On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 16:13:16 +0900 Kamezawa Hiroyuki
wrote:
> > What about futexes?
> >
>
> IIUC, futex's key is now a pair of (mm,address) or (inode, pgoff).
> Then, get_user_page() in futex.c will release the page by put_page().
> 'struct page' is just touched by get_futex_key() to obtain pag
Mark Zhang wrote @ Fri, 30 Nov 2012 05:59:32 +0100:
> On 11/28/2012 09:48 PM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> > Hiroshi Doyu wrote @ Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:50:14 +0300
> > (EEST):
> > ...
> > On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 12:04 +0300, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> >> diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/b
On 11/30/2012 06:05 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 04:46:09PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>> Old srcu implement requires sp->completed is loaded in
>> RCU-sched(preempt_disable()) section.
>>
>> The new srcu is now not RCU-sched based, it doesn't require the load of
>> sp->co
Some MSI laptop BIOSes are broken - INT 15h code uses port 92h to enable A20
line but resume code assumes that KBC was used.
The laptop will not resume from S3 otherwise but powers off after a while
and then powers on again stuck with a blank screen.
Fix it by enabling A20 using KBC. Affected lapt
Le 30/11/2012 02:37, Josh Cartwright a écrit :
> CC arch/arm/mach-sunxi/sunxi.o
> ./arch/arm/mach-sunxi/sunxi.c: In function 'sunxi_restart':
> ./arch/arm/mach-sunxi/sunxi.c:55:3: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'mdelay' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>
> Signed-off-by:
On Fri 30-11-12 13:12:29, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> (2012/11/27 3:47), Michal Hocko wrote:
> > Now that we have generic and well ordered cgroup tree walkers there is
> > no need to keep css_get_next in the place.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko
>
> Hm, then, the next think will be css_is_an
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >> > > +/* for automatic boot timing testcases */
> >> > > +#define ATAG_BOOTTIME 0x41000403
> >> > Where can I refer this ATAG usage? can you point out the reference URL
> >> > or patches?
> >
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 06:10:26PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 01:57:56PM +0900, YAMANE Toshiaki wrote:
> >
> > - ProcessLineStatus(qt_port, data[i + 3]);
> > -
> > i += 3;
> > + Process
On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 01:57 +, David Woodhouse wrote:
> I think it's actually fixed for pppoatm by the bh_lock_sock() and the
> sock_owned_by_user() check. As soon as vcc_release() calls lock_sock(),
> pppoatm stops accepting packets.
>
> It should be simple enough to do the same in br2684.
U
Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 02:26:27AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 14:55 -0200, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote:
>>> commit fe04ddf7c2910362f3817c8156e41cbd6c0ee35d upstream.
>>>
>>> There were reports of users destroying their Fedora installs by a
On Fri 30-11-12 12:21:32, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> (2012/11/29 6:34), Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Hello, guys.
> >
> > Depending on cgroup core locking - cgroup_mutex - is messy and makes
> > cgroup prone to locking dependency problems. The current code already
> > has lock dependency loop - memcg nes
On Thursday, November 29, 2012 5:41 PM Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH] fs/configfs: allow to create groups on demand
>
> This patch adds a function add a group to an existing one and its
> counterart. The newly created group behaves as it would be created via
> default_groups[]
On Thu, 2012-11-29 at 19:25 +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 03:40:05PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > 2012/11/29 Li Zhong :
> > > On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 13:55 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > >> > With rcu_user_exit() at the beginning, now rcu_irq_enter() only
> > >
Exynos5-bus device devfreq driver monitors PPMU counters and
adjusts operating frequencies and voltages with OPP. ASV should
be used to provide appropriate voltages as per the speed group
of the SoC rather than using a constant 1.025V.
Signed-off-by: Abhilash Kesavan
Cc: Jonghwan Choi
Cc: Kukjin
On 11/29/2012 09:45 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez"
>
> Turns out a few drivers have strayed away from using the
> spinlock_t typedef and decided to use struct spinlock
> directly. This series converts these drivers to use
> spinlock_t. Each change has been compile tested
Fix locating sibling memory controller PCI functions by using the
correct PCI domain and use Northbridge only if found. Tested on
multi-socket server and multi-server, multi-socket NumaConnect setup.
v7: Refactor patches grouping changes
v8: Restructure searching for PCI function for clarity; use
Use appropriate types for northbridge IDs and memory ranges. Mark immutable
data const and keep within compilation unit on related structures. Tested on
multi-socket server and multi-server, multi-socket NumaConnect setup.
v7: Refactor patches grouping changes
v8: Drop unneeded change; use const a
From: Fenghua Yu
Define interfaces microcode_sanity_check() and get_matching_microcode(). They
are called both in early boot time and in microcode Intel driver.
Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu
---
arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel_lib.c | 174 +
1 files changed, 174 in
From: Fenghua Yu
This updates ucode in 32-bit kernel. At this point, there is no paging and no
virtual address yet.
Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu
---
arch/x86/kernel/head_32.S |6 ++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/head_32.S b/arch/x86/kernel/
From: Fenghua Yu
Define interfaces load_ucode_bsp() and load_ucode_ap() to load ucode on BSP and
AP in early boot time. These are generic interfaces. Internally they call
vendor specific implementations.
Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu
---
arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 23 ++
ar
From: Fenghua Yu
Before initrd image is freed, copy valid ucode patches from initrd image
to kernel virtual memory. The saved ucode will be used to update AP in resume.
Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu
---
arch/x86/mm/init.c | 10 ++
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff -
From: Fenghua Yu
MICROCODE_INTEL_LIB, MICROCODE_INTEL_EARLY, and MICROCODE_EARLY are three new
configurations to enable or disable the feature.
Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu
---
arch/x86/Kconfig | 18 ++
1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kco
Am Donnerstag, den 29.11.2012, 11:38 -0700 schrieb Stephen Warren:
> On 11/29/2012 04:47 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > I agree. But I also fear that there will be changes eventually and
> > having both go in via different tree requires those trees to be
> > merged in a specific order to avoid brea
From: Fenghua Yu
The problem in current microcode loading method is that we load a microcode way,
way too late; ideally we should load it before turning paging on. This may only
be practical on 32 bits since we can't get to 64-bit mode without paging on,
but we should still do it as early as at
From: Fenghua Yu
This updates ucode on AP. At this point, BSP should store some valid ucode
patches in memory if it finds the ucode patches in initrd. AP searches the
stored ucode and uploads the ucode.
Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu
---
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c |7 +++
1 files changed, 7
From: Fenghua Yu
Implementation of early update ucode on Intel's CPU.
load_ucode_intel_bsp() scans ucode in initrd image file which is a cpio format
ucode followed by ordinary initrd image file. The binary ucode file is stored
in kernel/x86/microcode/GenuineIntel/microcode.hex in the cpio data.
From: Fenghua Yu
Define some functions and macros that will be used in early loading ucode. Some
of them are moved from microcode_intel.c driver in order to be called in early
boot phase before module can be called.
Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu
---
arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_intel.h | 106 ++
From: Fenghua Yu
Documenation for early loading microcode methodology.
Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu
---
Documentation/x86/early-microcode.txt | 43 +
1 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Documentation/x86/early-microcode.txt
diff
On 29.11.2012 13:47, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:21:04PM +0200, Terje Bergström wrote:
>> Tegra20 and Tegra30 are compatible, but future chips are not. I was
>> hoping we would be ready in upstream kernel for future chips.
>
> I think we should ignore that problem for now. G
If pdata->base_voltage_uV is missing or the settings of pdata->base_voltage_uV
and pdata->max_voltage_uV are out of range, TPS51632_VOLT_VSEL macro
returns wrong vsel.
Thus add checking [base|max]_voltage_uV pdata settings in probe.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin
---
drivers/regulator/tps51632-regulat
Hi,
On 2012-11-30 06:30, Axel Lin wrote:
> The i2c_device_id table is supposed to be zero-terminated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin
> ---
> drivers/video/omap2/displays/panel-picodlp.c |1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/displays/panel-picodlp.c
> b/d
On 11/30/2012 07:21 AM, Kamezawa Hiroyuki wrote:
> (2012/11/29 6:34), Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Hello, guys.
>>
>> Depending on cgroup core locking - cgroup_mutex - is messy and makes
>> cgroup prone to locking dependency problems. The current code already
>> has lock dependency loop - memcg nests get_o
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 01:20:32 +0100, Linus Walleij
wrote:
> From: Linus Walleij
>
> In the simple irqdomain: don't shout warnings to the user,
> there is no point. An informational print is sufficient.
>
> Cc: Rob Herring
> Cc: Grant Likely
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner
> Signed-off-by: Linus Wallei
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 07:35:00AM +0100, Francois Romieu wrote:
> Which kernel version is it ?
