On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Justin Guyett wrote:
the offending process is memeat (allocates 192*1024*1024 bytes, then
memsets it to 0, then sleeps forever, though apparently it never gets to
that part). It has to be in memset(ptr, 0, 192*1024*1024).
ksymoops from sysrq-m attached,
hmm, well
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
2 4 2 77084 1524 18396 66904 0 1876 108 2220 2464 66079 198 1
^
Ok, I suspect that GFP_BUFFER allocations are fucking up here (they can't
block on IO, so they
Hi,
I get the source code of aic7xxx untar it in my Linux Kernel directory
and go to the directory /usr/src/linux/drivers/scsi/aic7xxx to make
aic7xxx_mod.o.
But i cannot make the modules. The error is as follows:
My Linux is RedHat 6.2 and kernel version is 2.2.14-5.0 .
Please give
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
2 4 2 77084 1524 18396 66904 0 1876 108 2220 2464 66079 198 1
^
Ok, I suspect that GFP_BUFFER allocations are
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001 03:05:02, Jeff V. Merkey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ditto. I am also seeing this oops calling the sg driver for a
robotic tape library, and it also seems to happen on 2.4.4.
In my case it appears that it was the symptom of severe bus problems.
About 5 minutes after I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris Boot) wrote on 08.06.01 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Only the truly stupid would assume accuracy from decimal places.
Well then, tell all the teachers in this world that they're stupid, and tell
everyone who learnt from them as well.
*All*?
I'm in high school (gd. 11,
Hi everyone,
I am trying to implement T/TCP in linux 2.2.14. I am using a Linux box as a
client and a FreeBSD box as server. I have the following problem:
I send multiple data packets from the client, the sequence looks like this:
1. Client sends syn with data SYN, PSH
2. Client sends data
Rob Landley writes:
On Wednesday 20 June 2001 15:53, Martin Dalecki wrote:
Mike Harrold wrote:
super computing, hmm what about some PowerPC CPU variant - they very
compettetiv in terms of cost and FPU performance! Transmeta isn't the
adequate choice here.
You honestly think you can fit
I have a home network with two machines connected with
3c905B cards. The main machine also has a isdn dialup connection.
Networking works well except if I let the main machine masquerade
so the other can use the internet too. I use iptables for this.
It works for a day or so, then eth0 goes
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 05:53:44PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not I. The slides for my last meeting were done as TIFF files and I used xv to
display them. Plus, the most recent documentation I wrote for one of our
mainframe applications was done with vi and LaTeX. What, in addition to
I would like to automate generating the prototype list for smbfs. The list
in include/linux/smb_fs.h is probably mostly correct ... or not.
Does anyone use this type of tool anywhere else in the kernel sources?
Any input on how to set it up right is appreciated.
Here is what I have right now.
Hello,
At Thu, 21 Jun 2001 08:15:10,
Trevor Hemsley wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001 03:05:02, Jeff V. Merkey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ditto. I am also seeing this oops calling the sg driver for a
robotic tape library, and it also seems to happen on 2.4.4.
In my case it appears that
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
2 4 2 77084 1524 18396 66904 0 1876 108 2220 2464 66079 198 1
^
On Tue, 8 May 2001, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Lorenzo Marcantonio wrote:
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Rob Turk wrote:
Have you ruled out hardware failures? There's been a few isolated reports
That tape drive (Sony SDT-9000, less than 2 years of service) works
perfectly on
I have seen school projects with interfaces done in java (to be 'portable')
and you could go to have a coffee while a menu pulled down.
Yeah, but the slowness there comes from the phrase school project and not
the phrase done in java. I've seen menuing interfaces on a 1 mhz commodore
64
I managed to get my hands on a dual athlon box and get it working fairly
well. I have been unable to get agpgart working however because it is an
unrecognized chipset. It would be great to get this working and I would
be happy to supply any info or do some testing for the developers. On a
Alan Cox wrote:
http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,5092935,00.html
Of course the URL that goes with that is :
http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/interix/features.asp
Yes., Microsoft ship GNU C (quite legally) as part of their offerings...
Do they include the source?
Hi,
I'm trying to build a kernel for Cyrix MediaGX. Kernel version is 2.4.6-pre3
as it comes straight from the XFS devel tree.
