Bowler
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] zynq: use GIC device tree bindings
>
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 01:05:57PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
> > 2012/11/5 Josh Cartwright :
> [..]
> > > Our usecase may admittedly be a bit weird, because what logic is in the
> &g
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 01:05:57PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
> 2012/11/5 Josh Cartwright :
[..]
> > Our usecase may admittedly be a bit weird, because what logic is in the
> > PL is ultimately determined (and even implemented) by the end user and
> > is loaded at runtime. There is a lot of
2012/11/5 Josh Cartwright :
> On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 03:20:59PM +, Michal Simek wrote:
>> On Saturday, October 27, 2012 4:43 PM, Josh Cartwright wrote:
>> > On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 02:06:45PM +, Michal Simek wrote:
>> > [...]
>> > > I am not big fan to use dtsi solution because dts can be
2012/11/5 Josh Cartwright josh.cartwri...@ni.com:
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 03:20:59PM +, Michal Simek wrote:
On Saturday, October 27, 2012 4:43 PM, Josh Cartwright wrote:
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 02:06:45PM +, Michal Simek wrote:
[...]
I am not big fan to use dtsi solution because
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 01:05:57PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
2012/11/5 Josh Cartwright josh.cartwri...@ni.com:
[..]
Our usecase may admittedly be a bit weird, because what logic is in the
PL is ultimately determined (and even implemented) by the end user and
is loaded at runtime. There is
v4 1/5] zynq: use GIC device tree bindings
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 01:05:57PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
2012/11/5 Josh Cartwright josh.cartwri...@ni.com:
[..]
Our usecase may admittedly be a bit weird, because what logic is in the
PL is ultimately determined (and even implemented
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 03:20:59PM +, Michal Simek wrote:
> On Saturday, October 27, 2012 4:43 PM, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 02:06:45PM +, Michal Simek wrote:
> > [...]
> > > I am not big fan to use dtsi solution because dts can be simple
> > > generated directly
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 03:20:59PM +, Michal Simek wrote:
On Saturday, October 27, 2012 4:43 PM, Josh Cartwright wrote:
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 02:06:45PM +, Michal Simek wrote:
[...]
I am not big fan to use dtsi solution because dts can be simple
generated directly From Xilinx
> -Original Message-
> From: Josh Cartwright [mailto:josh.cartwri...@ni.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 2:47 AM
> To: a...@kernel.org; Arnd Bergmann
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; John
> Linn; Nick Bowler; Michal Simek
> Subject: [PATCH
-Original Message-
From: Josh Cartwright [mailto:josh.cartwri...@ni.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 2:47 AM
To: a...@kernel.org; Arnd Bergmann
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; John
Linn; Nick Bowler; Michal Simek
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/5]
wler
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] zynq: use GIC device tree bindings
>
> On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 02:06:45PM +, Michal Simek wrote:
> [...]
> > I am not big fan to use dtsi solution because dts can be simple
> > generated directly From Xilinx design tool based on your
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 02:06:45PM +, Michal Simek wrote:
[...]
> I am not big fan to use dtsi solution because dts can be simple generated
> directly
> From Xilinx design tool based on your hw design. That's why I can't see any
> benefit
> To have dtsi file.
Can I ask you to reconsider?
k Bowler
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] zynq: use GIC device tree bindings
>
> On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 01:39:00PM +, Michal Simek wrote:
> > Hi Josh,
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Josh Cartwright [mailto:josh.cartwri...
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 01:39:00PM +, Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi Josh,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Josh Cartwright [mailto:josh.cartwri...@ni.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 10:03 PM
> > To: a...@kernel.org; Arnd Bergmann
> > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
Hi Josh,
> -Original Message-
> From: Josh Cartwright [mailto:josh.cartwri...@ni.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 10:03 PM
> To: a...@kernel.org; Arnd Bergmann
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; John
> Linn; Nick Bowler; Michal Simek
>
Hi Josh,
-Original Message-
From: Josh Cartwright [mailto:josh.cartwri...@ni.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 10:03 PM
To: a...@kernel.org; Arnd Bergmann
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; John
Linn; Nick Bowler; Michal Simek
Subject:
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 01:39:00PM +, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi Josh,
-Original Message-
From: Josh Cartwright [mailto:josh.cartwri...@ni.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 10:03 PM
To: a...@kernel.org; Arnd Bergmann
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
: [PATCH v4 1/5] zynq: use GIC device tree bindings
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 01:39:00PM +, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi Josh,
-Original Message-
From: Josh Cartwright [mailto:josh.cartwri...@ni.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 10:03 PM
To: a...@kernel.org; Arnd Bergmann
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 02:06:45PM +, Michal Simek wrote:
[...]
I am not big fan to use dtsi solution because dts can be simple generated
directly
From Xilinx design tool based on your hw design. That's why I can't see any
benefit
To have dtsi file.
Can I ask you to reconsider? We,
1/5] zynq: use GIC device tree bindings
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 02:06:45PM +, Michal Simek wrote:
[...]
I am not big fan to use dtsi solution because dts can be simple
generated directly From Xilinx design tool based on your hw design.
That's why I can't see any benefit To have dtsi
20 matches
Mail list logo
