Re: [PATCH 3.8-stable] sched/debug: Fix sd->*_idx limit range avoiding overflow

2013-04-16 Thread Ingo Molnar
* libin wrote: > On 2013/4/15 22:15, Jonghwan Choi wrote: > > From: libin > > > > This patch looks like it should be in the 3.8-stable tree, should we apply > > it? > > > > yes, I think this patch should be applied to the 3.8-stable tree. Thanks. > Libin Since this is a debug interface

Re: [PATCH 3.8-stable] sched/debug: Fix sd-*_idx limit range avoiding overflow

2013-04-16 Thread Ingo Molnar
* libin huawei.li...@huawei.com wrote: On 2013/4/15 22:15, Jonghwan Choi wrote: From: libin huawei.li...@huawei.com This patch looks like it should be in the 3.8-stable tree, should we apply it? yes, I think this patch should be applied to the 3.8-stable tree. Thanks. Libin

Re: [PATCH 3.8-stable] sched/debug: Fix sd->*_idx limit range avoiding overflow

2013-04-15 Thread libin
On 2013/4/15 22:15, Jonghwan Choi wrote: > From: libin > > This patch looks like it should be in the 3.8-stable tree, should we apply > it? > yes, I think this patch should be applied to the 3.8-stable tree. Thanks. Libin > -- > > From: "libin " > > commit

Re: [PATCH 3.8-stable] sched/debug: Fix sd-*_idx limit range avoiding overflow

2013-04-15 Thread libin
On 2013/4/15 22:15, Jonghwan Choi wrote: From: libin huawei.li...@huawei.com This patch looks like it should be in the 3.8-stable tree, should we apply it? yes, I think this patch should be applied to the 3.8-stable tree. Thanks. Libin -- From: libin