Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Monday 27 November 2017 13:13:01 Karel Zak wrote: > On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 08:19:25PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Monday 20 November 2017 12:12:56 Karel Zak wrote: > > > Go ahead and send patch :-) (also with LABEL_FATBOOT=) > > > > Ok, I prepared patches for util-linux including

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Monday 27 November 2017 13:13:01 Karel Zak wrote: > On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 08:19:25PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Monday 20 November 2017 12:12:56 Karel Zak wrote: > > > Go ahead and send patch :-) (also with LABEL_FATBOOT=) > > > > Ok, I prepared patches for util-linux including

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:54:30PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Wednesday 14 February 2018 22:52:33 Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Monday 27 November 2017 13:13:01 Karel Zak wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 08:19:25PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > On Monday 20 November 2017 12:12:56 Karel Zak

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:54:30PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Wednesday 14 February 2018 22:52:33 Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Monday 27 November 2017 13:13:01 Karel Zak wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 08:19:25PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > On Monday 20 November 2017 12:12:56 Karel Zak

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Wednesday 14 February 2018 22:52:33 Pali Rohár wrote: > On Monday 27 November 2017 13:13:01 Karel Zak wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 08:19:25PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > On Monday 20 November 2017 12:12:56 Karel Zak wrote: > > > > Go ahead and send patch :-) (also with LABEL_FATBOOT=)

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Wednesday 14 February 2018 22:52:33 Pali Rohár wrote: > On Monday 27 November 2017 13:13:01 Karel Zak wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 08:19:25PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > On Monday 20 November 2017 12:12:56 Karel Zak wrote: > > > > Go ahead and send patch :-) (also with LABEL_FATBOOT=)

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Monday 27 November 2017 13:13:01 Karel Zak wrote: > On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 08:19:25PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Monday 20 November 2017 12:12:56 Karel Zak wrote: > > > Go ahead and send patch :-) (also with LABEL_FATBOOT=) > > > > Ok, I prepared patches for util-linux including

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Monday 27 November 2017 13:13:01 Karel Zak wrote: > On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 08:19:25PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Monday 20 November 2017 12:12:56 Karel Zak wrote: > > > Go ahead and send patch :-) (also with LABEL_FATBOOT=) > > > > Ok, I prepared patches for util-linux including

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Thursday 30 November 2017 00:21:26 Pali Rohár wrote: > On Monday 20 November 2017 12:12:56 Karel Zak wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 01:44:40PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > On Thursday 09 November 2017 22:21:31 Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > So from all tests and discussion I would propose new

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Thursday 30 November 2017 00:21:26 Pali Rohár wrote: > On Monday 20 November 2017 12:12:56 Karel Zak wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 01:44:40PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > On Thursday 09 November 2017 22:21:31 Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > So from all tests and discussion I would propose new

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Thursday 09 November 2017 22:21:31 Pali Rohár wrote: > So from all tests and discussion I would propose new unification: > > 1. Read label only from the root directory. If label in root directory >is missing then disk would be treated as without label. Label from >boot sector would not

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Thursday 09 November 2017 22:21:31 Pali Rohár wrote: > So from all tests and discussion I would propose new unification: > > 1. Read label only from the root directory. If label in root directory >is missing then disk would be treated as without label. Label from >boot sector would not

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Monday 20 November 2017 12:12:56 Karel Zak wrote: > On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 01:44:40PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Thursday 09 November 2017 22:21:31 Pali Rohár wrote: > > > So from all tests and discussion I would propose new unification: > > > > > > 1. Read label only from the root

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Monday 20 November 2017 12:12:56 Karel Zak wrote: > On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 01:44:40PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Thursday 09 November 2017 22:21:31 Pali Rohár wrote: > > > So from all tests and discussion I would propose new unification: > > > > > > 1. Read label only from the root

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 08:19:25PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Monday 20 November 2017 12:12:56 Karel Zak wrote: > > Go ahead and send patch :-) (also with LABEL_FATBOOT=) > > Ok, I prepared patches for util-linux including LABEL_FATBOOT: >

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 08:19:25PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Monday 20 November 2017 12:12:56 Karel Zak wrote: > > Go ahead and send patch :-) (also with LABEL_FATBOOT=) > > Ok, I prepared patches for util-linux including LABEL_FATBOOT: >

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Monday 20 November 2017 12:12:56 Karel Zak wrote: > Go ahead and send patch :-) (also with LABEL_FATBOOT=) Ok, I prepared patches for util-linux including LABEL_FATBOOT: https://github.com/karelzak/util-linux/compare/master...pali:master I have not created official pull request on github yet

