On Thu, 5 Mar 2015 06:05:20 + Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 04:21:21PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> > Hi Al (and others),
> >
> > I wonder if you could look over this patchset.
> > It allows RCU-walk to follow symlinks in many common cases,
> > thus removing a surprising
On Thu, 5 Mar 2015 06:05:20 + Al Viro v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 04:21:21PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
Hi Al (and others),
I wonder if you could look over this patchset.
It allows RCU-walk to follow symlinks in many common cases,
thus removing a
On Thu, 5 Mar 2015 06:05:20 + Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 04:21:21PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> > Hi Al (and others),
> >
> > I wonder if you could look over this patchset.
> > It allows RCU-walk to follow symlinks in many common cases,
> > thus removing a surprising
> "Al" == Al Viro writes:
Al> On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 08:52:20AM -0500, John Stoffel wrote:
>> So what happens if your filesystem is 10Tb in size, and you have 50
>> million files and lots of them are symlinks? I've got developers who
>> do shit like this and wonder why performance
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 08:52:20AM -0500, John Stoffel wrote:
> So what happens if your filesystem is 10Tb in size, and you have 50
> million files and lots of them are symlinks? I've got developers who
> do shit like this and wonder why performance sucks and I just
> worry that GPF_KERNEL
> "Al" == Al Viro writes:
Al> On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 04:21:21PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
>> Hi Al (and others),
>>
>> I wonder if you could look over this patchset.
>> It allows RCU-walk to follow symlinks in many common cases,
>> thus removing a surprising performance hit caused by using
On Thu, 5 Mar 2015 06:05:20 + Al Viro v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 04:21:21PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
Hi Al (and others),
I wonder if you could look over this patchset.
It allows RCU-walk to follow symlinks in many common cases,
thus removing a
Al == Al Viro v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk writes:
Al On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 08:52:20AM -0500, John Stoffel wrote:
So what happens if your filesystem is 10Tb in size, and you have 50
million files and lots of them are symlinks? I've got developers who
do shit like this and wonder why performance
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 08:52:20AM -0500, John Stoffel wrote:
So what happens if your filesystem is 10Tb in size, and you have 50
million files and lots of them are symlinks? I've got developers who
do shit like this and wonder why performance sucks and I just
worry that GPF_KERNEL is a
Al == Al Viro v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk writes:
Al On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 04:21:21PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
Hi Al (and others),
I wonder if you could look over this patchset.
It allows RCU-walk to follow symlinks in many common cases,
thus removing a surprising performance hit caused by
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 04:21:21PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> Hi Al (and others),
>
> I wonder if you could look over this patchset.
> It allows RCU-walk to follow symlinks in many common cases,
> thus removing a surprising performance hit caused by using symlinks.
>
> The last could of
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 04:21:21PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
Hi Al (and others),
I wonder if you could look over this patchset.
It allows RCU-walk to follow symlinks in many common cases,
thus removing a surprising performance hit caused by using symlinks.
The last could of patches make
12 matches
Mail list logo