On 18/05/18 10:37, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
>> Marc Zyngier hat am 18. Mai 2018 um 10:07 geschrieben:
>>
>> I have a pretty simple series[1] which I used to profile 32bit guests on
>> an arm64 KVM host. Nobody really cared about it because running a 32bit
>> kernel
On 18/05/18 10:37, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
>> Marc Zyngier hat am 18. Mai 2018 um 10:07 geschrieben:
>>
>> I have a pretty simple series[1] which I used to profile 32bit guests on
>> an arm64 KVM host. Nobody really cared about it because running a 32bit
>> kernel on 64bit HW is a bit
Hi Marc,
> Marc Zyngier hat am 18. Mai 2018 um 10:07 geschrieben:
>
> I have a pretty simple series[1] which I used to profile 32bit guests on
> an arm64 KVM host. Nobody really cared about it because running a 32bit
> kernel on 64bit HW is a bit odd, to say the least, and
Hi Marc,
> Marc Zyngier hat am 18. Mai 2018 um 10:07 geschrieben:
>
> I have a pretty simple series[1] which I used to profile 32bit guests on
> an arm64 KVM host. Nobody really cared about it because running a 32bit
> kernel on 64bit HW is a bit odd, to say the least, and I'm probably the
>
On 17/05/18 20:59, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 05/17/2018 12:31 PM, Vince Weaver wrote:
>> On Thu, 17 May 2018, Vince Weaver wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 17 May 2018, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> with cortex-a7 now, would it be possible to later drop that if proper
>>> cortex-a53 support is added to the
On 17/05/18 20:59, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 05/17/2018 12:31 PM, Vince Weaver wrote:
>> On Thu, 17 May 2018, Vince Weaver wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 17 May 2018, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> with cortex-a7 now, would it be possible to later drop that if proper
>>> cortex-a53 support is added to the
On 05/17/2018 12:31 PM, Vince Weaver wrote:
> On Thu, 17 May 2018, Vince Weaver wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 17 May 2018, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> with cortex-a7 now, would it be possible to later drop that if proper
>> cortex-a53 support is added to the armv7 pmu driver? Or would that lead
>> to all
On 05/17/2018 12:31 PM, Vince Weaver wrote:
> On Thu, 17 May 2018, Vince Weaver wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 17 May 2018, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> with cortex-a7 now, would it be possible to later drop that if proper
>> cortex-a53 support is added to the armv7 pmu driver? Or would that lead
>> to all
On Thu, 17 May 2018, Vince Weaver wrote:
> On Thu, 17 May 2018, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> with cortex-a7 now, would it be possible to later drop that if proper
> cortex-a53 support is added to the armv7 pmu driver? Or would that lead
> to all kinds of back-compatability mess?
For what it's
On Thu, 17 May 2018, Vince Weaver wrote:
> On Thu, 17 May 2018, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> with cortex-a7 now, would it be possible to later drop that if proper
> cortex-a53 support is added to the armv7 pmu driver? Or would that lead
> to all kinds of back-compatability mess?
For what it's
On Thu, 17 May 2018, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 06:55:26PM +0200, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> > > Vince Weaver hat am 17. Mai 2018 um 18:34
> > > geschrieben:
> > > On Thu, 17 May 2018, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> > > > > Eric Anholt hat am
On Thu, 17 May 2018, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 06:55:26PM +0200, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> > > Vince Weaver hat am 17. Mai 2018 um 18:34
> > > geschrieben:
> > > On Thu, 17 May 2018, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> > > > > Eric Anholt hat am 17. Mai 2018 um 15:17
> > > > >
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 06:55:26PM +0200, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> > Vince Weaver hat am 17. Mai 2018 um 18:34
> > geschrieben:
> > On Thu, 17 May 2018, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> > > > Eric Anholt hat am 17. Mai 2018 um 15:17 geschrieben:
> > > > The a53
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 06:55:26PM +0200, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> > Vince Weaver hat am 17. Mai 2018 um 18:34
> > geschrieben:
> > On Thu, 17 May 2018, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> > > > Eric Anholt hat am 17. Mai 2018 um 15:17 geschrieben:
> > > > The a53 and a7 counters seem to match up, so we
Vince Weaver writes:
> On Thu, 17 May 2018, Stefan Wahren wrote:
>
>>
>> > Eric Anholt hat am 17. Mai 2018 um 15:17 geschrieben:
>> >
>> >
>> > The a53 and a7 counters seem to match up, so we advertise a7 so that
>> > arm32 can probe.
>
> so how
Vince Weaver writes:
> On Thu, 17 May 2018, Stefan Wahren wrote:
>
>>
>> > Eric Anholt hat am 17. Mai 2018 um 15:17 geschrieben:
>> >
>> >
>> > The a53 and a7 counters seem to match up, so we advertise a7 so that
>> > arm32 can probe.
