Re: [patch 3/5] futex: Split out the waiter check from lookup_pi_state()

On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 20:45 +, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > We want to be a bit more clever in futex_lock_pi_atomic() and separate > the possible states. Split out the waiter verification into a separate > function. No functional change. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Reviewed for

Re: [patch 3/5] futex: Split out the waiter check from lookup_pi_state()

On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 20:45 +, Thomas Gleixner wrote: We want to be a bit more clever in futex_lock_pi_atomic() and separate the possible states. Split out the waiter verification into a separate function. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de Reviewed

[patch 3/5] futex: Split out the waiter check from lookup_pi_state()

We want to be a bit more clever in futex_lock_pi_atomic() and separate the possible states. Split out the waiter verification into a separate function. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner --- kernel/futex.c | 138 + 1

[patch 3/5] futex: Split out the waiter check from lookup_pi_state()

We want to be a bit more clever in futex_lock_pi_atomic() and separate the possible states. Split out the waiter verification into a separate function. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de --- kernel/futex.c | 138