perf stat -e bus_access_rd sleep 1
Performance counter stats for 'sleep 1':
I am seeing issue(log below) with this patchset on our platfrom.
i have tried using your v2 branch [1]
root@borg-1>perf_acme>> ./perf --version
perf version 4.16.rc1.g087f7ca
root@borg-1>perf_acme>> ./perf stat -e bus_access_rd sleep 1
Performance counter stats for 'sleep 1':
On 03/02/2018 11:35 AM, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 9:35 PM, William Cohen wrote:
>> On 03/02/2018 03:24 AM, John Garry wrote:
>>> On 27/02/2018 09:50, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 12:05:21AM +0800, John Garry wrote:
>
On 03/02/2018 11:35 AM, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 9:35 PM, William Cohen wrote:
>> On 03/02/2018 03:24 AM, John Garry wrote:
>>> On 27/02/2018 09:50, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 12:05:21AM +0800, John Garry wrote:
> This patchset adds
Can you check the modifications to the ARM64 JSONs you originally submitted in the
patchset please?>
If they are not checked, I'll have to see if the maintainers will accept
without your review. If not, I'll have to drop them.
I am seeing issue(log below) with this patchset on our platfrom.
i
Can you check the modifications to the ARM64 JSONs you originally submitted in the
patchset please?>
If they are not checked, I'll have to see if the maintainers will accept
without your review. If not, I'll have to drop them.
I am seeing issue(log below) with this patchset on our platfrom.
i
Hi John,
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 9:35 PM, William Cohen wrote:
> On 03/02/2018 03:24 AM, John Garry wrote:
>> On 27/02/2018 09:50, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>>> On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 12:05:21AM +0800, John Garry wrote:
This patchset adds support for some perf events features,
Hi John,
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 9:35 PM, William Cohen wrote:
> On 03/02/2018 03:24 AM, John Garry wrote:
>> On 27/02/2018 09:50, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>>> On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 12:05:21AM +0800, John Garry wrote:
This patchset adds support for some perf events features,
targeted at
On 03/02/2018 03:24 AM, John Garry wrote:
> On 27/02/2018 09:50, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 12:05:21AM +0800, John Garry wrote:
>>> This patchset adds support for some perf events features,
>>> targeted at ARM64, implemented in a generic fashion.
>>>
>>> The two main features are
On 03/02/2018 03:24 AM, John Garry wrote:
> On 27/02/2018 09:50, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 12:05:21AM +0800, John Garry wrote:
>>> This patchset adds support for some perf events features,
>>> targeted at ARM64, implemented in a generic fashion.
>>>
>>> The two main features are
Hi John,
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 1:54 PM, John Garry wrote:
> On 27/02/2018 09:50, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 12:05:21AM +0800, John Garry wrote:
>>>
>>> This patchset adds support for some perf events features,
>>> targeted at ARM64, implemented in a
Hi John,
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 1:54 PM, John Garry wrote:
> On 27/02/2018 09:50, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 12:05:21AM +0800, John Garry wrote:
>>>
>>> This patchset adds support for some perf events features,
>>> targeted at ARM64, implemented in a generic fashion.
>>>
>>>
On 27/02/2018 09:50, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 12:05:21AM +0800, John Garry wrote:
This patchset adds support for some perf events features,
targeted at ARM64, implemented in a generic fashion.
The two main features are as follows:
- support for arch/vendor/platform pmu events
On 27/02/2018 09:50, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 12:05:21AM +0800, John Garry wrote:
This patchset adds support for some perf events features,
targeted at ARM64, implemented in a generic fashion.
The two main features are as follows:
- support for arch/vendor/platform pmu events
On 27/02/2018 09:50, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 12:05:21AM +0800, John Garry wrote:
This patchset adds support for some perf events features,
targeted at ARM64, implemented in a generic fashion.
The two main features are as follows:
- support for arch/vendor/platform pmu events
On 27/02/2018 09:50, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 12:05:21AM +0800, John Garry wrote:
This patchset adds support for some perf events features,
targeted at ARM64, implemented in a generic fashion.
The two main features are as follows:
- support for arch/vendor/platform pmu events
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 12:05:21AM +0800, John Garry wrote:
> This patchset adds support for some perf events features,
> targeted at ARM64, implemented in a generic fashion.
>
> The two main features are as follows:
> - support for arch/vendor/platform pmu events directory structure
>- to
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 12:05:21AM +0800, John Garry wrote:
> This patchset adds support for some perf events features,
> targeted at ARM64, implemented in a generic fashion.
>
> The two main features are as follows:
> - support for arch/vendor/platform pmu events directory structure
>- to
This patchset adds support for some perf events features,
targeted at ARM64, implemented in a generic fashion.
The two main features are as follows:
- support for arch/vendor/platform pmu events directory structure
- to support this, topic subdirectory support needs to be dropped
- support for
This patchset adds support for some perf events features,
targeted at ARM64, implemented in a generic fashion.
The two main features are as follows:
- support for arch/vendor/platform pmu events directory structure
- to support this, topic subdirectory support needs to be dropped
- support for
24 matches
Mail list logo