On 03/06/2020 00:01, David Miller wrote:
> From: Nikolay Aleksandrov
> Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 10:23:09 +0300
>
>> On 01/06/2020 21:06, David Miller wrote:
>>> From: patrickeigens...@gmail.com
>>> Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 13:12:01 +0200
>>>
From: Patrick Eigensatz
After allocating
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 10:23:09 +0300
> On 01/06/2020 21:06, David Miller wrote:
>> From: patrickeigens...@gmail.com
>> Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 13:12:01 +0200
>>
>>> From: Patrick Eigensatz
>>>
>>> After allocating the spare nexthop group it should be tested for
On 02/06/2020 10:23, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> On 01/06/2020 21:06, David Miller wrote:
>> From: patrickeigens...@gmail.com
>> Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 13:12:01 +0200
>>
>>> From: Patrick Eigensatz
>>>
>>> After allocating the spare nexthop group it should be tested for kzalloc()
>>> returning
On 01/06/2020 21:06, David Miller wrote:
> From: patrickeigens...@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 13:12:01 +0200
>
>> From: Patrick Eigensatz
>>
>> After allocating the spare nexthop group it should be tested for kzalloc()
>> returning NULL, instead the already used nexthop group (which
From: patrickeigens...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 13:12:01 +0200
> From: Patrick Eigensatz
>
> After allocating the spare nexthop group it should be tested for kzalloc()
> returning NULL, instead the already used nexthop group (which cannot be
> NULL at this point) had been tested so far.
On 01/06/2020 14:12, patrickeigens...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Patrick Eigensatz
>
> After allocating the spare nexthop group it should be tested for kzalloc()
> returning NULL, instead the already used nexthop group (which cannot be
> NULL at this point) had been tested so far.
>
>
6 matches
Mail list logo