On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 19:30:07 +0530 Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
wrote,
> On 26 August 2013 18:42, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, August 26, 2013 09:11:14 AM Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> >> On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 12:36:47 +0530 Viresh Kumar
> >> viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote,
> >> > On
On 26 August 2013 18:42, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, August 26, 2013 09:11:14 AM Lukasz Majewski wrote:
>> On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 12:36:47 +0530 Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
>> wrote,
>> > On 26 August 2013 12:32, Lukasz Majewski
>> > wrote:
>> > > On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 10:58:53
On Monday, August 26, 2013 09:11:14 AM Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 12:36:47 +0530 Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
> wrote,
> > On 26 August 2013 12:32, Lukasz Majewski
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 10:58:53 +0530 Viresh Kumar
> > > viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote,
> >
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 12:36:47 +0530 Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
wrote,
> On 26 August 2013 12:32, Lukasz Majewski
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 10:58:53 +0530 Viresh Kumar
> > viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote,
> >> Some minor nitpicking, nothing much :)
> >
> > Is there any chance to pull
On 26 August 2013 12:32, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 10:58:53 +0530 Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
> wrote,
>> Some minor nitpicking, nothing much :)
>
> Is there any chance to pull those corrected patches to v3.12?
Only Rafael can decide :)
> After your comments I think,
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 10:58:53 +0530 Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
wrote,
> Some minor nitpicking, nothing much :)
Is there any chance to pull those corrected patches to v3.12?
>
> On 13 August 2013 15:38, Lukasz Majewski
> wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 10:58:53 +0530 Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
wrote,
Some minor nitpicking, nothing much :)
Is there any chance to pull those corrected patches to v3.12?
On 13 August 2013 15:38, Lukasz Majewski l.majew...@samsung.com
wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
On 26 August 2013 12:32, Lukasz Majewski l.majew...@samsung.com wrote:
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 10:58:53 +0530 Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
wrote,
Some minor nitpicking, nothing much :)
Is there any chance to pull those corrected patches to v3.12?
Only Rafael can decide :)
After your
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 12:36:47 +0530 Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
wrote,
On 26 August 2013 12:32, Lukasz Majewski l.majew...@samsung.com
wrote:
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 10:58:53 +0530 Viresh Kumar
viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote,
Some minor nitpicking, nothing much :)
Is there any
On Monday, August 26, 2013 09:11:14 AM Lukasz Majewski wrote:
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 12:36:47 +0530 Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
wrote,
On 26 August 2013 12:32, Lukasz Majewski l.majew...@samsung.com
wrote:
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 10:58:53 +0530 Viresh Kumar
viresh.ku...@linaro.org
On 26 August 2013 18:42, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Monday, August 26, 2013 09:11:14 AM Lukasz Majewski wrote:
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 12:36:47 +0530 Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
wrote,
On 26 August 2013 12:32, Lukasz Majewski l.majew...@samsung.com
wrote:
On Mon, 26
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 19:30:07 +0530 Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
wrote,
On 26 August 2013 18:42, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Monday, August 26, 2013 09:11:14 AM Lukasz Majewski wrote:
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 12:36:47 +0530 Viresh Kumar
viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote,
On 26
Some minor nitpicking, nothing much :)
On 13 August 2013 15:38, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +static int cpufreq_boost_set_sw(int state)
> +{
> + struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table;
> + struct cpufreq_policy
Some minor nitpicking, nothing much :)
On 13 August 2013 15:38, Lukasz Majewski l.majew...@samsung.com wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+static int cpufreq_boost_set_sw(int state)
+{
+ struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table;
+ struct
This commit adds boost frequency support in cpufreq core (Hardware &
Software). Some SoCs (like Exynos4 - e.g. 4x12) allow setting frequency
above its normal operation limits. Such mode shall be only used for a
short time.
Overclocking (boost) support is essentially provided by platform
dependent
This commit adds boost frequency support in cpufreq core (Hardware
Software). Some SoCs (like Exynos4 - e.g. 4x12) allow setting frequency
above its normal operation limits. Such mode shall be only used for a
short time.
Overclocking (boost) support is essentially provided by platform
dependent
16 matches
Mail list logo