Processor type is set to 586/K5/5x86/6x86/6x86MX. Everything compiles fine.
Here comes my problem : the darn thing won't boot. I've seen at least 3
different behaviours
I realize that the Linux kernel supports user
level drivers (via ioperm, etc). However interrupts
at user level are not supported, does anyone think
it would be a good idea to add user level interrupt
support ? I have a framework for it, but it still
needs
a lot of work.
Depending on the
Can anyone tell me how I can use kernel hooks in my program? I want to
raise an action when a network connection to my server is established?
Ufuk Yuzereroglu
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo
Thibaut LAURENT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any idea ?
Try without APIC support compiled into the kernel.
I've seen too many different setup's barf on that! ;-)
Danny
--
Holland Hosting
www.hoho.nl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 03:41:32AM -0700, Balbir Singh wrote:
I realize that the Linux kernel supports user level drivers (via
ioperm, etc). However interrupts at user level are not supported,
does anyone think it would be a good idea to add user level
interrupt support ? I have a framework
Only the truly stupid would assume accuracy from decimal places.
Well then, tell all the teachers in this world that they're stupid, and tell
everyone who learnt from them as well.
*All*?
I'm in high school (gd. 11, junior)
and my physics teacher is always screaming at us for
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Pete Toscano wrote:
I had a similar problem with this yesterday. Try moving your .config
file to a safe place, making mrproper, then moving your .config back and
rebuilding. I did this and all was well.
HTH,
pete
Thanks Pete. I will give that a try..
On Wed,
Hi,
There is a bug in the locking scheme for the encryption functions,
which can be hooked into the loop device. I have a patch
which resolves the problem. First what happens:
If you do (for example) a losetup -e twofish /dev/loop0 test.lop
the following happens:
The loop0 device gets opened
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Balbir Singh wrote:
I realize that the Linux kernel supports user
level drivers (via ioperm, etc). However interrupts
at user level are not supported, does anyone think
it would be a good idea to add user level interrupt
support ? I have a framework for it, but it still
Jonathan Morton wrote:
I should instead write 59 ±2°C, since that is the most precision
I can possibly know it to. With some advanced measuring techniques
it *may* be acceptable to write 59.43 ±2°C *at most*, and then only
if you really know why you need the extra information.
It's easy to
Hi,
[1.] One line summary of the problem:
I can not start 2.4.6-pre5 on my machine.
[2.] Full description of the problem/report:
I've tried to upgrade from 2.4.5-pre1 to 2.4.6-pre5 but it failed the new
kernel failed to boot. It OOPS-es while it's starting. I managed to write
down some of
sarcasm
I think your mail is offtopic for linux-kernel: it doesn't mention Microsoft or user
space
java programming or pointer to random unrelated web pages, but an actual kernel bug.
/sarcasm
Ingo Rohloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If lo_open doesn't call the cipher lock function and
---Reply to mail from Dionysius Wilson Almeida about eepro100: wait_for_cmd_done
timeout
No..that was pretty much what i saw in the logs.
I see wait_for_cmd_done timeout being the only one being repeated in the
logs
The same here with 2.4.1 and 2.4.3.
Rafael Martinez
-
To unsubscribe
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Randal, Phil wrote:
Jonathan Morton wrote:
I should instead write 59 ±2°C, since that is the most precision
I can possibly know it to. With some advanced measuring techniques
it *may* be acceptable to write 59.43 ±2°C *at most*, and then only
if you really know
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Paul Flinders wrote:
Alan Cox wrote:
http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,5092935,00.html
Of course the URL that goes with that is :
http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/interix/features.asp
Yes., Microsoft ship GNU C (quite legally) as part
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 11:09:10PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,5092935,00.html
Of course the URL that goes with that is :
http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/interix/features.asp
Yes., Microsoft ship GNU C (quite legally) as part
I have an Surecom EP-320X-S Ethernet adapter which apparently uses a
Myson MTD-8xx chip. It works well with the fealnx driver (labeled
Myson MTD-8xx PCI Ethernet support in kernel config) except for one thing:
After a while in use it stops working and prints
Jun 21 12:18:18 naut kernel: NETDEV
Larry McVoy wrote:
You can scream all you want that it isn't free software but the fact
of the matter is that you all scream that and then go do your slides for
your Linux talks in PowerPoint.
