Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: Kill check with no effect
Le 17/09/2017 à 16:13, Richard Weinberger a écrit : > header.major is of type u8 and cannot be negative. > > Detected by CoverityScan CID#1417858 ("Integer handling issues") > > Fixes: f384b352cbf0 ("mtd: spi-nor: parse Serial Flash Discoverable > Parameters (SFDP) tables") > Signed-off-by: Richard WeinbergerApplied to the spi-nor/next branch of l2-mtd I've replaced header.major by header.minor in the commit message as reported by Boris. Thanks! > --- > Cyrille, > > I'm not sure what exactly you wanted to test. > Maybe it makes sense casting header.major to s8 before checking against < 0? > > Thanks, > //richard > --- > drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c > index d71765739a93..4b86decdf13e 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c > @@ -2252,8 +2252,7 @@ static int spi_nor_parse_sfdp(struct spi_nor *nor, > > /* Check the SFDP header version. */ > if (le32_to_cpu(header.signature) != SFDP_SIGNATURE || > - header.major != SFDP_JESD216_MAJOR || > - header.minor < SFDP_JESD216_MINOR) > + header.major != SFDP_JESD216_MAJOR) > return -EINVAL; > > /* >
Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: Kill check with no effect
Le 17/09/2017 à 16:13, Richard Weinberger a écrit : > header.major is of type u8 and cannot be negative. > > Detected by CoverityScan CID#1417858 ("Integer handling issues") > > Fixes: f384b352cbf0 ("mtd: spi-nor: parse Serial Flash Discoverable > Parameters (SFDP) tables") > Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger Applied to the spi-nor/next branch of l2-mtd I've replaced header.major by header.minor in the commit message as reported by Boris. Thanks! > --- > Cyrille, > > I'm not sure what exactly you wanted to test. > Maybe it makes sense casting header.major to s8 before checking against < 0? > > Thanks, > //richard > --- > drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c > index d71765739a93..4b86decdf13e 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c > @@ -2252,8 +2252,7 @@ static int spi_nor_parse_sfdp(struct spi_nor *nor, > > /* Check the SFDP header version. */ > if (le32_to_cpu(header.signature) != SFDP_SIGNATURE || > - header.major != SFDP_JESD216_MAJOR || > - header.minor < SFDP_JESD216_MINOR) > + header.major != SFDP_JESD216_MAJOR) > return -EINVAL; > > /* >
Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: Kill check with no effect
Hi Richard, Le 18/09/2017 à 11:44, Boris Brezillon a écrit : > On Sun, 17 Sep 2017 16:13:52 +0200 > Richard Weinbergerwrote: > >> header.major is of type u8 and cannot be negative. > > I guess you meant header.minor here. > >> >> Detected by CoverityScan CID#1417858 ("Integer handling issues") >> >> Fixes: f384b352cbf0 ("mtd: spi-nor: parse Serial Flash Discoverable >> Parameters (SFDP) tables") >> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger >> --- >> Cyrille, >> >> I'm not sure what exactly you wanted to test. >> Maybe it makes sense casting header.major to s8 before checking against < 0? >> Actually I hesitated between checking the exact match with one of the 3 major.minor pairs defined for each version of the JESD216 specification: JESD216: 1.0 JESD216 rev A: 1.5 JESD216 rev B (the latest one): 1.6 I was wondering whether I should accept 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 and 1.4 (unofficial) pairs too and also later versions, which should be backward compatible with JESD216 rev B, like rev B is backward compatible with rev A and so on... Finally I've chosen to accept everything after 1.0 to give a chance to next revisions to be supported as much as possible by the current code. The major number should not change but actually the test upon the minor value is useless as every unsigned number is greater than or equal to 0 ;) So once Boris comment taken into account: Acked-by: Cyrille Pitchen Best regards, Cyrille >> Thanks, >> //richard >> --- >> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c | 3 +-- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c >> index d71765739a93..4b86decdf13e 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c >> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c >> @@ -2252,8 +2252,7 @@ static int spi_nor_parse_sfdp(struct spi_nor *nor, >> >> /* Check the SFDP header version. */ >> if (le32_to_cpu(header.signature) != SFDP_SIGNATURE || >> -header.major != SFDP_JESD216_MAJOR || >> -header.minor < SFDP_JESD216_MINOR) >> +header.major != SFDP_JESD216_MAJOR) >> return -EINVAL; >> >> /* > >
Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: Kill check with no effect
Hi Richard, Le 18/09/2017 à 11:44, Boris Brezillon a écrit : > On Sun, 17 Sep 2017 16:13:52 +0200 > Richard Weinberger wrote: > >> header.major is of type u8 and cannot be negative. > > I guess you meant header.minor here. > >> >> Detected by CoverityScan CID#1417858 ("Integer handling issues") >> >> Fixes: f384b352cbf0 ("mtd: spi-nor: parse Serial Flash Discoverable >> Parameters (SFDP) tables") >> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger >> --- >> Cyrille, >> >> I'm not sure what exactly you wanted to test. >> Maybe it makes sense casting header.major to s8 before checking against < 0? >> Actually I hesitated between checking the exact match with one of the 3 major.minor pairs defined for each version of the JESD216 specification: JESD216: 1.0 JESD216 rev A: 1.5 JESD216 rev B (the latest one): 1.6 I was wondering whether I should accept 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 and 1.4 (unofficial) pairs too and also later versions, which should be backward compatible with JESD216 rev B, like rev B is backward compatible with rev A and so on... Finally I've chosen to accept everything after 