>
> so how closely did you look at the a53/a7
Hi,
[added Peter, Ingo and Arnaldo]
> Vince Weaver hat am 17. Mai 2018 um 18:34
> geschrieben:
>
>
> On Thu, 17 May 2018, Stefan Wahren wrote:
>
> >
> > > Eric Anholt hat am 17. Mai 2018 um 15:17 geschrieben:
> > >
> > >
> > > The a53 and a7
Hi,
[added Peter, Ingo and Arnaldo]
> Vince Weaver hat am 17. Mai 2018 um 18:34
> geschrieben:
>
>
> On Thu, 17 May 2018, Stefan Wahren wrote:
>
> >
> > > Eric Anholt hat am 17. Mai 2018 um 15:17 geschrieben:
> > >
> > >
> > > The a53 and a7 counters seem to match up, so we advertise a7
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 2:17 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> The a53 and a7 counters seem to match up, so we advertise a7 so that
> arm32 can probe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt
Tested-by: Peter Robinson
We've carried the same/equiv patch in
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 2:17 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> The a53 and a7 counters seem to match up, so we advertise a7 so that
> arm32 can probe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt
Tested-by: Peter Robinson
We've carried the same/equiv patch in Fedora for a while with no issues.
Peter
> ---
>
On Thu, 17 May 2018, Stefan Wahren wrote:
>
> > Eric Anholt hat am 17. Mai 2018 um 15:17 geschrieben:
> >
> >
> > The a53 and a7 counters seem to match up, so we advertise a7 so that
> > arm32 can probe.
so how closely did you look at the a53/a7 differences? I see some
On Thu, 17 May 2018, Stefan Wahren wrote:
>
> > Eric Anholt hat am 17. Mai 2018 um 15:17 geschrieben:
> >
> >
> > The a53 and a7 counters seem to match up, so we advertise a7 so that
> > arm32 can probe.
so how closely did you look at the a53/a7 differences? I see some major
differences,
> Vince Weaver hat am 17. Mai 2018 um 16:11
> geschrieben:
>
>
> On Thu, 17 May 2018, Eric Anholt wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2837.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2837.dtsi
> > index 7704bb029605..1f5e5c782835 100644
> > ---
> Vince Weaver hat am 17. Mai 2018 um 16:11
> geschrieben:
>
>
> On Thu, 17 May 2018, Eric Anholt wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2837.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2837.dtsi
> > index 7704bb029605..1f5e5c782835 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2837.dtsi
> > +++
On Thu, 17 May 2018, Eric Anholt wrote:
>
> Is that better than a53? I'm happy to switch to that. The important
> part to me is the a7, since basically everyone with this hw is running
> arm32.
no, on further investigation it looks like a53 is more proper to use than
the generic armv8.
Is
On Thu, 17 May 2018, Eric Anholt wrote:
>
> Is that better than a53? I'm happy to switch to that. The important
> part to me is the a7, since basically everyone with this hw is running
> arm32.
no, on further investigation it looks like a53 is more proper to use than
the generic armv8.
Is
> Eric Anholt hat am 17. Mai 2018 um 15:17 geschrieben:
>
>
> The a53 and a7 counters seem to match up, so we advertise a7 so that
> arm32 can probe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt
Acked-by: Stefan Wahren
> Eric Anholt hat am 17. Mai 2018 um 15:17 geschrieben:
>
>
> The a53 and a7 counters seem to match up, so we advertise a7 so that
> arm32 can probe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt
Acked-by: Stefan Wahren
Vince Weaver writes:
> On Thu, 17 May 2018, Eric Anholt wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2837.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2837.dtsi
>> index 7704bb029605..1f5e5c782835 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2837.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2837.dtsi
>>
Vince Weaver writes:
> On Thu, 17 May 2018, Eric Anholt wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2837.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2837.dtsi
>> index 7704bb029605..1f5e5c782835 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2837.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2837.dtsi
>> @@ -17,6 +17,12 @@
>>
On Thu, 17 May 2018, Eric Anholt wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2837.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2837.dtsi
> index 7704bb029605..1f5e5c782835 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2837.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2837.dtsi
> @@ -17,6 +17,12 @@
> };
> };
>
> +
On Thu, 17 May 2018, Eric Anholt wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2837.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2837.dtsi
> index 7704bb029605..1f5e5c782835 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2837.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2837.dtsi
> @@ -17,6 +17,12 @@
> };
> };
>
> +
The a53 and a7 counters seem to match up, so we advertise a7 so that
arm32 can probe.
Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2837.dtsi | 6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2837.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2837.dtsi
index
The a53 and a7 counters seem to match up, so we advertise a7 so that
arm32 can probe.
Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2837.dtsi | 6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2837.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2837.dtsi
index
34 matches
Mail list logo