On Friday 03 July 2015 01:20 AM, Michal Marek wrote:
>>> >> Reported-by: Vineet Gupta
>>> >> Signed-off-by: Michal Marek
>> >
>> > Sweet, that works for me with the following patch below.
>> >
>> > Some logistics things:
>> > - It would be nice to keep both of these patches together - do u
Dne 2.7.2015 v 07:27 Vineet Gupta napsal(a):
> On Wednesday 01 July 2015 08:49 PM, Michal Marek wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 05:50:16PM +0530, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>>> On Thursday 18 June 2015 04:02 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
On Thursday 18 June 2015 03:44 PM, Michal Marek wrote:
> Uh,
On Friday 03 July 2015 01:20 AM, Michal Marek wrote:
Reported-by: Vineet Gupta vineet.gup...@synopsys.com
Signed-off-by: Michal Marek mma...@suse.com
Sweet, that works for me with the following patch below.
Some logistics things:
- It would be nice to keep both of these patches
Dne 2.7.2015 v 07:27 Vineet Gupta napsal(a):
On Wednesday 01 July 2015 08:49 PM, Michal Marek wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 05:50:16PM +0530, Vineet Gupta wrote:
On Thursday 18 June 2015 04:02 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
On Thursday 18 June 2015 03:44 PM, Michal Marek wrote:
Uh, this is not what
On Wednesday 01 July 2015 08:49 PM, Michal Marek wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 05:50:16PM +0530, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> On Thursday 18 June 2015 04:02 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>>> On Thursday 18 June 2015 03:44 PM, Michal Marek wrote:
Uh, this is not what I meant. KCFLAGS is a *user*
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 05:50:16PM +0530, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On Thursday 18 June 2015 04:02 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> > On Thursday 18 June 2015 03:44 PM, Michal Marek wrote:
> >> Uh, this is not what I meant. KCFLAGS is a *user* setting. It's meant to
> >> be set in the environment or command
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 05:50:16PM +0530, Vineet Gupta wrote:
On Thursday 18 June 2015 04:02 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
On Thursday 18 June 2015 03:44 PM, Michal Marek wrote:
Uh, this is not what I meant. KCFLAGS is a *user* setting. It's meant to
be set in the environment or command line.
On Wednesday 01 July 2015 08:49 PM, Michal Marek wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 05:50:16PM +0530, Vineet Gupta wrote:
On Thursday 18 June 2015 04:02 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
On Thursday 18 June 2015 03:44 PM, Michal Marek wrote:
Uh, this is not what I meant. KCFLAGS is a *user* setting. It's
Hi Michal,
On Thursday 18 June 2015 04:02 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On Thursday 18 June 2015 03:44 PM, Michal Marek wrote:
>> Dne 18.6.2015 v 10:45 Vineet Gupta napsal(a):
On Thursday 18 June 2015 01:43 PM, Michal Marek wrote:
>> Alternatively, as we already have
Hi Michal,
On Thursday 18 June 2015 04:02 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
On Thursday 18 June 2015 03:44 PM, Michal Marek wrote:
Dne 18.6.2015 v 10:45 Vineet Gupta napsal(a):
On Thursday 18 June 2015 01:43 PM, Michal Marek wrote:
Alternatively, as we already have CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE,
On Thursday 18 June 2015 03:44 PM, Michal Marek wrote:
> Dne 18.6.2015 v 10:45 Vineet Gupta napsal(a):
>> > On Thursday 18 June 2015 01:43 PM, Michal Marek wrote:
> Alternatively, as we already have CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE,
> a(nother) Kconfig option may make sense.
>>> >> We
Dne 18.6.2015 v 10:45 Vineet Gupta napsal(a):
> On Thursday 18 June 2015 01:43 PM, Michal Marek wrote:
Alternatively, as we already have CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE,
a(nother) Kconfig option may make sense.
>> We can also introduce some ARCH_CFLAGS that is appended near the end of
>> the
+CC Claudiu - ARC gcc guru
On Thursday 18 June 2015 02:25 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Vineet,
>
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Vineet Gupta
> wrote:
>> On Thursday 18 June 2015 01:43 PM, Michal Marek wrote:
> Alternatively, as we already have CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE,
>
Hi Vineet,
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Vineet Gupta
wrote:
> On Thursday 18 June 2015 01:43 PM, Michal Marek wrote:
>>> > Alternatively, as we already have CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE,
>>> > a(nother) Kconfig option may make sense.
>> We can also introduce some ARCH_CFLAGS that is appended
On Thursday 18 June 2015 01:43 PM, Michal Marek wrote:
>> > Alternatively, as we already have CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE,
>> > a(nother) Kconfig option may make sense.
> We can also introduce some ARCH_CFLAGS that is appended near the end of
> the list, and have arc/Makefile add its -O3 there.