1.0 to give a chance to next revisions to be supported as much as possible by the current code. The major number should not change but actually the test upon the minor value is useless as every unsigned number is greater than or equal to 0 ;) So once Boris comment taken into account: Acked-by: Cyrille Pitchen Best regards, Cyrille >> Thanks, >> //richard >> --- >> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c | 3 +-- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c >> index d71765739a93..4b86decdf13e 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c >> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c >> @@ -2252,8 +2252,7 @@ static int spi_nor_parse_sfdp(struct spi_nor *nor, >> >> /* Check the SFDP header version. */ >> if (le32_to_cpu(header.signature) != SFDP_SIGNATURE || >> -header.major != SFDP_JESD216_MAJOR || >> -header.minor < SFDP_JESD216_MINOR) >> +header.major != SFDP_JESD216_MAJOR) >> return -EINVAL; >> >> /* > >
Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: Kill check with no effect
Am Montag, 18. September 2017, 11:44:51 CEST schrieb Boris Brezillon: > On Sun, 17 Sep 2017 16:13:52 +0200 > > Richard Weinbergerwrote: > > header.major is of type u8 and cannot be negative. > > I guess you meant header.minor here. Correct. :) Thanks, //richard
Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: Kill check with no effect
Am Montag, 18. September 2017, 11:44:51 CEST schrieb Boris Brezillon: > On Sun, 17 Sep 2017 16:13:52 +0200 > > Richard Weinberger wrote: > > header.major is of type u8 and cannot be negative. > > I guess you meant header.minor here. Correct. :) Thanks, //richard
Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: Kill check with no effect
On Sun, 17 Sep 2017 16:13:52 +0200 Richard Weinbergerwrote: > header.major is of type u8 and cannot be negative. I guess you meant header.minor here. > > Detected by CoverityScan CID#1417858 ("Integer handling issues") > > Fixes: f384b352cbf0 ("mtd: spi-nor: parse Serial Flash Discoverable > Parameters (SFDP) tables") > Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger > --- > Cyrille, > > I'm not sure what exactly you wanted to test. > Maybe it makes sense casting header.major to s8 before checking against < 0? > > Thanks, > //richard > --- > drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c > index d71765739a93..4b86decdf13e 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c > @@ -2252,8 +2252,7 @@ static int spi_nor_parse_sfdp(struct spi_nor *nor, > > /* Check the SFDP header version. */ > if (le32_to_cpu(header.signature) != SFDP_SIGNATURE || > - header.major != SFDP_JESD216_MAJOR || > - header.minor < SFDP_JESD216_MINOR) > + header.major != SFDP_JESD216_MAJOR) > return -EINVAL; > > /*
Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: Kill check with no effect
On Sun, 17 Sep 2017 16:13:52 +0200 Richard Weinberger wrote: > header.major is of type u8 and cannot be negative. I guess you meant header.minor here. > > Detected by CoverityScan CID#1417858 ("Integer handling issues") > > Fixes: f384b352cbf0 ("mtd: spi-nor: parse Serial Flash Discoverable > Parameters (SFDP) tables") > Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger > --- > Cyrille, > > I'm not sure what exactly you wanted to test. > Maybe it makes sense casting header.major to s8 before checking against < 0? > > Thanks, > //richard > --- > drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c > index d71765739a93..4b86decdf13e 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c > @@ -2252,8 +2252,7 @@ static int spi_nor_parse_sfdp(struct spi_nor *nor, > > /* Check the SFDP header version. */ > if (le32_to_cpu(header.signature) != SFDP_SIGNATURE || > - header.major != SFDP_JESD216_MAJOR || > - header.minor < SFDP_JESD216_MINOR) > + header.major != SFDP_JESD216_MAJOR) > return -EINVAL; > > /*
[PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: Kill check with no effect
header.major is of type u8 and cannot be negative. Detected by CoverityScan CID#1417858 ("Integer handling issues") Fixes: f384b352cbf0 ("mtd: spi-nor: parse Serial Flash Discoverable Parameters (SFDP) tables") Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger--- Cyrille, I'm not sure what exactly you wanted to test. Maybe it makes sense casting header.major to s8 before checking against < 0? Thanks, //richard --- drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c index d71765739a93..4b86decdf13e 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c @@ -2252,8 +2252,7 @@ static int spi_nor_parse_sfdp(struct spi_nor *nor, /* Check the SFDP header version. */ if (le32_to_cpu(header.signature) != SFDP_SIGNATURE || - header.major != SFDP_JESD216_MAJOR || - header.minor < SFDP_JESD216_MINOR) + header.major != SFDP_JESD216_MAJOR) return -EINVAL; /* -- 2.13.5
[PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: Kill check with no effect
header.major is of type u8 and cannot be negative. Detected by CoverityScan CID#1417858 ("Integer handling issues") Fixes: f384b352cbf0 ("mtd: spi-nor: parse Serial Flash Discoverable Parameters (SFDP) tables") Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger --- Cyrille, I'm not sure what exactly you wanted to test. Maybe it makes sense casting header.major to s8 before checking against < 0? Thanks, //richard --- drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c index d71765739a93..4b86decdf13e 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c @@ -2252,8 +2252,7 @@ static int spi_nor_parse_sfdp(struct spi_nor *nor, /* Check the SFDP header version. */ if (le32_to_cpu(header.signature) != SFDP_SIGNATURE || - header.major != SFDP_JESD216_MAJOR || - header.minor < SFDP_JESD216_MINOR) + header.major != SFDP_JESD216_MAJOR) return -EINVAL; /* -- 2.13.5