Bowler
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] zynq: use GIC device tree bindings
>
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 01:05:57PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
> > 2012/11/5 Josh Cartwright :
> [..]
> > > Our usecase may admittedly be a bit weird, because what logic is in the
> > >
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 01:05:57PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
> 2012/11/5 Josh Cartwright :
[..]
> > Our usecase may admittedly be a bit weird, because what logic is in the
> > PL is ultimately determined (and even implemented) by the end user and
> > is loaded at runtime. There is a lot of machin
2012/11/5 Josh Cartwright :
> On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 03:20:59PM +, Michal Simek wrote:
>> On Saturday, October 27, 2012 4:43 PM, Josh Cartwright wrote:
>> > On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 02:06:45PM +, Michal Simek wrote:
>> > [...]
>> > > I am not big fan to use dtsi solution because dts can be
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 03:20:59PM +, Michal Simek wrote:
> On Saturday, October 27, 2012 4:43 PM, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 02:06:45PM +, Michal Simek wrote:
> > [...]
> > > I am not big fan to use dtsi solution because dts can be simple
> > > generated directly Fr
> Subject: [PATCH v4 1/5] zynq: use GIC device tree bindings
>
> The Zynq uses the cortex-a9-gic. This eliminates the need to hardcode
> register
> addresses.
>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright
> Cc: John Linn
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/d
The Zynq uses the cortex-a9-gic. This eliminates the need to hardcode
register addresses.
Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright
Cc: John Linn
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-ep107.dts | 10 ++
arch/arm/mach-zynq/common.c| 7 ++-
arch/arm/mach
wler
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] zynq: use GIC device tree bindings
>
> On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 02:06:45PM +, Michal Simek wrote:
> [...]
> > I am not big fan to use dtsi solution because dts can be simple
> > generated directly From Xilinx design tool based on your
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 02:06:45PM +, Michal Simek wrote:
[...]
> I am not big fan to use dtsi solution because dts can be simple generated
> directly
> From Xilinx design tool based on your hw design. That's why I can't see any
> benefit
> To have dtsi file.
Can I ask you to reconsider? We
k Bowler
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] zynq: use GIC device tree bindings
>
> On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 01:39:00PM +, Michal Simek wrote:
> > Hi Josh,
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Josh Cartwright [mailto:josh.cartwri...@ni.com]
>
ux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; John
> > Linn; Nick Bowler; Michal Simek
> > Subject: [PATCH v4 1/5] zynq: use GIC device tree bindings
> >
> > The Zynq uses the cortex-a9-gic. This eliminates the need to hardcode
> > register
> &
wler; Michal Simek
> Subject: [PATCH v4 1/5] zynq: use GIC device tree bindings
>
> The Zynq uses the cortex-a9-gic. This eliminates the need to hardcode
> register
> addresses.
>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright
> Cc: John Linn
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann
> ---
&
The Zynq uses the cortex-a9-gic. This eliminates the need to hardcode
register addresses.
Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright
Cc: John Linn
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-ep107.dts | 8 +---
arch/arm/mach-zynq/common.c| 7 ++-
arch/arm/mach-zyn
12 matches
Mail list logo
