On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 06:28:50PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> But maybe it's not needed here. I am not making the decisions myself.
> Not too late: post to the TC list and let's see what the response is.
> Without a feature bit you are making a change affecting all future
>
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 06:28:50PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> But maybe it's not needed here. I am not making the decisions myself.
> Not too late: post to the TC list and let's see what the response is.
> Without a feature bit you are making a change affecting all future
>
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 09:08:51AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 8:28 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 07:56:14AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> >> > I think for virtio it should include the feature bit, yes.
> >> > Adding
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 09:08:51AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 8:28 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 07:56:14AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> >> > I think for virtio it should include the feature bit, yes.
> >> > Adding feature bit is very
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 8:28 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 07:56:14AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> > I think for virtio it should include the feature bit, yes.
>> > Adding feature bit is very easy - post a patch to the virtio TC mailing
>> > list,
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 8:28 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 07:56:14AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> > I think for virtio it should include the feature bit, yes.
>> > Adding feature bit is very easy - post a patch to the virtio TC mailing
>> > list, wait about a week
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 07:56:14AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> > I think for virtio it should include the feature bit, yes.
> > Adding feature bit is very easy - post a patch to the virtio TC mailing
> > list, wait about a week to give people time to respond (two weeks if it
> > is around
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 07:56:14AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> > I think for virtio it should include the feature bit, yes.
> > Adding feature bit is very easy - post a patch to the virtio TC mailing
> > list, wait about a week to give people time to respond (two weeks if it
> > is around
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 5:40 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 12:06:03PM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 11:27 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> > On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 10:32:00AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>>
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 5:40 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 12:06:03PM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 11:27 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> > On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 10:32:00AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 6:12 AM,
On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 12:06:03PM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 11:27 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 10:32:00AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 6:12 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>
On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 12:06:03PM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 11:27 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 10:32:00AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 6:12 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at
On Apr 3, 2018, at 11:27 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
I'm not sure why you would need a feature bit. The capability is
controlled via PCI configuration space. If it is present the device
has the capability. If it is not then it does not.
Basically if the PCI configuration
On Apr 3, 2018, at 11:27 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
I'm not sure why you would need a feature bit. The capability is
controlled via PCI configuration space. If it is present the device
has the capability. If it is not then it does not.
Basically if the PCI configuration space is not
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 11:27 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 10:32:00AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 6:12 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 09:40:34AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> >>
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 11:27 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 10:32:00AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 6:12 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 09:40:34AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 9:34 AM,
On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 10:32:00AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 6:12 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 09:40:34AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> >> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 9:34 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin
> >>
On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 10:32:00AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 6:12 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 09:40:34AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> >> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 9:34 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 6:12 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 09:40:34AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 9:34 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:42:41AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> >>
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 6:12 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 09:40:34AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 9:34 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:42:41AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> >> From: Alexander Duyck
>> >>
>>
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 09:40:34AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 9:34 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:42:41AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> >> From: Alexander Duyck
> >>
> >> Hardware-realized
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 09:40:34AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 9:34 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:42:41AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> >> From: Alexander Duyck
> >>
> >> Hardware-realized virtio_pci devices can implement SR-IOV, so
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:42:41AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> From: Alexander Duyck
>
> Hardware-realized virtio_pci devices can implement SR-IOV, so this
> patch enables its use. The device in question is an upcoming Intel
> NIC that implements both a
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:42:41AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> From: Alexander Duyck
>
> Hardware-realized virtio_pci devices can implement SR-IOV, so this
> patch enables its use. The device in question is an upcoming Intel
> NIC that implements both a virtio_net PF and virtio_net VFs.
On Mar 15, 2018, at 11:42 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> From: Alexander Duyck
>
> Hardware-realized virtio_pci devices can implement SR-IOV, so this
> patch enables its use. The device in question is an upcoming Intel
> NIC that implements
On Mar 15, 2018, at 11:42 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> From: Alexander Duyck
>
> Hardware-realized virtio_pci devices can implement SR-IOV, so this
> patch enables its use. The device in question is an upcoming Intel
> NIC that implements both a virtio_net PF and virtio_net VFs. These
> are
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 9:34 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:42:41AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> From: Alexander Duyck
>>
>> Hardware-realized virtio_pci devices can implement SR-IOV, so this
>> patch enables its use.
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 9:34 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:42:41AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> From: Alexander Duyck
>>
>> Hardware-realized virtio_pci devices can implement SR-IOV, so this
>> patch enables its use. The device in question is an upcoming Intel
>>
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:42:41AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> From: Alexander Duyck
>
> Hardware-realized virtio_pci devices can implement SR-IOV, so this
> patch enables its use. The device in question is an upcoming Intel
> NIC that implements both a
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:42:41AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> From: Alexander Duyck
>
> Hardware-realized virtio_pci devices can implement SR-IOV, so this
> patch enables its use. The device in question is an upcoming Intel
> NIC that implements both a virtio_net PF and virtio_net VFs.
From: Alexander Duyck
Hardware-realized virtio_pci devices can implement SR-IOV, so this
patch enables its use. The device in question is an upcoming Intel
NIC that implements both a virtio_net PF and virtio_net VFs. These
are hardware realizations of what has been
From: Alexander Duyck
Hardware-realized virtio_pci devices can implement SR-IOV, so this
patch enables its use. The device in question is an upcoming Intel
NIC that implements both a virtio_net PF and virtio_net VFs. These
are hardware realizations of what has been up to now been a software
32 matches
Mail list logo