I have done the test and debug with mainline
e23739b4ade80a3a7f87198f008f6c44a7cbc9fd, v3.7-rc7-51-ge23739b
> I'd rather see the GigaMAC registers written through a call to
> rtl_rar_set when the mac
On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 15:51 -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
> index ce5224c..77ba946 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
> @@ -249,9 +249,9 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR(active_mode, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
>
On 11/26/2012 10:47 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> The code would be much more easier to follow if we move the iteration
> outside of the function (to __mem_cgrou_iter_next) so the distinction
> is more clear.
totally nit: Why is it call __mem_cgrou ?
What happened to your p ?
--
To unsubscribe from t
On 11/28/2012 12:08 PM, Jiang Liu wrote:
> On 2012-11-28 11:24, Bob Liu wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Tang Chen wrote:
>>> On 11/27/2012 08:09 PM, Bob Liu wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Tang Chen
wrote:
>
> Hi Liu,
>
>
> This feature is used
On Fri, 2012-11-16 at 19:56 +0800, NickCheng wrote:
> From: Nick Cheng
>
> Modify ARC-1214 IO behavior to make up for HW seldom malfunction.
> Signed-off-by: Nick Cheng
This still isn't right. I said you could ignore most of the warnings
(like lines over 80 characters), but you have a lot of t
This patch adds user eqs exception hooks for async page fault page not
present code path, to exit the user eqs and re-enter it as necessary.
Async page fault is different from other exceptions that it may be
triggered from idle process, so we still need rcu_irq_enter() and
rcu_irq_exit() to exit
On Wed, 28 Nov 2012, Frank Rowand wrote:
> 3.6.7-rt18: kernel BUG at .../kernel/sched/core.c:3817!
>
> Grant reported this same problem for 3.6.5-rt15.
>
> I am seeing it on a different arm board.
>
> Here is the BUG_ON():
>
>asmlinkage void __sched preempt_schedule_irq(void)
>{
>
On Fri 30-11-12 13:00:36, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On 11/30/2012 07:21 AM, Kamezawa Hiroyuki wrote:
> > (2012/11/29 6:34), Tejun Heo wrote:
> >> Hello, guys.
> >>
> >> Depending on cgroup core locking - cgroup_mutex - is messy and makes
> >> cgroup prone to locking dependency problems. The current c
> -Original Message-
> From: Kim, Milo [mailto:milo@ti.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 4:42 AM
> To: Venu Byravarasu
> Cc: Andrew Morton; Samuel Ortiz; a.zu...@towertech.it;
> swar...@wwwdotorg.org; Sivaram Nair; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] rtc-tps6591
On 11/30/2012 01:24 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 30-11-12 13:00:36, Glauber Costa wrote:
>> On 11/30/2012 07:21 AM, Kamezawa Hiroyuki wrote:
>>> (2012/11/29 6:34), Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello, guys.
Depending on cgroup core locking - cgroup_mutex - is messy and makes
cgroup prone
I get a board with 8168e-vl(10ec:8168 with RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_34),
everything looks well first, I can use ifconfig to set ip, netmask,
etc. And the rx/tx statistics show by ifconfig looks good when I
ping another host or ping it from another host. But it don't work,
I can't get ICMP REPLAY from both
On Wed, 07 Nov 2012 02:34:19 -0500 (EST), David Miller
wrote:
> From: Thierry Reding
> Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 07:52:58 +0100
>
> > It seems like OF_ADDRESS would be trickier. A comment around line 60 in
> > drivers/of/platform.c says that SPARC doesn't need functions defined in
> > the enclosing
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 09:35:20AM +, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Nov 2012 02:34:19 -0500 (EST), David Miller
> wrote:
> > From: Thierry Reding
> > Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 07:52:58 +0100
> >
> > > It seems like OF_ADDRESS would be trickier. A comment around line 60 in
> > > drivers/of/pl
On 11/30/2012 01:24 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 30-11-12 13:00:36, Glauber Costa wrote:
>> On 11/30/2012 07:21 AM, Kamezawa Hiroyuki wrote:
>>> (2012/11/29 6:34), Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello, guys.
Depending on cgroup core locking - cgroup_mutex - is messy and makes
cgroup prone
As most of the charger chips come with two kinds of safety features
related to timing.
