R: R: [Linux-ATM-General] [ATMSAR] Request for review - update #1

2005-09-04 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
> Giampaolo, > > Should read: ...even if the ATMSAR actually lacks of AAL1, AAL2 > and AAL3/4 [where AAL3/4 is obsolete] capabilities... > > Just wanted to make it more precise according to the ATM > standards, this was the only intention of my "patch". You're right. Sorry about that. Thanks,

R: R: R: [Linux-ATM-General] [ATMSAR] Request for review - update #1

2005-09-04 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
> -Messaggio originale- > Da: matthieu castet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Inviato: domenica 4 settembre 2005 21.11 > > ...omissis... > > The problem is that lot's of new devices implement part of their dsp > function in the kernel space instead of in the device. > And as company don't wan

R: R: R: [Linux-ATM-General] [ATMSAR] Request for review - update #1

2005-09-04 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
> -Messaggio originale- > Da: matthieu castet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Inviato: domenica 4 settembre 2005 21.11 > > ...omissis... > > The problem is that lot's of new devices implement part of their dsp > function in the kernel space instead of in the device. > And as company don't wan

Re: R: R: [Linux-ATM-General] [ATMSAR] Request for review - update #1

2005-09-04 Thread matthieu castet
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: -Messaggio originale- Da: Francois Romieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Inviato: domenica 4 settembre 2005 17.33 A: Giampaolo Tomassoni Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oggetto: Re: R: [Linux-ATM-General] [ATMSAR] Request for review - update #1 .

R: R: [Linux-ATM-General] [ATMSAR] Request for review - update #1

2005-09-04 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
> -Messaggio originale- > Da: Francois Romieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Inviato: domenica 4 settembre 2005 17.33 > A: Giampaolo Tomassoni > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Oggetto: Re: R: [Linux-ATM-General] [ATMSAR] Request for review - update #1 > > ...omissis..