Re: [PATCHv2] reset: ti-rstctrl: use the reset-simple driver

2018-03-09 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Rob Herring [180308 22:27]: > On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:02 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > In PRM, there are also registers for each interconnect device > > context lost and wake-up dependencies. We don't have a driver > > for that yet, it's handled by the SoC init code currently. > > Regardless

Re: [PATCHv2] reset: ti-rstctrl: use the reset-simple driver

2018-03-08 Thread Rob Herring
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:02 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > Hi, > > * Rob Herring [180308 02:49]: >> On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 10:21:43AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: >> > +TI RSTCTRL Reset Controller >> > + >> > +Required properties: >> > +- compatible : "ti,rstctrl" >> > +- reg : Should contain 1 regi

Re: [PATCHv2] reset: ti-rstctrl: use the reset-simple driver

2018-03-08 Thread Tony Lindgren
Hi, * Rob Herring [180308 02:49]: > On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 10:21:43AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > +TI RSTCTRL Reset Controller > > + > > +Required properties: > > +- compatible : "ti,rstctrl" > > +- reg : Should contain 1 register ranges(address and length) > > +- #reset-cells: 1 > > + > > +

Re: [PATCHv2] reset: ti-rstctrl: use the reset-simple driver

2018-03-07 Thread Rob Herring
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 10:21:43AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > We can support the RSTCTRL reset registers on many TI SoCs with > reset-simple. > > Note that some devices will also need to check the RSTST bits > for reset reason. Support for these could be possibly added to > the reset controller