Re: [lkp-robot] [blk] 47e0fb461f: BUG:unable_to_handle_kernel

2017-10-21 Thread Tejun Heo
(cc'ing Greg and quoting whole body) Greg, didn't we fix this some months ago? It looks like the issue where the hot unplug test code triggers detach before async probe is flushed. Thanks. On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 08:51:13AM +0800, Ye Xiaolong wrote: > On 10/09, Tejun Heo wrote: > >Hello, > > >

Re: [lkp-robot] [blk] 47e0fb461f: BUG:unable_to_handle_kernel

2017-10-21 Thread Tejun Heo
(cc'ing Greg and quoting whole body) Greg, didn't we fix this some months ago? It looks like the issue where the hot unplug test code triggers detach before async probe is flushed. Thanks. On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 08:51:13AM +0800, Ye Xiaolong wrote: > On 10/09, Tejun Heo wrote: > >Hello, > > >

Re: [lkp-robot] [blk] 47e0fb461f: BUG:unable_to_handle_kernel

2017-10-12 Thread Ye Xiaolong
On 10/09, Tejun Heo wrote: >Hello, > >On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 01:21:13PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> Tejun, any ideas? The original report is at >> >>https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/9/20/939 >> >> in case you don't see it in your inbox from lkml. > >So, in the full log, there is an earlier

Re: [lkp-robot] [blk] 47e0fb461f: BUG:unable_to_handle_kernel

2017-10-12 Thread Ye Xiaolong
On 10/09, Tejun Heo wrote: >Hello, > >On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 01:21:13PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> Tejun, any ideas? The original report is at >> >>https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/9/20/939 >> >> in case you don't see it in your inbox from lkml. > >So, in the full log, there is an earlier

Re: [lkp-robot] [blk] 47e0fb461f: BUG:unable_to_handle_kernel

2017-10-09 Thread Tejun Heo
Hello, On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 01:21:13PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Tejun, any ideas? The original report is at > >https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/9/20/939 > > in case you don't see it in your inbox from lkml. So, in the full log, there is an earlier warning. [ 60.198729] [

Re: [lkp-robot] [blk] 47e0fb461f: BUG:unable_to_handle_kernel

2017-10-09 Thread Tejun Heo
Hello, On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 01:21:13PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Tejun, any ideas? The original report is at > >https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/9/20/939 > > in case you don't see it in your inbox from lkml. So, in the full log, there is an earlier warning. [ 60.198729] [

Re: [lkp-robot] [blk] 47e0fb461f: BUG:unable_to_handle_kernel

2017-10-09 Thread Ye Xiaolong
On 09/30, Linus Torvalds wrote: >On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 12:02 AM, NeilBrown wrote: >> >> I think it is crashing in >> static inline bool ata_is_host_link(const struct ata_link *link) >> { >> return link == >ap->link || link == link->ap->slave_link; >> } > >Yes. The code

Re: [lkp-robot] [blk] 47e0fb461f: BUG:unable_to_handle_kernel

2017-10-09 Thread Ye Xiaolong
On 09/30, Linus Torvalds wrote: >On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 12:02 AM, NeilBrown wrote: >> >> I think it is crashing in >> static inline bool ata_is_host_link(const struct ata_link *link) >> { >> return link == >ap->link || link == link->ap->slave_link; >> } > >Yes. The code is > > 1a: 8b 3a

Re: [lkp-robot] [blk] 47e0fb461f: BUG:unable_to_handle_kernel

2017-09-30 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 12:02 AM, NeilBrown wrote: > > I think it is crashing in > static inline bool ata_is_host_link(const struct ata_link *link) > { > return link == >ap->link || link == link->ap->slave_link; > } Yes. The code is 1a: 8b 3amov

Re: [lkp-robot] [blk] 47e0fb461f: BUG:unable_to_handle_kernel

2017-09-30 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 12:02 AM, NeilBrown wrote: > > I think it is crashing in > static inline bool ata_is_host_link(const struct ata_link *link) > { > return link == >ap->link || link == link->ap->slave_link; > } Yes. The code is 1a: 8b 3amov(%edx),%edi 1c: 8d

Re: [lkp-robot] [blk] 47e0fb461f: BUG:unable_to_handle_kernel

2017-09-30 Thread NeilBrown
On Thu, Sep 21 2017, kernel test robot wrote: > FYI, we noticed the following commit: > > commit: 47e0fb461fca1a68a566c82fcc006cc787312d8c ("blk: make the bioset > rescue_workqueue optional.") > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master > > in testcase: trinity >

Re: [lkp-robot] [blk] 47e0fb461f: BUG:unable_to_handle_kernel

2017-09-30 Thread NeilBrown
On Thu, Sep 21 2017, kernel test robot wrote: > FYI, we noticed the following commit: > > commit: 47e0fb461fca1a68a566c82fcc006cc787312d8c ("blk: make the bioset > rescue_workqueue optional.") > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master > > in testcase: trinity >

[lkp-robot] [blk] 47e0fb461f: BUG:unable_to_handle_kernel

2017-09-20 Thread kernel test robot
FYI, we noticed the following commit: commit: 47e0fb461fca1a68a566c82fcc006cc787312d8c ("blk: make the bioset rescue_workqueue optional.") https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master in testcase: trinity with following parameters: runtime: 300s

[lkp-robot] [blk] 47e0fb461f: BUG:unable_to_handle_kernel

2017-09-20 Thread kernel test robot
FYI, we noticed the following commit: commit: 47e0fb461fca1a68a566c82fcc006cc787312d8c ("blk: make the bioset rescue_workqueue optional.") https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master in testcase: trinity with following parameters: runtime: 300s