RE: [EXT] [PATCH v2 1/5] scsi: ufs: Allow UFS 3.0 as a valid version

2020-06-12 Thread Jose Abreu
From: Alim Akhtar Date: Jun/10/2020, 04:39:48 (UTC+00:00) > Are you still on this? Yes, apologies but I was caught on some other things. I'll try to re-submit once possible. --- Thanks, Jose Miguel Abreu

Re: [EXT] [PATCH v2 1/5] scsi: ufs: Allow UFS 3.0 as a valid version

2020-06-09 Thread Alim Akhtar
Hi Jose On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 1:44 PM Jose Abreu wrote: > > From: Bean Huo (beanhuo) > Date: Apr/29/2020, 13:59:08 (UTC+00:00) > > > Probably. I think we can leave them or change the dev_err to a dev_warn. > > > This way we have logs in case someone is using a non-supported version. > > > > >

RE: [EXT] [PATCH v2 1/5] scsi: ufs: Allow UFS 3.0 as a valid version

2020-04-30 Thread Jose Abreu
From: Bean Huo (beanhuo) Date: Apr/29/2020, 13:59:08 (UTC+00:00) > > > > @@ -8441,7 +8441,8 @@ int ufshcd_init(struct ufs_hba *hba, void > > > > __iomem *mmio_base, unsigned int irq) > > > > if ((hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_10) && > > > > (hba->ufs_version !=

RE: [EXT] [PATCH v2 1/5] scsi: ufs: Allow UFS 3.0 as a valid version

2020-04-29 Thread Bean Huo (beanhuo)
> > > @@ -8441,7 +8441,8 @@ int ufshcd_init(struct ufs_hba *hba, void > > > __iomem *mmio_base, unsigned int irq) > > > if ((hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_10) && > > > (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_11) && > > > (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_20) && > > > -

RE: [EXT] [PATCH v2 1/5] scsi: ufs: Allow UFS 3.0 as a valid version

2020-04-29 Thread Jose Abreu
From: Bean Huo (beanhuo) Date: Apr/24/2020, 16:57:07 (UTC+00:00) > Hi, Jose > > > @@ -8441,7 +8441,8 @@ int ufshcd_init(struct ufs_hba *hba, void __iomem > > *mmio_base, unsigned int irq) > > if ((hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_10) && > > (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_11)