On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 09:17:18AM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thursday 13 December 2007 12:09:23 am Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 09:21:41AM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 12 December 2007 03:11:23 am Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at
On Thursday 13 December 2007 12:09:23 am Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 09:21:41AM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Wednesday 12 December 2007 03:11:23 am Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:08:59PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 11 December
On Thursday 13 December 2007 12:09:23 am Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 09:21:41AM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 03:11:23 am Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:08:59PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Tuesday 11 December 2007
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 09:17:18AM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Thursday 13 December 2007 12:09:23 am Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 09:21:41AM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 03:11:23 am Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 09:21:41AM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 December 2007 03:11:23 am Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:08:59PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 11 December 2007 01:52:55 pm Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > > From what i can roughly
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 03:11:23 am Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:08:59PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Tuesday 11 December 2007 01:52:55 pm Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > From what i can roughly tell so far it seems like an resource conflict
> > > between acpi and
Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:08:59PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 01:52:55 pm Borislav Petkov wrote:
From what i can roughly tell so far it seems like an resource conflict between
acpi and
the pnp requested regions in your patch which
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:08:59PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 December 2007 01:52:55 pm Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > From what i can roughly tell so far it seems like an resource conflict
> > between acpi and
> > the pnp requested regions in your patch which result in the
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:08:59PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 01:52:55 pm Borislav Petkov wrote:
From what i can roughly tell so far it seems like an resource conflict
between acpi and
the pnp requested regions in your patch which result in the acpi_thermal
Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:08:59PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 01:52:55 pm Borislav Petkov wrote:
From what i can roughly tell so far it seems like an resource conflict between
acpi and
the pnp requested regions in your patch which
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 03:11:23 am Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:08:59PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 01:52:55 pm Borislav Petkov wrote:
From what i can roughly tell so far it seems like an resource conflict
between acpi and
the
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 09:21:41AM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 03:11:23 am Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:08:59PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 01:52:55 pm Borislav Petkov wrote:
From what i can roughly tell so
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 01:52:55 pm Borislav Petkov wrote:
> From what i can roughly tell so far it seems like an resource conflict
> between acpi and
> the pnp requested regions in your patch which result in the acpi_thermal code
> to read the wrong (0xff) temperature value and halt the
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 01:00:24PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 December 2007 10:44:43 am Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 10:19:47AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 08:50:02AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > > Hi Andrew,
> > > > Hi
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 10:44:43 am Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 10:19:47AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 08:50:02AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > Hi Andrew,
> > > Hi Len,
> > >
> > > after booting 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 (2.6.24-rc4-190-g94545ba,
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 10:19:47AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 08:50:02AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> > Hi Len,
> >
> > after booting 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 (2.6.24-rc4-190-g94545ba, otoh, boots just
> > fine) on my asus laptop, the machine reboots after
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 10:19:47AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 08:50:02AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Hi Len,
after booting 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 (2.6.24-rc4-190-g94545ba, otoh, boots just
fine) on my asus laptop, the machine reboots after claiming that
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 10:44:43 am Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 10:19:47AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 08:50:02AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Hi Len,
after booting 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 (2.6.24-rc4-190-g94545ba, otoh, boots
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 01:00:24PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 10:44:43 am Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 10:19:47AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 08:50:02AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Hi Len,
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 01:52:55 pm Borislav Petkov wrote:
From what i can roughly tell so far it seems like an resource conflict
between acpi and
the pnp requested regions in your patch which result in the acpi_thermal code
to read the wrong (0xff) temperature value and halt the machine,
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 08:50:02AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> Hi Len,
>
> after booting 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 (2.6.24-rc4-190-g94545ba, otoh, boots just
> fine) on my asus laptop, the machine reboots after claiming that
> "Critical temperature reached (255 C)." However, the degrees
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 08:50:02AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Hi Len,
after booting 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 (2.6.24-rc4-190-g94545ba, otoh, boots just
fine) on my asus laptop, the machine reboots after claiming that
Critical temperature reached (255 C). However, the degrees number
is
Hi Andrew,
Hi Len,
after booting 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 (2.6.24-rc4-190-g94545ba, otoh, boots just
fine) on my asus laptop, the machine reboots after claiming that
"Critical temperature reached (255 C)." However, the degrees number
is kinda hinting at 0xff all-ones field. Will try dump_stack in
Hi Andrew,
Hi Len,
after booting 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 (2.6.24-rc4-190-g94545ba, otoh, boots just
fine) on my asus laptop, the machine reboots after claiming that
Critical temperature reached (255 C). However, the degrees number
is kinda hinting at 0xff all-ones field. Will try dump_stack in
24 matches
Mail list logo
