> So it works, but you are complaining anyway?
How serious do you interpret such information in the SmPL manual?
>> https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/blob/bf1c6a5869dd324f5faeeaa3a12d57270e478b21/docs/manual/cocci_syntax.tex#L50
>>
>> “…
>> Furthermore, @ should not be used in this code.
> So it works, but you are complaining anyway?
How serious do you interpret such information in the SmPL manual?
>> https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/blob/bf1c6a5869dd324f5faeeaa3a12d57270e478b21/docs/manual/cocci_syntax.tex#L50
>>
>> “…
>> Furthermore, @ should not be used in this code.
> So it works, but you are complaining anyway?
I dare to point a contradiction out between two information sources
once more.
Is this SmPL script really working in intended way already?
> I guess the conclusion is that it woks in strings (which are pretty
> universal) and not in comments
> So it works, but you are complaining anyway?
I dare to point a contradiction out between two information sources
once more.
Is this SmPL script really working in intended way already?
> I guess the conclusion is that it woks in strings (which are pretty
> universal) and not in comments
On Fri, 19 Jan 2018, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > I removed the blank line at EOF,
> > then applied to linux-kbuild/misc.
>
> This script for the semantic patch language is using the at sign within string
> literals for Python code.
>
> It is nice when this character seems to work also with the
On Fri, 19 Jan 2018, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > I removed the blank line at EOF,
> > then applied to linux-kbuild/misc.
>
> This script for the semantic patch language is using the at sign within string
> literals for Python code.
>
> It is nice when this character seems to work also with the
> I removed the blank line at EOF,
> then applied to linux-kbuild/misc.
This script for the semantic patch language is using the at sign within string
literals for Python code.
It is nice when this character seems to work also with the current software.
How does its usage fit to the following
> I removed the blank line at EOF,
> then applied to linux-kbuild/misc.
This script for the semantic patch language is using the at sign within string
literals for Python code.
It is nice when this character seems to work also with the current software.
How does its usage fit to the following
8 matches
Mail list logo