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Monday 20 November 2017 12:12:56 Karel Zak wrote: > Go ahead and send patch :-) (also with LABEL_FATBOOT=) Ok, I prepared patches for util-linux including LABEL_FATBOOT: https://github.com/karelzak/util-linux/compare/master...pali:master I have not created official pull request on github yet

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Wednesday 22 November 2017 12:03:52 Karel Zak wrote: > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 09:52:03AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > > I can prepare patches for blkid (util-linux), but I do not like idea to > > have different algorithm how is read label in fatlabel and blkid. Both > > tools are used by

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Wednesday 22 November 2017 12:03:52 Karel Zak wrote: > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 09:52:03AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > > I can prepare patches for blkid (util-linux), but I do not like idea to > > have different algorithm how is read label in fatlabel and blkid. Both > > tools are used by

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

2017 m. lapkričio 22 d., trečiadienis 11:03:52 GMT rašėte: > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 09:52:03AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > > I can prepare patches for blkid (util-linux), but I do not like idea to > > have different algorithm how is read label in fatlabel and blkid. Both > > tools are used by

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

2017 m. lapkričio 22 d., trečiadienis 11:03:52 GMT rašėte: > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 09:52:03AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > > I can prepare patches for blkid (util-linux), but I do not like idea to > > have different algorithm how is read label in fatlabel and blkid. Both > > tools are used by

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 09:52:03AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > I can prepare patches for blkid (util-linux), but I do not like idea to > have different algorithm how is read label in fatlabel and blkid. Both > tools are used by different GUI programs and it is a bad if one GUI > program on linux

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 09:52:03AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > I can prepare patches for blkid (util-linux), but I do not like idea to > have different algorithm how is read label in fatlabel and blkid. Both > tools are used by different GUI programs and it is a bad if one GUI > program on linux

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Monday 20 November 2017 12:12:56 Karel Zak wrote: > On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 01:44:40PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Thursday 09 November 2017 22:21:31 Pali Rohár wrote: > > > So from all tests and discussion I would propose new unification: > > > > > > 1. Read label only from the root

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Monday 20 November 2017 12:12:56 Karel Zak wrote: > On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 01:44:40PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Thursday 09 November 2017 22:21:31 Pali Rohár wrote: > > > So from all tests and discussion I would propose new unification: > > > > > > 1. Read label only from the root

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 01:44:40PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Thursday 09 November 2017 22:21:31 Pali Rohár wrote: > > So from all tests and discussion I would propose new unification: > > > > 1. Read label only from the root directory. If label in root directory > >is missing then disk

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 01:44:40PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Thursday 09 November 2017 22:21:31 Pali Rohár wrote: > > So from all tests and discussion I would propose new unification: > > > > 1. Read label only from the root directory. If label in root directory > >is missing then disk

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Thursday 09 November 2017 22:21:31 Pali Rohár wrote: > On Sunday 05 November 2017 14:06:08 Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Wednesday 11 October 2017 23:24:35 Pali Rohár wrote: > > > On Wednesday 04 October 2017 17:33:32 Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > Hi! There is a big inconsistency in Linux tools which

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Thursday 09 November 2017 22:21:31 Pali Rohár wrote: > On Sunday 05 November 2017 14:06:08 Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Wednesday 11 October 2017 23:24:35 Pali Rohár wrote: > > > On Wednesday 04 October 2017 17:33:32 Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > Hi! There is a big inconsistency in Linux tools which

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Sunday 05 November 2017 14:06:08 Pali Rohár wrote: > On Wednesday 11 October 2017 23:24:35 Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Wednesday 04 October 2017 17:33:32 Pali Rohár wrote: > > > Hi! There is a big inconsistency in Linux tools which read or write > > > FAT32 label in filesystem images. The most

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Sunday 05 November 2017 14:06:08 Pali Rohár wrote: > On Wednesday 11 October 2017 23:24:35 Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Wednesday 04 October 2017 17:33:32 Pali Rohár wrote: > > > Hi! There is a big inconsistency in Linux tools which read or write > > > FAT32 label in filesystem images. The most

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Thursday 09 November 2017 11:21:25 Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 10:01:45AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > You would have stored LABEL42 in boot sector and no label in root > > > > directory. Windows handle this situation as there is no label. > > > > > > But why should we

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Thursday 09 November 2017 11:21:25 Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 10:01:45AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > You would have stored LABEL42 in boot sector and no label in root > > > > directory. Windows handle this situation as there is no label. > > > > > > But why should we