1. Watchdog Timer (interms of seconds/mins)
2. Safety Timer (interms of hours)
This patch adds these to fault causes in POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_HEALTH_*
enums so that whenever there is either watchdog timeout or safet
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 19:51:01, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 02:18:05PM +0530, Philip, Avinash wrote:
> > In AM33xx PWM sub modules like ECAP, EHRPWM & EQEP are integrated to
> > PWM subsystem. All these submodules shares the resources (clock) & has
> > a clock gating register
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 04:12:00PM +0530, Prabhakar Lad wrote:
> From: Manjunath Hadli
>
> Mauro/Greg,
> The below series of patches have gone through good amount of reviews, and
> agreed by Laurent, Hans and Sakari to be part of the staging tree. I am
> combining
> the patchs with the pull req
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 12:38:29 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 04:26:48PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
>
> > Hmmm. okay that makes sense, but something still isn't quite right. So
> > of_translate_address should take care of drilling down through the bus
> > layers, and when
On 11/29/2012 12:14 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
Add a generic .dtsi device tree source file for the
common characteristics across IGEP Technology devices.
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas
---
Acked-by: Matthias Brugger
arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-igep.dtsi | 93 ++
On 11/29/2012 12:14 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
ISEE IGEPv2 is an TI OMAP3 SoC based embedded board.
This patch adds an initial device tree support to boot
an IGEPv2 from the MMC/SD.
Currently is working everything that is supported by DT
on OMAP3 SoCs (MMC/SD, GPIO LEDs, EEPROM, TWL403
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Morton [mailto:a...@linux-foundation.org]
> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 5:44 AM
> To: Kim, Milo
> Cc: Venu Byravarasu; Samuel Ortiz; a.zu...@towertech.it;
> swar...@wwwdotorg.org; Sivaram Nair; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] r
On Fri 30-11-12 13:42:28, Glauber Costa wrote:
[...]
> Speaking of it: Tejun's tree still lacks the kmem bits. How hard would
> it be for you to merge his branch into a temporary branch of your tree?
review-cpuset-locking is based on a post merge window merges so I cannot
merge it as is. I could c
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 08:25:22AM +, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 01:57 +, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > I think it's actually fixed for pppoatm by the bh_lock_sock() and the
> > sock_owned_by_user() check. As soon as vcc_release() calls lock_sock(),
> > pppoatm stops accept
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:43:08 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> From: Randy Dunlap
>
> Fix build when CONFIG_W1_MASTER_GPIO=m by exporting "allnodes".
>
> ERROR: "allnodes" [drivers/w1/masters/w1-gpio.ko] undefined!
>
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap
> Cc: Ville Syrjala
> ---
> drivers/of/base.c |
On Fri November 30 2012 10:47:39 Sakari Ailus wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 04:12:00PM +0530, Prabhakar Lad wrote:
> > From: Manjunath Hadli
> >
> > Mauro/Greg,
> > The below series of patches have gone through good amount of reviews, and
> > agreed by Laurent, Hans and Sakari to be part of t
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Thierry Reding
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 09:35:20AM +, Grant Likely wrote:
>> On Wed, 07 Nov 2012 02:34:19 -0500 (EST), David Miller
>> wrote:
>> > From: Thierry Reding
>> > Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 07:52:58 +0100
>> >
>> > > It seems like OF_ADDRESS wou
On 11/30/2012 01:49 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 30-11-12 13:42:28, Glauber Costa wrote:
> [...]
>> Speaking of it: Tejun's tree still lacks the kmem bits. How hard would
>> it be for you to merge his branch into a temporary branch of your tree?
>
> review-cpuset-locking is based on a post mer
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 05:04:29PM +0800, Wang YanQing wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 07:35:00AM +0100, Francois Romieu wrote:
> > Which kernel version is it ?
> I have done the test and debug with mainline
> e23739b4ade80a3a7f87198f008f6c44a7cbc9fd, v3.7-rc7-51-ge23739b
More exactly, I find th
From: Randy Dunlap
ERROR: "allnodes" [drivers/w1/masters/w1-gpio.ko] undefined!
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap
[grant.likely: allnodes is too generic; rename to of_allnodes]
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely
Cc: Ville Syrjala
---
arch/arm/mach-vexpress/v2m.c |2 +-
drivers/of/base.c|
ISEE IGEPv2 is an TI OMAP3 SoC based embedded board.
This patch adds an initial device tree support to boot
an IGEPv2 from the MMC/SD.
Currently is working everything that is supported by DT on OMAP3
SoCs (MMC/SD, GPIO LEDs, EEPROM, TWL4030 audio and pinctrl based mux).
Signed-off-by: Javier Mar
ISEE IGEP COM Module is an TI OMAP3 SoC computer on module.
