Re: 2.6.20*: PATA DMA timeout, hangs (2)

2007-03-19 Thread Tejun Heo
Alistair John Strachan wrote: On Monday 12 March 2007 13:25, Frank van Maarseveen wrote: [snip] So, are /dev/hd* going to disappear in a few years? iow, does it make sense to _slowly_ start to migrate to /dev/sd*? How would you propose doing this? I'm sure modern distros with an

Re: 2.6.20*: PATA DMA timeout, hangs (2)

2007-03-19 Thread Tejun Heo
Alistair John Strachan wrote: On Monday 12 March 2007 13:25, Frank van Maarseveen wrote: [snip] So, are /dev/hd* going to disappear in a few years? iow, does it make sense to _slowly_ start to migrate to /dev/sd*? How would you propose doing this? I'm sure modern distros with an

Re: 2.6.20*: PATA DMA timeout, hangs (2)

2007-03-13 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
On Tuesday 13 March 2007, Frank van Maarseveen wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 09:40:25PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > On Monday 12 March 2007, Frank van Maarseveen wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 01:21:18PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > > >

Re: 2.6.20*: PATA DMA timeout, hangs (2)

2007-03-13 Thread Frank van Maarseveen
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 09:40:25PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > Hi, > > On Monday 12 March 2007, Frank van Maarseveen wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 01:21:18PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Could you check if this is the same problem as

Re: 2.6.20*: PATA DMA timeout, hangs (2)

2007-03-13 Thread Frank van Maarseveen
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 09:40:25PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: Hi, On Monday 12 March 2007, Frank van Maarseveen wrote: On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 01:21:18PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: Hi, Could you check if this is the same problem as this one:

Re: 2.6.20*: PATA DMA timeout, hangs (2)

2007-03-13 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
On Tuesday 13 March 2007, Frank van Maarseveen wrote: On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 09:40:25PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: Hi, On Monday 12 March 2007, Frank van Maarseveen wrote: On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 01:21:18PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: Hi,

Re: 2.6.20*: PATA DMA timeout, hangs (2)

2007-03-12 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Hi, On Monday 12 March 2007, Frank van Maarseveen wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 01:21:18PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Could you check if this is the same problem as this one: > > > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8169 > > Looks like it except

Re: 2.6.20*: PATA DMA timeout, hangs (2)

2007-03-12 Thread Alistair John Strachan
On Monday 12 March 2007 13:25, Frank van Maarseveen wrote: [snip] > So, are /dev/hd* going to disappear in a few years? iow, does it make > sense to _slowly_ start to migrate to /dev/sd*? How would you propose doing this? I'm sure modern distros with an initrd/initramfs probably already do some

Re: 2.6.20*: PATA DMA timeout, hangs (2)

2007-03-12 Thread Frank van Maarseveen
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 12:07:18PM +, Alistair John Strachan wrote: > On Monday 12 March 2007 11:24, Frank van Maarseveen wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 09:54:47AM +0100, Frank van Maarseveen wrote: > > > 2.6.19 is ok, 2.6.20.[12] hangs from the moment DMA is turned on (hdparm > > > -d 1

Re: 2.6.20*: PATA DMA timeout, hangs (2)

2007-03-12 Thread Frank van Maarseveen
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 01:21:18PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > Hi, > > Could you check if this is the same problem as this one: > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8169 Looks like it except that I don't see "lost interrupt" messages here. So, it might be something

Re: 2.6.20*: PATA DMA timeout, hangs (2)

2007-03-12 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Hi, Could you check if this is the same problem as this one: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8169 Thanks, Bart On Monday 12 March 2007, Frank van Maarseveen wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 09:54:47AM +0100, Frank van Maarseveen wrote: > > > > 2.6.19 is ok, 2.6.20.[12] hangs from

Re: 2.6.20*: PATA DMA timeout, hangs (2)

2007-03-12 Thread Alistair John Strachan
On Monday 12 March 2007 11:24, Frank van Maarseveen wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 09:54:47AM +0100, Frank van Maarseveen wrote: > > 2.6.19 is ok, 2.6.20.[12] hangs from the moment DMA is turned on (hdparm > > -d 1 /dev/hda): > > > > hda: dma_timer_expiry: dma status == 0x20 > > hda: DMA

Re: 2.6.20*: PATA DMA timeout, hangs (2)

2007-03-12 Thread Alistair John Strachan
On Monday 12 March 2007 11:24, Frank van Maarseveen wrote: On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 09:54:47AM +0100, Frank van Maarseveen wrote: 2.6.19 is ok, 2.6.20.[12] hangs from the moment DMA is turned on (hdparm -d 1 /dev/hda): hda: dma_timer_expiry: dma status == 0x20 hda: DMA timeout

Re: 2.6.20*: PATA DMA timeout, hangs (2)

2007-03-12 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Hi, Could you check if this is the same problem as this one: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8169 Thanks, Bart On Monday 12 March 2007, Frank van Maarseveen wrote: On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 09:54:47AM +0100, Frank van Maarseveen wrote: 2.6.19 is ok, 2.6.20.[12] hangs from the

Re: 2.6.20*: PATA DMA timeout, hangs (2)

2007-03-12 Thread Frank van Maarseveen
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 01:21:18PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: Hi, Could you check if this is the same problem as this one: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8169 Looks like it except that I don't see lost interrupt messages here. So, it might be something different

Re: 2.6.20*: PATA DMA timeout, hangs (2)

2007-03-12 Thread Frank van Maarseveen
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 12:07:18PM +, Alistair John Strachan wrote: On Monday 12 March 2007 11:24, Frank van Maarseveen wrote: On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 09:54:47AM +0100, Frank van Maarseveen wrote: 2.6.19 is ok, 2.6.20.[12] hangs from the moment DMA is turned on (hdparm -d 1 /dev/hda):

Re: 2.6.20*: PATA DMA timeout, hangs (2)

2007-03-12 Thread Alistair John Strachan
On Monday 12 March 2007 13:25, Frank van Maarseveen wrote: [snip] So, are /dev/hd* going to disappear in a few years? iow, does it make sense to _slowly_ start to migrate to /dev/sd*? How would you propose doing this? I'm sure modern distros with an initrd/initramfs probably already do some

Re: 2.6.20*: PATA DMA timeout, hangs (2)

2007-03-12 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Hi, On Monday 12 March 2007, Frank van Maarseveen wrote: On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 01:21:18PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: Hi, Could you check if this is the same problem as this one: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8169 Looks like it except that I don't