Hi,
On Thu, 2017-04-27 at 20:55 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Ryder Lee wrote:
> > On Tue, 2017-04-25 at 14:38 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Ryder Lee wrote:
>
> >> > +static
Hi,
On Thu, 2017-04-27 at 20:55 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Ryder Lee wrote:
> > On Tue, 2017-04-25 at 14:38 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Ryder Lee wrote:
>
> >> > +static int mtk_pcie_enable_ports(struct mtk_pcie *pcie)
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Ryder Lee wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-04-25 at 14:38 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Ryder Lee wrote:
>> > +static int mtk_pcie_enable_ports(struct mtk_pcie *pcie)
>> > +{
>> > +
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Ryder Lee wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-04-25 at 14:38 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Ryder Lee wrote:
>> > +static int mtk_pcie_enable_ports(struct mtk_pcie *pcie)
>> > +{
>> > + struct device *dev = pcie->dev;
>> > +
Hi,
On Tue, 2017-04-25 at 14:38 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Ryder Lee wrote:
>
> > +static inline bool mtk_pcie_link_is_up(struct mtk_pcie_port *port)
> > +{
> > + return !!(readl_relaxed(port->base + PCIE_LINK_STATUS) &
> > +
Hi,
On Tue, 2017-04-25 at 14:38 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Ryder Lee wrote:
>
> > +static inline bool mtk_pcie_link_is_up(struct mtk_pcie_port *port)
> > +{
> > + return !!(readl_relaxed(port->base + PCIE_LINK_STATUS) &
> > +
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Ryder Lee wrote:
> +static inline bool mtk_pcie_link_is_up(struct mtk_pcie_port *port)
> +{
> + return !!(readl_relaxed(port->base + PCIE_LINK_STATUS) &
> + PCIE_PORT_LINKUP);
> +}
If this is not performance
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Ryder Lee wrote:
> +static inline bool mtk_pcie_link_is_up(struct mtk_pcie_port *port)
> +{
> + return !!(readl_relaxed(port->base + PCIE_LINK_STATUS) &
> + PCIE_PORT_LINKUP);
> +}
If this is not performance critical, please use the
Hi,
On Mon, 2017-04-24 at 17:02 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> Hi Ryder,
>
> Looks good, but I have a few questions below.
>
> On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 04:19:02PM +0800, Ryder Lee wrote:
> > Add support for the Mediatek PCIe controller which can be found
> > on MT7623A/N, MT2701 and MT8521p
Hi,
On Mon, 2017-04-24 at 17:02 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> Hi Ryder,
>
> Looks good, but I have a few questions below.
>
> On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 04:19:02PM +0800, Ryder Lee wrote:
> > Add support for the Mediatek PCIe controller which can be found
> > on MT7623A/N, MT2701 and MT8521p
Hi Ryder,
Looks good, but I have a few questions below.
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 04:19:02PM +0800, Ryder Lee wrote:
> Add support for the Mediatek PCIe controller which can be found
> on MT7623A/N, MT2701 and MT8521p platforms.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ryder Lee
> ---
>
Hi Ryder,
Looks good, but I have a few questions below.
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 04:19:02PM +0800, Ryder Lee wrote:
> Add support for the Mediatek PCIe controller which can be found
> on MT7623A/N, MT2701 and MT8521p platforms.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ryder Lee
> ---
> drivers/pci/host/Kconfig
Hi Ryder,
[auto build test WARNING on pci/next]
[also build test WARNING on v4.11-rc7 next-20170421]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
Hi Ryder,
[auto build test WARNING on pci/next]
[also build test WARNING on v4.11-rc7 next-20170421]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
14 matches
Mail list logo