On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 10:01:46AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 09:56:40AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 07:45:00PM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > This pair of patches improves our preempt_enable() implementation slightly
> > > on arm64 by
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 10:01:46AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 09:56:40AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 07:45:00PM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > This pair of patches improves our preempt_enable() implementation slightly
> > > on arm64 by
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 09:56:40AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 07:45:00PM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This pair of patches improves our preempt_enable() implementation slightly
> > on arm64 by making the resulting call to preempt_schedule() conditional
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 09:56:40AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 07:45:00PM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This pair of patches improves our preempt_enable() implementation slightly
> > on arm64 by making the resulting call to preempt_schedule() conditional
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 07:45:00PM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This pair of patches improves our preempt_enable() implementation slightly
> on arm64 by making the resulting call to preempt_schedule() conditional
> on need_resched(), which is tracked in bit 32 of the preempt count. The
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 07:45:00PM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This pair of patches improves our preempt_enable() implementation slightly
> on arm64 by making the resulting call to preempt_schedule() conditional
> on need_resched(), which is tracked in bit 32 of the preempt count. The
6 matches
Mail list logo