On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 at 12:53, Valentin Schneider
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 06/08/18 11:20, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > Hi Valentin,
> >
> > On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 at 14:33, Valentin Schneider
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 31/07/18 13:17, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> >> [...]
>
> This can
On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 at 12:53, Valentin Schneider
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 06/08/18 11:20, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > Hi Valentin,
> >
> > On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 at 14:33, Valentin Schneider
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 31/07/18 13:17, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> >> [...]
>
> This can
Hi,
On 06/08/18 11:20, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Hi Valentin,
>
> On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 at 14:33, Valentin Schneider
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 31/07/18 13:17, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> [...]
This can easily happen with SD_PREFER_SIBLING enabled too so I wouldn't
say that this
Hi,
On 06/08/18 11:20, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Hi Valentin,
>
> On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 at 14:33, Valentin Schneider
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 31/07/18 13:17, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> [...]
This can easily happen with SD_PREFER_SIBLING enabled too so I wouldn't
say that this
Hi Valentin,
On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 at 14:33, Valentin Schneider
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 31/07/18 13:17, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > On Fri, 6 Jul 2018 at 16:31, Morten Rasmussen
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 12:18:17PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> >>> [...]
> >>
> >> Scheduling
Hi Valentin,
On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 at 14:33, Valentin Schneider
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 31/07/18 13:17, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > On Fri, 6 Jul 2018 at 16:31, Morten Rasmussen
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 12:18:17PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> >>> [...]
> >>
> >> Scheduling
Hi,
On 31/07/18 13:17, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jul 2018 at 16:31, Morten Rasmussen
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 12:18:17PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>>> [...]
>>
>> Scheduling one task per cpu when n_task == n_cpus on asymmetric
>> topologies is generally broken already
Hi,
On 31/07/18 13:17, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jul 2018 at 16:31, Morten Rasmussen
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 12:18:17PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>>> [...]
>>
>> Scheduling one task per cpu when n_task == n_cpus on asymmetric
>> topologies is generally broken already
On Fri, 6 Jul 2018 at 16:31, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 12:18:17PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > On Wed, 4 Jul 2018 at 12:18, Morten Rasmussen
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > The 'prefer sibling' sched_domain flag is intended to encourage
> > > spreading tasks to sibling
On Fri, 6 Jul 2018 at 16:31, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 12:18:17PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > On Wed, 4 Jul 2018 at 12:18, Morten Rasmussen
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > The 'prefer sibling' sched_domain flag is intended to encourage
> > > spreading tasks to sibling
On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 12:18:17PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jul 2018 at 12:18, Morten Rasmussen
> wrote:
> >
> > The 'prefer sibling' sched_domain flag is intended to encourage
> > spreading tasks to sibling sched_domain to take advantage of more caches
> > and core for SMT
On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 12:18:17PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jul 2018 at 12:18, Morten Rasmussen
> wrote:
> >
> > The 'prefer sibling' sched_domain flag is intended to encourage
> > spreading tasks to sibling sched_domain to take advantage of more caches
> > and core for SMT
On Wed, 4 Jul 2018 at 12:18, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
>
> The 'prefer sibling' sched_domain flag is intended to encourage
> spreading tasks to sibling sched_domain to take advantage of more caches
> and core for SMT systems. It has recently been changed to be on all
> non-NUMA topology level.
On Wed, 4 Jul 2018 at 12:18, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
>
> The 'prefer sibling' sched_domain flag is intended to encourage
> spreading tasks to sibling sched_domain to take advantage of more caches
> and core for SMT systems. It has recently been changed to be on all
> non-NUMA topology level.
14 matches
Mail list logo