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 10:01:45AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > You would have stored LABEL42 in boot sector and no label in root > > > directory. Windows handle this situation as there is no label. > > > > But why should we *care*? > > FAT is Microsoft's filesystem and the only usage of it on

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 10:01:45AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > You would have stored LABEL42 in boot sector and no label in root > > > directory. Windows handle this situation as there is no label. > > > > But why should we *care*? > > FAT is Microsoft's filesystem and the only usage of it on

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 09:59:09AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > What about exporting e.g. BOOT_LABEL field from libblkid for vfat disks? > LABEL (which is shown to user, e.g. in GUI) would be that one from root > directory (same which is used by label on MS-DOS and Windows) and > BOOT_LABEL would be

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 09:59:09AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > What about exporting e.g. BOOT_LABEL field from libblkid for vfat disks? > LABEL (which is shown to user, e.g. in GUI) would be that one from root > directory (same which is used by label on MS-DOS and Windows) and > BOOT_LABEL would be

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Tuesday 07 November 2017 12:28:41 Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Sun, Nov 05, 2017 at 10:12:49PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > > Easy way how to achieve this situation: > > > > 1. use mkdosfs to format hard disk to FAT32 with label LABEL42 > > > > 2. boot Windows 10 (or XP) and set label of that

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Tuesday 07 November 2017 12:28:41 Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Sun, Nov 05, 2017 at 10:12:49PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > > Easy way how to achieve this situation: > > > > 1. use mkdosfs to format hard disk to FAT32 with label LABEL42 > > > > 2. boot Windows 10 (or XP) and set label of that

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Monday 06 November 2017 11:14:44 Karel Zak wrote: > On Sun, Nov 05, 2017 at 03:34:11PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Sunday 05 November 2017 16:25:54 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > On Sunday 05 November 2017

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Monday 06 November 2017 11:14:44 Karel Zak wrote: > On Sun, Nov 05, 2017 at 03:34:11PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Sunday 05 November 2017 16:25:54 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > On Sunday 05 November 2017 15:56:53 Andy Shevchenko

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Sun, Nov 05, 2017 at 10:12:49PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > Easy way how to achieve this situation: > > 1. use mkdosfs to format hard disk to FAT32 with label LABEL42 > > 2. boot Windows 10 (or XP) and set label of that FAT32 partition to > empty (via Explorer GUI) > > 3. profit > > You

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Sun, Nov 05, 2017 at 10:12:49PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > Easy way how to achieve this situation: > > 1. use mkdosfs to format hard disk to FAT32 with label LABEL42 > > 2. boot Windows 10 (or XP) and set label of that FAT32 partition to > empty (via Explorer GUI) > > 3. profit > > You

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Sun, Nov 05, 2017 at 03:34:11PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Sunday 05 November 2017 16:25:54 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > On Sunday 05 November 2017 15:56:53 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > >> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 3:39

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Sun, Nov 05, 2017 at 03:34:11PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Sunday 05 November 2017 16:25:54 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > On Sunday 05 November 2017 15:56:53 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > >> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Sunday 05 November 2017 15:35:42 Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Sun, Nov 05, 2017 at 03:07:45PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > Current behavior of the last blkid and fatlabel tools is: Try to read > > label from the root directory. If it does not exist, then fallback to > > label stored in boot

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Sunday 05 November 2017 15:35:42 Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Sun, Nov 05, 2017 at 03:07:45PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > Current behavior of the last blkid and fatlabel tools is: Try to read > > label from the root directory. If it does not exist, then fallback to > > label stored in boot

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Sun, Nov 05, 2017 at 03:07:45PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > > Current behavior of the last blkid and fatlabel tools is: Try to read > label from the root directory. If it does not exist, then fallback to > label stored in boot sector. And when fatlabel is changing label it > updates both

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Sun, Nov 05, 2017 at 03:07:45PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > > Current behavior of the last blkid and fatlabel tools is: Try to read > label from the root directory. If it does not exist, then fallback to > label stored in boot sector. And when fatlabel is changing label it > updates both

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Sunday 05 November 2017 16:51:49 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > In comparison lsblk might output partition label and FS label. > > Looking to blkid help > >-L, --label label > Look up the device that uses this filesystem label; > this is equal to --list-one --output device >

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Sunday 05 November 2017 16:51:49 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > In comparison lsblk might output partition label and FS label. > > Looking to blkid help > >-L, --label label > Look up the device that uses this filesystem label; > this is equal to --list-one --output device >