Never used powerpoint. If I need slides I use a (linux-based) word
processor and a bigger font
Hi all,
this small patch (2.4.5-ac16) adds Intel i815/i820/i840/i850/i860 chipsets support
into i810 TCO watchdog driver, also MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE added.
Should work but untested (can't stop server just to test it :)
Best regards.
--
Andrey Panin| Embedded systems software
On Thursday 21 June 2001 07:44, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
Ok, I suspect that GFP_BUFFER allocations are fucking up here (they
can't block on IO, so they loop insanely).
Why doesn't the VM hang the
Hello
I have got a error in my syslog about a Null pointer in the kernel:
Kernel 2.4.5
glibc 2.2.12
gcc version 2.96 2731 (Red Hat Linux 7.0)
Modell: ISP2150
Motherboard: L440GX+ DP
CPU: 2 x Intel Pentium III (Coppermine) 850 MHz L2 cache: 256K / Bus: 100 MHz
RAM: 256 MB
SCSI
59.42886726469 ±2°C is obviously ludicrous, even if that's
what my calculator gives me. I should instead write 59 ±2°C, since
So, if I follow you argument then shouldn't you be writing 58 ±2°C or
should it be 60 ±2°C ?
Richard Moore - RAS Project Lead - Linux Technology Centre (ATS-PIC).
Rafael Martinez wrote:
Hello
I have got a error in my syslog about a Null pointer in the kernel:
Kernel 2.4.5
glibc 2.2.12
gcc version 2.96 2731 (Red Hat Linux 7.0)
Modell: ISP2150
Motherboard: L440GX+ DP
CPU: 2 x Intel Pentium III (Coppermine) 850 MHz L2 cache: 256K / Bus:
still not in 2.4.6-pre4. Without this, you'll get a lot of undefined
symbols referencing do_softirq
Jeff
[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
--- include/asm-i386/softirq.h Thu Jun 14 17:10:34 2001
+++ include/asm-i386/softirq.h.new Thu Jun 14 17:17:15 2001
@@ -36,13 +36,13 @@
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 06:38:09PM +0700, Dmitry A. Fedorov wrote:
kernel module to delivery hardware interrupts to user space
programs. Hardware interrupts (IRQ) are accessible by
character devices /dev/irq[0-15]. Interrupts delivered by
signals and select(2)/poll(2)
i believe libgpio uses
On Thursday 21 June 2001 10:46, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:
My last LinuxExpo talk was also made with PP,
This makes about as much sense as going to a cocktail party with nose glasses
on.
--
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a
Hi Linus,
the appended patch fixes several tmpfs problems:
1) writing out of a mapping of a tmpfs file into the same file can
deadlock
2) shmem_remount_fs garbles parameters which are not supplied
3) shmem_file_setup should check the maximum size
Please apply
Christoph
diff
At 23:50 +1000 2001-06-21, john slee wrote:
i believe libgpio uses the existing usb/iee1394/serial/parallel
interfaces to provide a limited userspace driver capability.
That only means, however, that the specific kernel drivers explicitly
support mid-level usermode access.
They still handle
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 03:58:33PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
At 23:50 +1000 2001-06-21, john slee wrote:
i believe libgpio uses the existing usb/iee1394/serial/parallel
interfaces to provide a limited userspace driver capability.
That only means, however, that the specific kernel
Rob Landley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wednesday 20 June 2001 17:20, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
Rob Landley writes:
My only real gripe with Linux's threads right now [...] is
that ps and top and such aren't thread aware and don't group them
right.
I'm told they added some kind of
You can scream all you want that it isn't free software but the fact
of the matter is that you all scream that and then go do your slides for
your Linux talks in PowerPoint.
I think this is an unfair generalization.
Not really. In Linus's book he describes that his presentations used
Hi!
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001 16:31:34 -0700
Dionysius Wilson Almeida Dionysius Wilson Almeida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jun 20 16:14:07 debianlap kernel: eepro100: wait_for_cmd_done timeout!
Jun 20 16:14:38 debianlap last message repeated 5 times
I saw the same message.
The comment before
Hi,
I ran into some problems with buffer.c trying to unlock a page of async io
buffer heads more
than once.