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 09:10:30AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Vineet,
>
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Vineet Gupta
> wrote:
> > commit a1c48bb160f8368 "Makefile: Fix unrecognized cross-compiler command
> > line
> > options" moved ARCH specific cc option handling before common
On Thursday 18 June 2015 01:07 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> >> Can we include $(srctree)/arch/$(SRCARCH)/Makefile twice?
>> >
>> > Something like this would be ideal, but does that not bring back your
>> > warnings ?
> I don't think so. The warnings were caused by using the host compiler
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Vineet Gupta
wrote:
> On Thursday 18 June 2015 12:40 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Vineet Gupta
>> wrote:
>>> > commit a1c48bb160f8368 "Makefile: Fix unrecognized cross-compiler command
>>> > line
>>> > options" moved ARCH
On Thursday 18 June 2015 12:40 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Vineet Gupta
> wrote:
>> > commit a1c48bb160f8368 "Makefile: Fix unrecognized cross-compiler command
>> > line
>> > options" moved ARCH specific cc option handling before common -Os/O2 setup.
>> >
>>
Hi Vineet,
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Vineet Gupta
wrote:
> commit a1c48bb160f8368 "Makefile: Fix unrecognized cross-compiler command line
> options" moved ARCH specific cc option handling before common -Os/O2 setup.
>
> For ARC this had a subtle effect that we can no longer over-ride
Hi Geert,
commit a1c48bb160f8368 "Makefile: Fix unrecognized cross-compiler command line
options" moved ARCH specific cc option handling before common -Os/O2 setup.
For ARC this had a subtle effect that we can no longer over-ride generic -O2
with
-O3, hence a performance regression observed
Hi Geert,
commit a1c48bb160f8368 Makefile: Fix unrecognized cross-compiler command line
options moved ARCH specific cc option handling before common -Os/O2 setup.
For ARC this had a subtle effect that we can no longer over-ride generic -O2
with
-O3, hence a performance regression observed going
Hi Vineet,
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Vineet Gupta
vineet.gup...@synopsys.com wrote:
commit a1c48bb160f8368 Makefile: Fix unrecognized cross-compiler command line
options moved ARCH specific cc option handling before common -Os/O2 setup.
For ARC this had a subtle effect that we can no
Dne 18.6.2015 v 10:45 Vineet Gupta napsal(a):
On Thursday 18 June 2015 01:43 PM, Michal Marek wrote:
Alternatively, as we already have CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE,
a(nother) Kconfig option may make sense.
We can also introduce some ARCH_CFLAGS that is appended near the end of
the list, and
On Thursday 18 June 2015 12:40 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Vineet Gupta
vineet.gup...@synopsys.com wrote:
commit a1c48bb160f8368 Makefile: Fix unrecognized cross-compiler command
line
options moved ARCH specific cc option handling before common -Os/O2
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Vineet Gupta
vineet.gup...@synopsys.com wrote:
On Thursday 18 June 2015 12:40 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Vineet Gupta
vineet.gup...@synopsys.com wrote:
commit a1c48bb160f8368 Makefile: Fix unrecognized cross-compiler command
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 09:10:30AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Hi Vineet,
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Vineet Gupta
vineet.gup...@synopsys.com wrote:
commit a1c48bb160f8368 Makefile: Fix unrecognized cross-compiler command
line
options moved ARCH specific cc option handling
On Thursday 18 June 2015 01:07 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Can we include $(srctree)/arch/$(SRCARCH)/Makefile twice?
Something like this would be ideal, but does that not bring back your
warnings ?
I don't think so. The warnings were caused by using the host compiler instead
of the
On Thursday 18 June 2015 01:43 PM, Michal Marek wrote:
Alternatively, as we already have CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE,
a(nother) Kconfig option may make sense.
We can also introduce some ARCH_CFLAGS that is appended near the end of
the list, and have arc/Makefile add its -O3 there. But I'd
Hi Vineet,
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Vineet Gupta
vineet.gup...@synopsys.com wrote:
On Thursday 18 June 2015 01:43 PM, Michal Marek wrote:
Alternatively, as we already have CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE,
a(nother) Kconfig option may make sense.
We can also introduce some ARCH_CFLAGS
+CC Claudiu - ARC gcc guru
On Thursday 18 June 2015 02:25 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Hi Vineet,
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Vineet Gupta
vineet.gup...@synopsys.com wrote:
On Thursday 18 June 2015 01:43 PM, Michal Marek wrote:
Alternatively, as we already have
On Thursday 18 June 2015 03:44 PM, Michal Marek wrote:
Dne 18.6.2015 v 10:45 Vineet Gupta napsal(a):
On Thursday 18 June 2015 01:43 PM, Michal Marek wrote:
Alternatively, as we already have CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE,
a(nother) Kconfig option may make sense.
We can also introduce some
32 matches
Mail list logo
