I've updated the bug some more with more info
I can't replicate this on RHEL7 with GCC 4.8.5 or GCC 7.3.1
My GCC is as follows:
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/9.2.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with:
/var/tmp/p
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019, Mike Lothian wrote:
>
> I'm using GCC 9.2, binutils 2.32. I used to use the gold linker but
> I've just switched back to using ld.bfd based on this discussion
>
> My .config can be found at:
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/FireBurn/KernelStuff/master/dot_config_tip
Does t
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 at 14:08, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2019, Mike Lothian wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 at 12:09, Mike Lothian wrote:
> > >
> > > As it's related. I've raised
> > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204495 about the
> > > relocatition I'm seeing since s
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019, Mike Lothian wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 at 12:09, Mike Lothian wrote:
> >
> > As it's related. I've raised
> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204495 about the
> > relocatition I'm seeing since switching back to ld.bfd - is this safe
> > to ignore? I'm guessing t
On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 at 12:09, Mike Lothian wrote:
>
> As it's related. I've raised
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204495 about the
> relocatition I'm seeing since switching back to ld.bfd - is this safe
> to ignore? I'm guessing this is why gold isn't working as it can't do
> them
>
On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 at 07:59, Greg KH wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:20:34PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Jul 2019, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 24 Jul 2019, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 06:03:41PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > > > Gotta
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:20:34PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2019, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 24 Jul 2019, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 06:03:41PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > > Gotta love old tool-chains :(
> > > >
> > > > Oh yes. /me does
On Wed, 24 Jul 2019, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2019, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 06:03:41PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > Gotta love old tool-chains :(
> > >
> > > Oh yes. /me does archaeology to find a VM with old stuff
> >
> > I can provide a binary if you
On Wed, 24 Jul 2019, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 06:03:41PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > Gotta love old tool-chains :(
> >
> > Oh yes. /me does archaeology to find a VM with old stuff
>
> I can provide a binary if you can't find anything.
Found GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 05:57:35PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> Wait, does clang link things itself and not need ld?
There's ld.lld; which might be used by your clang.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 06:03:41PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2019, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 05:49:45PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > Ok, I dug around and the gold linker is not being used here, only clang
> > > > to build the source and GNU ld to link,
On Wed, 24 Jul 2019, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 05:49:45PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > Ok, I dug around and the gold linker is not being used here, only clang
> > > to build the source and GNU ld to link, and I am still seeing this
> > > error.
> >
> > Odd combo.
>
> I'm not
On Wed, 24 Jul 2019, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2019, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 03:44:54PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > > Sorry, I saw that after writing that. You are right, if the others
> > > don't object, that's fine with me. I'll go poke the various build
> > > sys
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 05:49:45PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2019, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 03:44:54PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > > Sorry, I saw that after writing that. You are right, if the others
> > > don't object, that's fine with me. I'll go poke the va
On Wed, 24 Jul 2019, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 03:44:54PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > Sorry, I saw that after writing that. You are right, if the others
> > don't object, that's fine with me. I'll go poke the various build
> > systems that are failing right now on 5.3-rc1 and try to
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 03:44:54PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 03:31:32PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Tue, 23 Jul 2019, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 01:16:48PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Since building a workable kernel for differen
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 03:31:32PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jul 2019, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 01:16:48PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> > > Since building a workable kernel for different kernel configurations
> > > isn't a
> > > requirement for gold, I
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 03:05:14PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 01:16:48PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 3:35 AM Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 15 Jul 2019, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 15 Jul 2019, Mike Lothian wrote:
> > > > > That bui
On Tue, 23 Jul 2019, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 01:16:48PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > >
> >
> > Since building a workable kernel for different kernel configurations isn't a
> > requirement for gold, I don't recommend gold for kernel.
>
> Um, it worked before this commit, and now it d
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 01:16:48PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 3:35 AM Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 15 Jul 2019, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > On Mon, 15 Jul 2019, Mike Lothian wrote:
> > > > That build failure is from the current tip of Linus's tree
> > > > If the fix
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 3:35 AM Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2019, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Jul 2019, Mike Lothian wrote:
> > > That build failure is from the current tip of Linus's tree
> > > If the fix is in, then it hasn't fixed the issue
> >
> > The reverted commit ca
On Mon, 15 Jul 2019, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2019, Mike Lothian wrote:
> > That build failure is from the current tip of Linus's tree
> > If the fix is in, then it hasn't fixed the issue
>
> The reverted commit caused a build fail with gold as well. Let me stare at
> your issue.
S
On Mon, 15 Jul 2019, Mike Lothian wrote:
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?
> That build failure is from
On Sun, 14 Jul 2019, Mike Lothian wrote:
> Will the fix be in the next RC?
As I said, it's upstream already, so yes.
Will the fix be in the next RC?
On Sun, 14 Jul 2019 at 11:16, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> On Sat, 13 Jul 2019, Mike Lothian wrote:
>
> > This appears to be causing issues with gold again:
> >
> > axion /usr/src/linux # make
> > CALLscripts/checksyscalls.sh
> > CALLscripts/atomic/check-
On Sat, 13 Jul 2019, Mike Lothian wrote:
> This appears to be causing issues with gold again:
>
> axion /usr/src/linux # make
> CALLscripts/checksyscalls.sh
> CALLscripts/atomic/check-atomics.sh
> DESCEND objtool
> CHK include/generated/compile.h
> VDSOCHK arch/x86/entry/vd
26 matches
Mail list logo