IMHO end_buffer_io_async() shouldn't rely on the value of b_end_io to
decide if the whole
page can be unlocked. It would make it easier for other layers (well
remappers like md or
lvm)
Dionysius Wilson Almeida Dionysius Wilson Almeida [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Jun 20 16:14:07 debianlap kernel: eepro100: wait_for_cmd_done timeout!
Jun 20 16:14:38 debianlap last message repeated 5 times
I saw the same message.
The comment before wait_for_cmd_done() function in
Hi,
My collegue has a Lifetec 9888 laptop (PII) that suffers from IRQ
deadlocking :
His TI PCMCIA bridge locates itself on IRQ 12, and so does his mouse.
System boots fine, but as soon as he types anything or moves his mouse,
the keyboard locks.
2.2.x doesn't seem to allocate a IRQ to the
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Oliver Neukum wrote:
Lastly an IRQ kernel module can disable_irq() from interrupt handler
and enable it again only on explicit acknowledge from user.
Unless you need that interrupt to be enabled to deliver the signal or let
Need not. Signal and other event delivery
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 04:39:11PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I ran into some problems with buffer.c trying to unlock a page of
sorry for the huge delay in the answer, I was going to answer your
previous two emails very shortly (I didn't forgotten ;).
async io buffer heads
On Thursday, June 21, 2001 05:08:13 PM +0200 Andrea Arcangeli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems we can more simply drop the tmp-b_end_io == end_buffer_io_async
check enterely and safely. Possibly we could build a debugging logic to
make sure nobody ever lock down a buffer mapped on a
On Thursday, 21. June 2001 16:46, Dmitry A. Fedorov wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Oliver Neukum wrote:
Lastly an IRQ kernel module can disable_irq() from interrupt handler
and enable it again only on explicit acknowledge from user.
Unless you need that interrupt to be enabled to deliver
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 11:16:42AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
Think of a mixture of fsync_inode_buffers and async i/o on page. Since
fsync_inode_buffers uses ll_rw_block, if that end_io handler is the last to
run the page never gets unlocked.
correct
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
All,
Wouldn't microsoft be happy to see so many linux
developers and extraordinaries while away their
time on a trivial issue instead of coming up with
other befitting replies.
Not to mention, it reduces the SNR of kernel list
pretty much.
We all _love_ linux and let's focus on that.
best of
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 04:39:11PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
diff -ruN old/fs/buffer.c new/fs/buffer.c
--- old/fs/buffer.c Thu Jun 21 09:47:20 2001
+++ new/fs/buffer.c Thu Jun 21 10:44:01 2001
@@ -798,11 +798,12 @@
* that unlock the page..
*/
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 12:18:12PM +0100, Jonathan Morton wrote:
I've been taught by every Maths, Engineering and Physics
teacher/lecturer I've encountered to write down significant figures
consistent with the precision of the value. So blindly writing down
a value of 59.42886726469 ±2°C
simple source access. I don't know that anyone has ever asked for the source
code for Word. If they did, we would give it to them. But it's not a typical
request.
So who wants to go ask for the source code to word then? I mean we have
Bill's word that they will give it to us.
Brent Norris
Pavel Machek wrote:
Isn't this why noflushd exists or is this an evil thing that shouldn't
ever be used and will eventually eat my disks for breakfast?
It would eat your flash for breakfast. You know, flash memories have
no spinning parts, so there's nothing to spin down.
Btw Pavel, does
Hi, again!
I'ts me, Masaru Kawashima, from home.
I'm sorry I made a stupid mistake last time!
This time, I promise you that I attach the proper patch for
linux/drivers/net/eepro100.c. (running version)
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001 23:19:39 +0900
Masaru Kawashima Masaru Kawashima [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dmitry A. Fedorov wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Oliver Neukum wrote:
Lastly an IRQ kernel module can disable_irq() from interrupt handler
and enable it again only on explicit acknowledge from user.
Unless you need that interrupt to be enabled to deliver the signal or let
Need not.
