Alistair John Strachan wrote:
On Monday 12 March 2007 13:25, Frank van Maarseveen wrote:
[snip]
So, are /dev/hd* going to disappear in a few years? iow, does it make
sense to _slowly_ start to migrate to /dev/sd*?
How would you propose doing this? I'm sure modern distros with an
Alistair John Strachan wrote:
On Monday 12 March 2007 13:25, Frank van Maarseveen wrote:
[snip]
So, are /dev/hd* going to disappear in a few years? iow, does it make
sense to _slowly_ start to migrate to /dev/sd*?
How would you propose doing this? I'm sure modern distros with an
On Tuesday 13 March 2007, Frank van Maarseveen wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 09:40:25PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Monday 12 March 2007, Frank van Maarseveen wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 01:21:18PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > >
>
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 09:40:25PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Monday 12 March 2007, Frank van Maarseveen wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 01:21:18PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Could you check if this is the same problem as
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 09:40:25PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
On Monday 12 March 2007, Frank van Maarseveen wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 01:21:18PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
Could you check if this is the same problem as this one:
On Tuesday 13 March 2007, Frank van Maarseveen wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 09:40:25PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
On Monday 12 March 2007, Frank van Maarseveen wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 01:21:18PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
On Monday 12 March 2007, Frank van Maarseveen wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 01:21:18PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Could you check if this is the same problem as this one:
> >
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8169
>
> Looks like it except
On Monday 12 March 2007 13:25, Frank van Maarseveen wrote:
[snip]
> So, are /dev/hd* going to disappear in a few years? iow, does it make
> sense to _slowly_ start to migrate to /dev/sd*?
How would you propose doing this? I'm sure modern distros with an
initrd/initramfs probably already do some
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 12:07:18PM +, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
> On Monday 12 March 2007 11:24, Frank van Maarseveen wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 09:54:47AM +0100, Frank van Maarseveen wrote:
> > > 2.6.19 is ok, 2.6.20.[12] hangs from the moment DMA is turned on (hdparm
> > > -d 1
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 01:21:18PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Could you check if this is the same problem as this one:
>
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8169
Looks like it except that I don't see "lost interrupt" messages here. So,
it might be something
Hi,
Could you check if this is the same problem as this one:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8169
Thanks,
Bart
On Monday 12 March 2007, Frank van Maarseveen wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 09:54:47AM +0100, Frank van Maarseveen wrote:
> >
> > 2.6.19 is ok, 2.6.20.[12] hangs from
On Monday 12 March 2007 11:24, Frank van Maarseveen wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 09:54:47AM +0100, Frank van Maarseveen wrote:
> > 2.6.19 is ok, 2.6.20.[12] hangs from the moment DMA is turned on (hdparm
> > -d 1 /dev/hda):
> >
> > hda: dma_timer_expiry: dma status == 0x20
> > hda: DMA
On Monday 12 March 2007 11:24, Frank van Maarseveen wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 09:54:47AM +0100, Frank van Maarseveen wrote:
2.6.19 is ok, 2.6.20.[12] hangs from the moment DMA is turned on (hdparm
-d 1 /dev/hda):
hda: dma_timer_expiry: dma status == 0x20
hda: DMA timeout
Hi,
Could you check if this is the same problem as this one:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8169
Thanks,
Bart
On Monday 12 March 2007, Frank van Maarseveen wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 09:54:47AM +0100, Frank van Maarseveen wrote:
2.6.19 is ok, 2.6.20.[12] hangs from the
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 01:21:18PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
Could you check if this is the same problem as this one:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8169
Looks like it except that I don't see lost interrupt messages here. So,
it might be something different
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 12:07:18PM +, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
On Monday 12 March 2007 11:24, Frank van Maarseveen wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 09:54:47AM +0100, Frank van Maarseveen wrote:
2.6.19 is ok, 2.6.20.[12] hangs from the moment DMA is turned on (hdparm
-d 1 /dev/hda):
On Monday 12 March 2007 13:25, Frank van Maarseveen wrote:
[snip]
So, are /dev/hd* going to disappear in a few years? iow, does it make
sense to _slowly_ start to migrate to /dev/sd*?
How would you propose doing this? I'm sure modern distros with an
initrd/initramfs probably already do some
Hi,
On Monday 12 March 2007, Frank van Maarseveen wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 01:21:18PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
Could you check if this is the same problem as this one:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8169
Looks like it except that I don't
18 matches
Mail list logo