On Mon, 24 Dec 2012 11:16:52 -0500, Jun Chen wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 19:06 +, Grant Likely wrote:
> > The problem is that I don't understand why this change is necessary.
> > spi_devices should always be children of an spi_master, not siblings.
> > What is the problem you're trying to
On Mon, 24 Dec 2012 11:16:52 -0500, Jun Chen jun.d.c...@intel.com wrote:
On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 19:06 +, Grant Likely wrote:
The problem is that I don't understand why this change is necessary.
spi_devices should always be children of an spi_master, not siblings.
What is the problem
On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 19:06 +, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 12:39:52 -0500, Jun Chen wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 16:21 +, Grant Likely wrote:
> > > On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 09:04:16 +, Mark Brown
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 04:44:03AM -0500, Jun Chen
On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 19:06 +, Grant Likely wrote:
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 12:39:52 -0500, Jun Chen jun.d.c...@intel.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 16:21 +, Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 09:04:16 +, Mark Brown
broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 12:39:52 -0500, Jun Chen wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 16:21 +, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 09:04:16 +, Mark Brown
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 04:44:03AM -0500, Jun Chen wrote:
> > >
> > > > This spi_alloc_device function will be called
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 12:39:52 -0500, Jun Chen jun.d.c...@intel.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 16:21 +, Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 09:04:16 +, Mark Brown
broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 04:44:03AM -0500, Jun Chen wrote:
This
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 16:21 +, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 09:04:16 +, Mark Brown
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 04:44:03AM -0500, Jun Chen wrote:
> >
> > > This spi_alloc_device function will be called in the spi_new_device
> > > function to alloc new device as the
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 16:21 +, Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 09:04:16 +, Mark Brown
broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 04:44:03AM -0500, Jun Chen wrote:
This spi_alloc_device function will be called in the spi_new_device
function to
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 09:04:16 +, Mark Brown
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 04:44:03AM -0500, Jun Chen wrote:
>
> > This spi_alloc_device function will be called in the spi_new_device
> > function to alloc new device as the master. But other way, it is called
> > by the
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 04:44:03AM -0500, Jun Chen wrote:
> This spi_alloc_device function will be called in the spi_new_device
> function to alloc new device as the master. But other way, it is called
> by the of_register_spi_devices function to register new device as the
> children of the
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 04:44:03AM -0500, Jun Chen wrote:
This spi_alloc_device function will be called in the spi_new_device
function to alloc new device as the master. But other way, it is called
by the of_register_spi_devices function to register new device as the
children of the master. I
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 09:04:16 +, Mark Brown
broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 04:44:03AM -0500, Jun Chen wrote:
This spi_alloc_device function will be called in the spi_new_device
function to alloc new device as the master. But other way, it is called
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 15:26 +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:29:34AM -0500, Jun Chen wrote:
>
> > * @master: Controller to which device is connected
> > + * device_was_children_of_master is flag which the device is registed
> > + * as the children of the bus
>
> This isn't
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:29:34AM -0500, Jun Chen wrote:
> * @master: Controller to which device is connected
> + * device_was_children_of_master is flag which the device is registed
> + * as the children of the bus
This isn't a kerneldoc style comment (it needs the @XXX: format). The
name
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:29:34AM -0500, Jun Chen wrote:
* @master: Controller to which device is connected
+ * device_was_children_of_master is flag which the device is registed
+ * as the children of the bus
This isn't a kerneldoc style comment (it needs the @XXX: format). The
name is
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 15:26 +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:29:34AM -0500, Jun Chen wrote:
* @master: Controller to which device is connected
+ * device_was_children_of_master is flag which the device is registed
+ * as the children of the bus
This isn't a
16 matches
Mail list logo
