Hi David,
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 08:25:27AM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> On 3/10/15 12:06 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> >Hi Arnaldo,
> >
> >On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 10:21:35AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >>For trace I need to take advantage of the fact that each mmap is ordered
>
On 3/10/15 12:06 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hi Arnaldo,
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 10:21:35AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
For trace I need to take advantage of the fact that each mmap is ordered
already and then just sort by the timestamp in the mmap head, etc.
In retrospect, the
Hi Arnaldo,
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 10:21:35AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> For trace I need to take advantage of the fact that each mmap is ordered
> already and then just sort by the timestamp in the mmap head, etc.
>
> In retrospect, the perf.data file should have kept that
Hi Arnaldo,
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 10:21:35AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
For trace I need to take advantage of the fact that each mmap is ordered
already and then just sort by the timestamp in the mmap head, etc.
In retrospect, the perf.data file should have kept that ordering,
On 3/10/15 12:06 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hi Arnaldo,
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 10:21:35AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
For trace I need to take advantage of the fact that each mmap is ordered
already and then just sort by the timestamp in the mmap head, etc.
In retrospect, the
Hi David,
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 08:25:27AM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
On 3/10/15 12:06 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hi Arnaldo,
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 10:21:35AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
For trace I need to take advantage of the fact that each mmap is ordered
already and then
Em Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 02:45:24PM +0200, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> On 4/03/2015 3:07 a.m., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >Em Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 10:01:23AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> >>On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 01:49:40PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >>> Just a preview, but
Em Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 02:45:24PM +0200, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
On 4/03/2015 3:07 a.m., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 10:01:23AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 01:49:40PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Just a preview, but this is
On 4/03/2015 3:07 a.m., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 10:01:23AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 01:49:40PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Hi,
Just a preview, but this is something David had mentioned at some
point, a major
On 4/03/2015 3:07 a.m., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 10:01:23AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 01:49:40PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Hi,
Just a preview, but this is something David had mentioned at some
point, a major
Em Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 10:01:23AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 01:49:40PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just a preview, but this is something David had mentioned at some
> > point, a major problem with 'perf trace' was that it wasn't using
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 01:49:40PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just a preview, but this is something David had mentioned at some
> point, a major problem with 'perf trace' was that it wasn't using
> 'perf_session' event reordering mechanism, so I've been working on
Hi,
Just a preview, but this is something David had mentioned at some
point, a major problem with 'perf trace' was that it wasn't using
'perf_session' event reordering mechanism, so I've been working on making it
use it, refactoring the ordered_events code so that it can be used by tools
Hi,
Just a preview, but this is something David had mentioned at some
point, a major problem with 'perf trace' was that it wasn't using
'perf_session' event reordering mechanism, so I've been working on making it
use it, refactoring the ordered_events code so that it can be used by tools
Em Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 10:01:23AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 01:49:40PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Hi,
Just a preview, but this is something David had mentioned at some
point, a major problem with 'perf trace' was that it wasn't using
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 01:49:40PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Hi,
Just a preview, but this is something David had mentioned at some
point, a major problem with 'perf trace' was that it wasn't using
'perf_session' event reordering mechanism, so I've been working on making it
16 matches
Mail list logo
