On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 12:44:37PM -0700, Nish Aravamudan wrote:
> It looks like all callers of these functions pass in milliseconds? Any
> chance you can get rid of these two and use msleep_interruptible() and
> msleep() instead? As long as you are not using these functions around
> wait-queues,
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 12:44:37PM -0700, Nish Aravamudan wrote:
It looks like all callers of these functions pass in milliseconds? Any
chance you can get rid of these two and use msleep_interruptible() and
msleep() instead? As long as you are not using these functions around
wait-queues, you
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 10:36:57PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On 9/6/05, Harald Welte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> [snip]
> >
> > Please consider mergin mainline, thanks.
> >
> [snip]
>
> Wouldn't it be better to first merge it in -mm and get some wider
> testing before pushing
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 10:36:57PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
On 9/6/05, Harald Welte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
[snip]
Please consider mergin mainline, thanks.
[snip]
Wouldn't it be better to first merge it in -mm and get some wider
testing before pushing for mainline?
From
On 9/6/05, Harald Welte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
[snip]
>
> Please consider mergin mainline, thanks.
>
[snip]
Wouldn't it be better to first merge it in -mm and get some wider
testing before pushing for mainline?
--
Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Don't top-post
On 9/6/05, Harald Welte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Following-up to the Cardman 4040 driver, I'm now sumitting a driver for
> the Cardman 4000 reader. It is, too, a PCMCIA smartcard reader and the
> predecessor of the 4040.
>
> From a technical point of view, the two devices have
On 9/5/05, Harald Welte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Following-up to the Cardman 4040 driver, I'm now sumitting a driver for
> the Cardman 4000 reader. It is, too, a PCMCIA smartcard reader and the
> predecessor of the 4040.
>
> From a technical point of view, the two devices have
On 9/5/05, Harald Welte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Following-up to the Cardman 4040 driver, I'm now sumitting a driver for
the Cardman 4000 reader. It is, too, a PCMCIA smartcard reader and the
predecessor of the 4040.
From a technical point of view, the two devices have nothing in
On 9/6/05, Harald Welte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Following-up to the Cardman 4040 driver, I'm now sumitting a driver for
the Cardman 4000 reader. It is, too, a PCMCIA smartcard reader and the
predecessor of the 4040.
From a technical point of view, the two devices have nothing in
On 9/6/05, Harald Welte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
[snip]
Please consider mergin mainline, thanks.
[snip]
Wouldn't it be better to first merge it in -mm and get some wider
testing before pushing for mainline?
--
Jesper Juhl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Don't top-post
10 matches
Mail list logo