This patch adds an initial device tree support to boot an
IGEP COM Module from the MMC/SD.
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas
Acked-by: Matthias Brugger
---
Changes since v1:
- Use default-state = "on" instead default-trigger
IGEP technology devices are TI OMAP3 SoC based industrial embedded
and computer-on-module boards. This patch-set adds initial device
tree support for these devices.
The device tree allows to boot from an MMC/SD and are working all
the components that already have device tree support on OMAP3 SoCs:
Add a generic .dtsi device tree source file for the
common characteristics across IGEP Technology devices.
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas
Acked-by: Matthias Brugger
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-igep.dtsi | 93 +
1 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 0
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 04:36:46PM +0800, Li Zhong wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-11-29 at 19:25 +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 03:40:05PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > 2012/11/29 Li Zhong :
> > > > On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 13:55 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > >> > Wi
Two of the bug traps here could really be warnings. The others are
converted from BUG() to GLOCK_BUG_ON() since we'll most likely
need to know the glock state in order to debug any issues which
arise. As a result of this, __dump_glock has to be renamed and
is no longer static.
Signed-off-by: Steve
From: Bob Peterson
[Editorial: This is a nit, but has been a minor irritation for a long time:]
This patch renames glops structure item for go_xmote_th to go_sync.
The functionality is unchanged; it's just for readability.
Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse
diff --g
From: David Teigland
Save the effort of allocating, reading and writing
the lvb for most glocks that do not use it.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/glock.c b/fs/gfs2/glock.c
index 9d29a51..2284de4 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/glock.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/g
From: Bob Peterson
This patch adds a return code check after attempting to allocate
a new inode during dinode creation.
Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/inode.c b/fs/gfs2/inode.c
index e321333..2405695 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/inode.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2
From: Bob Peterson
This patch changes the block allocation trace so that it references
the rgd's glock rather than the inode's glock. Now that the order
of inode creation is switched, this prevents a reference to the
glock which may not be set yet.
Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson
Signed-off-by: Ste
Hi Mark,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 03:23:30PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> As the wm8994 series of devices are now very mature make the current
> behaviour of the devices the default behaviour, any future revisions are
> likely to have only minor updates.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown
> ---
> drive
From: Bob Peterson
This patch fixes a cluster coherency problem that occurs when one
node creates a file, does several writes, then a different node
tries to write to the same file. When the inode's glock is demoted,
the inode wasn't synced to the media properly because the gl_object
wasn't set.
Hi Mark,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 05:37:13PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> Both WM5102 and WM5110 support haptics, register the device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown
> ---
> drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c |2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
I applied this one. Please let me know if you want to
On 11/30/2012 06:58 AM, Luck, Tony wrote:
>> If any significant percentage of memory is in ZONE_MOVABLE then the memory
>> hotplug people will have to deal with all the lowmem/highmem problems
>> that used to be faced by 32-bit x86 with PAE enabled.
>
> While these problems may still exist on lar
Hi Mark,
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 06:47:28PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown
> ---
> drivers/mfd/wm5102-tables.c |1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Applied, thanks.
Cheers,
Samuel.
--
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from
On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 07:47:52 +0100, Thierry Reding
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 04:10:24PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 09:54:57 +0100, Peter Ujfalusi
> > wrote:
> > > Hi Grant, Lars, Thierry,
> > >
> > > On 11/26/2012 04:46 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> > > > You're effe
From: David Teigland
When unmounting, gfs2 does a full dlm_unlock operation on every
cached lock. This can create a very large amount of work and can
take a long time to complete. However, the vast majority of these
dlm unlock operations are unnecessary because after all the unlocks
are done, g
Hi Mark,
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 07:04:16PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> We can cache some of them but this is simpler for now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown
> ---
> drivers/mfd/wm5102-tables.c |3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
Patch applied, thanks.
Cheers,
Samuel.
--
Intel Open S
From: David Teigland
The lksb struct already contains a pointer to the lvb,
so another directly from the glock struct is not needed.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/glock.c b/fs/gfs2/glock.c
index 2284de4..274b6be 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/glock.
Am 29.11.2012 23:53, schrieb Kay Sievers:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>
>> It's still a scheduling issue with Kay and Jan's patches.
>> Does anyone have any idea if/when those patches are going in?
>
> I was expecting that Jan rebases the patches incorporating
> the la
From: Bob Peterson
Since we now have a dirty_inode that takes care of manipulating the
inode buffer and writing from the inode to the buffer, we can
eliminate some unnecessary buffer manipulations in gfs2_unlink_inode
that are now redundant.
Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson
Signed-off-by: Steven Whi
Hi,
So yes, this is a bit early, but the tree seems to have settled down
now, and I'd like to hold off any further feature patches until the
subsequent merge window at this stage.
The main feature this time is the new Orlov allocator and the patches
leading up to it which allow us to allocate new
Rather than using the parent directory's allocation context, this
patch allocated the new inode earlier in the process and then uses
it to contain all the information required. As a result, we can now
use the new inode's own allocation context to allocate it rather
than having to use the parent dir
From: Bob Peterson
This patch changes the gfs2_dir_add function so that it uses
the dirty_inode function (via mark_inode_dirty) rather than manually
updating the dinode.
Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/dir.c b/fs/gfs2/dir.c
index 259b088..9a35
Hi Mark,
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 05:49:17PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> The expectation is that future revisions will behave as revision B.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown
> ---
> drivers/mfd/wm5102-tables.c |4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
This one does not apply. I'm
For filesystems with only a single resource group, we need to be careful
that the allocation loop will not land up with a NULL resource group. This
fixes a bug in a previous patch where the gfs2_rgrpd_get_next() function
was being used instead of gfs2_rgrpd_get_first()
Signed-off-by: Steven Whiteh
This patch fixes an issue relating to not having enough revokes
available when truncating journaled data files. In order to ensure
that we do no run out, the truncation is broken into separate pieces
if it is large enough.
Tested using fsx on a journaled data file.
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehous
On Fri 30-11-12 13:08:35, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On 11/26/2012 10:47 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > The code would be much more easier to follow if we move the iteration
> > outside of the function (to __mem_cgrou_iter_next) so the distinction
> > is more clear.
> totally nit: Why is it call __mem_cgr
Just like ext3, this works on the root directory and any directory
with the +T flag set. Also, just like ext3, any subdirectory created
in one of the just mentioned cases will be allocated to a random
resource group (GFS2 equivalent of a block group).
If you are creating a set of directories, each
This patch uses information gathered by the recent glock statistics
patch in order to derrive a boolean verdict on the congestion
status of a resource group. This is then used when making decisions
on which resource group to choose during block allocation.
The aim is to avoid resource groups which
From: Bob Peterson
This patch is a rewrite of function gfs2_rbm_from_block. Rather than
looping to find the right bitmap, the code now does a few simple
math calculations.
I compared the performance of both algorithms side by side and the new
algorithm is noticeably faster. Sample instrumentatio
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 05:18:41PM +0800, Li Zhong wrote:
> This patch adds user eqs exception hooks for async page fault page not
> present code path, to exit the user eqs and re-enter it as necessary.
>
> Async page fault is different from other exceptions that it may be
> triggered from idle p
On 11/30/2012 03:55 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 15:01:26 +0800 Lin Feng wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 11/30/2012 01:57 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 11:42:05 +0800 Lin Feng wrote:
>>>
hi Andrew,
On 11/30/2012 07:39 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Tric
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 10:56:39AM +0200, Terje Bergström wrote:
> On 29.11.2012 13:47, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:21:04PM +0200, Terje Bergström wrote:
> >> Tegra20 and Tegra30 are compatible, but future chips are not. I was
> >> hoping we would be ready in upstream kerne
Currently there is not limitation of number of requests in the loop bio
list. This can lead into some nasty situations when the caller spawns
tons of bio requests taking huge amount of memory. This is even more
obvious with discard where blkdev_issue_discard() will submit all bios
for the range and
New wait_event{_interruptible}_lock_irq{_cmd} macros added. This commit
moves the private wait_event_lock_irq() macro from MD to regular wait
includes, introduces new macro wait_event_lock_irq_cmd() instead of using
the old method with omitting cmd parameter which is ugly and makes a use
of new mac
On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 18:29:30 +0800 Lin Feng wrote:
> > add a new library function which callers can use before (or after?)
> > calling get_user_pages[_fast]().
> Sorry, I'm not quite understand what "library function" function means..
> Does it means a function aids get_user_pages() or totally wr
On 11/30/2012 11:20 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> Umm, I agree with you on duty cycle, but that's got nothing to do with
> period. 100% duty cycle looks exactly the same whether the period is
> 10ns or 100s.
Yes this is true. But some PWM hw can select it's clock based on the period_ns
provided.
In mo
1 - 100 of 671 matches
Mail list logo