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/
Intermediate diffs are available from
http://www.bzimage.org
2.4.5-ac17
o Sanity check the BIOS tables for bootflag (me)
o Update multicast support by devices doc
File backed loop device on 4k block size ext2 filesystem:
debian:/root # dd if=/dev/zero of=file1 bs=1024 count=10
10+0 records in
10+0 records out
debian:/root # losetup /dev/loop0 file1
debian:/root # dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/loop0 bs=1024 count=10 conv=notrunc
dd: /dev/loop0: No space left on
simple source access. I don't know that anyone has ever
asked for the source
code for Word. If they did, we would give it to them. But
it's not a typical
request.
So who wants to go ask for the source code to word then? I
mean we have
Bill's word that they will give it to us.
If
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
It seems we can more simply drop the tmp-b_end_io == end_buffer_io_async
check enterely and safely.
I doubt it.
Think about somebody who writes a partial page (but a full buffer).
Somebody _else_ then reads the rest of the page. You'll have one
Richard J Moore wrote:
59.42886726469 ±2°C is obviously ludicrous, even if that's
what my calculator gives me. I should instead write 59 ±2°C, since
So, if I follow you argument then shouldn't you be writing 58 ±2°C or
should it be 60 ±2°C ?
What it means is that whatever dingus
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
2.4.5-ac17
o Swapfile bugfix (Rik van Riel)
Written by Stephen Tweedie ...
regards,
Rik
--
Executive summary of a recent Microsoft press release:
we are concerned about the GNU General Public License (GPL)
== Blesson Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
hi all
I am in the way of building a new remote
file system.
Presently I decided to use sockets for remote
communication. Lately I understood that RPC is used in coda and
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 09:54:47AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
The above _will_ break. tmp may be locked due to the write - and the
indeed, I missed the pending writes sorry.
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
Jeff Chua wrote:
still not in 2.4.6-pre4. Without this, you'll get a lot of undefined
symbols referencing do_softirq
it's already in pre5...
--
Jeff Garzik | Andre the Giant has a posse.
Building 1024|
MandrakeSoft |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 09:56:04AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
What's the problem with the existing code, and why do people want to add a
(unnecessary) new bit?
there's no problem with the existing code, what I understood is that
they cannot overwrite the -b_end_io callback in the lowlevel
On 21 Jun 2001 15:48:11 +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
On Thursday 21 June 2001 10:46, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:
My last LinuxExpo talk was also made with PP,
This makes about as much sense as going to a cocktail party with nose glasses
on.
One of the mantras that get hammered into
An hour ago or so I put 07-2.4.6pre5-gendisk on ftp.kernel.org
(and rediffed the previous six patches against 2.4.6pre5).
It has add_gendisk, del_gendisk, get_gendisk, blk_gendisk[]
(a.k.a. register_gendisk, unregister_gendisk, find_gendisk),
so that one now can find the gendisk structure given
Hello,
After applying this patch, I suddenly got flooded by iptables with
tonnes of messages being flagged as TAINTED by my firewall. I previously
ran 2.4.6pre3 with no problems whatsoever, so I think the additional
network driver updates might have caused a problem? I'm using
a 3c905b if
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 05:38:56PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
[snip]
2.4.5-ac17
[snip]
Hi Alan
Sorry to bug you but could you tell us what's up with the synchronisation
between your tree and Linus' please? I haven't seen any ac stuff being
spooled into Linus' tree for a while and the trees seem
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 07:15:22PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 09:56:04AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
What's the problem with the existing code, and why do people want to add a
(unnecessary) new bit?
there's no problem with the existing code, what I understood
Rob Landley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However, the very concept of Java encourages not caring about
performance, system-design or any elegance whatsoever.
The same arguments were made 30 years ago about writing the OS in a high
level language like C rather than in raw assembly.
30 years
As you know, there's been another flap recently about the GPL status
of loadable kernel modules. You have a note that touches on this in
the kernel COPYING file, but it is not sufficient to resolve the
questions that keep coming up.
Earlier today I was contacted by a principal at a well-known
On Thursday, June 21, 2001 07:15:22 PM +0200 Andrea Arcangeli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 09:56:04AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
What's the problem with the existing code, and why do people want to add
a
(unnecessary) new bit?
there's no problem with the existing
Ingo Rohloff writes:
PS: Because I try to understand the inner workings of the loop
device better, I have a question:
In lo_send is a loop: while (len0). How can I configure
a loop device, so that this loop is executed more than once.
