On 02/12/2018 07:17 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 02/12/2018 04:10 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
>> On 02/12/2018 05:57 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> That is debatable, is there a good publicly available table of what the
>>> typical L1 cache line size is on ARMv8 platforms?
With a server hat on...
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 03:45:23PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On many platforms, including, but not limited to Brahma-B53 platforms,
> the L1 cache line size is 64bytes. Increasing the value to 128bytes
> appears to be creating performance problems for workloads involving
> network drivers an
On 02/12/2018 04:10 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On 02/12/2018 05:57 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> That is debatable, is there a good publicly available table of what the
>> typical L1 cache line size is on ARMv8 platforms?
>
> I don't have that, but I was under the impression that we moved from 6
> t
On 02/12/2018 05:57 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
That is debatable, is there a good publicly available table of what the
typical L1 cache line size is on ARMv8 platforms?
I don't have that, but I was under the impression that we moved from 6
to 7 because more and more ARMv8 platforms have 128-b
On 02/12/2018 03:52 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On 02/12/2018 05:45 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> +config ARM64_L1_CACHE_SHIFT
>> + int
>> + default 7 if ARM64_L1_CACHE_SHIFT_7
>> + default 6
>
> Shouldn't this be the other way around? Everyone is used to 7 now, so
> you're changing the def
On 02/12/2018 05:45 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
+config ARM64_L1_CACHE_SHIFT
+ int
+ default 7 if ARM64_L1_CACHE_SHIFT_7
+ default 6
Shouldn't this be the other way around? Everyone is used to 7 now, so
you're changing the default back to 6. I would think that it should be
6 matches
Mail list logo