It seems this is only possible if
The attached patch-in-progress removes the per-cpu statistics from
struct kernel_stat and puts them in a cpu_stat structure, one per cpu,
cacheline padded. The data is still coolated and presented through
/proc/stat, but another file /proc/cpustat is also added. The locking
is as nonexistant as
Eric S. Raymond wrote:
The GPL license reproduced below is copyrighted by the Free Software
Foundation, but the Linux kernel is copyrighted by me and others who
actually wrote it.
The GPL license requires that
Diff between 2.4.6pre3aa2 and 2.4.6pre5aa1:
-
Moved on top of 2.4.6pre5.
Only in 2.4.6pre3aa2: 00_alpha-warnings-1
Only in 2.4.6pre3aa2: 00_backout-udelay-1
Only in 2.4.6pre3aa2: 00_locks-1
Only in 2.4.6pre3aa2:
** Reply to message from Eric S. Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 21
Jun 2001 14:14:42 -0400
To calm down the lawyers, I as the principal kernel maintainer and
anthology copyright holder on the code am therefore adding the
following interpretations to the kernel license:
1. Userland
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 09:56:04AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
What's the problem with the existing code, and why do people want to add a
(unnecessary) new bit?
there's no problem with the existing code, what I understood is that
they cannot
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 11:39:13AM -0700, Jeff Golds wrote:
Eric S. Raymond wrote:
The GPL license reproduced below is copyrighted by the Free Software
Foundation, but the Linux kernel is copyrighted by me and others
On 21 Jun 2001 13:46:48 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
** Reply to message from Eric S. Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 21
Jun 2001 14:14:42 -0400
To calm down the lawyers, I as the principal kernel maintainer and
anthology copyright holder on the code am therefore adding the
following
Hi,
I hope that I post this at the right place. There was
no answer at various other places. Please CC me for
any reply.
I would like to know if the problem I encounter can be
fixed:
I upgraded the system memory from 192 MB to 512 MB.
The system clearly detected the upgrade and linux booted.
On Wednesday 20 June 2001 23:13, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
Then again JavaOS was an abortion on top of Slowaris. [...]
This is a false statemenet, Rob. It was an abortion, all right,
but not related to Solaris in any way at all.
I worked on the sucker for six months at IBM in 1997. I don't know
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lauri Tischler) wrote on 21.06.01 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Richard J Moore wrote:
59.42886726469 ±2°C is obviously ludicrous, even if that's
what my calculator gives me. I should instead write 59 ±2°C, since
So, if I follow you argument then shouldn't you be
** Reply to message from Mike Harrold [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 21 Jun 2001
15:04:21 -0400 (EDT)
Not to mention utterly unenforceable. Consider:
1) Oracle Corp. builds their database for Linux on a Linux system.
2) Said system comes with standard header files, which happen in this case to
To be honest, I disagree that #include'ing a GPL header file should force your
app to be GPL as well. That may be how the license reads, but I think it's a
very bad idea. I could write 1 million lines of original code, but if someone
told me that but simply adding #include stdio.h my code
Hi,
I have been having problems using rename system call
on vfat file systems. I have looked at the kernel code
and tried everything I could do to figure out what
might be going wrong. As a last resort I thought you
might be able to help me.
The /etc/fstab entry for the drive that I mount looks
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, abc abc wrote:
If I reboot the machine just after the rename() call
is completed, when the machine comes up the file
/mnt/sns-c/segments/segfile has zero bytes and there
is no file in the tmp directory. Effectively the file
is lost some where. Running fsck recovers
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Timur Tabi wrote:
In my opinion, this whole thing would just go away (including some of
Microsoft's anti-GPL rants), if the FSF officially declared that under the GPL,
#including a GPL header file does NOT force your code to be also GPL.
The problem being, there is no
On Thursday 21 June 2001 10:02, Jesse Pollard wrote:
Rob Landley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wednesday 20 June 2001 17:20, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
Rob Landley writes:
My only real gripe with Linux's threads right now [...] is
that ps and top and such aren't thread aware and don't group
Jon Forsberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrit :
I have an Surecom EP-320X-S Ethernet adapter which apparently uses a
Myson MTD-8xx chip. It works well with the fealnx driver (labeled
Myson MTD-8xx PCI Ethernet support in kernel config) except for one thing:
After a while in use it stops working and
1 - 100 of 407 matches
Mail list logo