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Sunday 05 November 2017 16:25:54 Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Pali Rohár wrote: >> > On Sunday 05 November 2017 15:56:53 Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> >> On Sun, Nov 5,

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Sunday 05 November 2017 16:25:54 Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Pali Rohár wrote: >> > On Sunday 05 November 2017 15:56:53 Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> >> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Pali Rohár wrote: >> >> > On

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Sunday 05 November 2017 16:25:54 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Sunday 05 November 2017 15:56:53 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Pali Rohár wrote: > >> > On Tuesday 31

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Sunday 05 November 2017 16:25:54 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Sunday 05 November 2017 15:56:53 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Pali Rohár wrote: > >> > On Tuesday 31 October 2017 10:35:48 Andy Shevchenko wrote: >

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Sunday 05 November 2017 15:56:53 Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Pali Rohár wrote: >> > On Tuesday 31 October 2017 10:35:48 Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> >> On Mon, Oct 16,

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Sunday 05 November 2017 15:56:53 Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Pali Rohár wrote: >> > On Tuesday 31 October 2017 10:35:48 Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> >> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 4:12 AM, Andreas Bombe wrote: >> >> >

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

Hi, Well, KDE Partition Manager uses dosfstools but I can always release a new version once updated dosfstools is released. Best, Andrius 2017 m. lapkričio 5 d., sekmadienis 13:56:53 GMT Andy Shevchenko rašė: > On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

Hi, Well, KDE Partition Manager uses dosfstools but I can always release a new version once updated dosfstools is released. Best, Andrius 2017 m. lapkričio 5 d., sekmadienis 13:56:53 GMT Andy Shevchenko rašė: > On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Tuesday 31 October 2017

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Sunday 05 November 2017 15:56:53 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Tuesday 31 October 2017 10:35:48 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 4:12 AM, Andreas Bombe wrote: > >> > On Thu, Oct 12,

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Sunday 05 November 2017 15:56:53 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Tuesday 31 October 2017 10:35:48 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 4:12 AM, Andreas Bombe wrote: > >> > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 10:49:31PM +0200, Pali Rohár

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Tuesday 31 October 2017 10:35:48 Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 4:12 AM, Andreas Bombe wrote: >> > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 10:49:31PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: >> >> On Thursday 12

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Tuesday 31 October 2017 10:35:48 Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 4:12 AM, Andreas Bombe wrote: >> > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 10:49:31PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: >> >> On Thursday 12 October 2017 12:13:11 Karel Zak wrote: >>

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Tuesday 31 October 2017 10:35:48 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 4:12 AM, Andreas Bombe wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 10:49:31PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > >> On Thursday 12 October 2017 12:13:11 Karel Zak wrote: > >> > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:21:13AM

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Tuesday 31 October 2017 10:35:48 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 4:12 AM, Andreas Bombe wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 10:49:31PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > >> On Thursday 12 October 2017 12:13:11 Karel Zak wrote: > >> > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:21:13AM +0200, Pali Rohár

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Wednesday 11 October 2017 23:24:35 Pali Rohár wrote: > On Wednesday 04 October 2017 17:33:32 Pali Rohár wrote: > > Hi! There is a big inconsistency in Linux tools which read or write > > FAT32 label in filesystem images. The most common used are tools: > > blkid (from util-linux project),

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Wednesday 11 October 2017 23:24:35 Pali Rohár wrote: > On Wednesday 04 October 2017 17:33:32 Pali Rohár wrote: > > Hi! There is a big inconsistency in Linux tools which read or write > > FAT32 label in filesystem images. The most common used are tools: > > blkid (from util-linux project),

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 4:12 AM, Andreas Bombe wrote: > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 10:49:31PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: >> On Thursday 12 October 2017 12:13:11 Karel Zak wrote: >> > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:21:13AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: >> > > > The best for me is to keep blkid

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 4:12 AM, Andreas Bombe wrote: > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 10:49:31PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: >> On Thursday 12 October 2017 12:13:11 Karel Zak wrote: >> > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:21:13AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: >> > > > The best for me is to keep blkid output backwardly

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Monday 16 October 2017 09:28:45 Pali Rohár wrote: > On Monday 16 October 2017 03:12:43 Andreas Bombe wrote: > > The other thing is completely ignoring the boot sector label, which I > > could have as a mode enabled by command line switch or environmental > > variable, or just outright make it

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Monday 16 October 2017 09:28:45 Pali Rohár wrote: > On Monday 16 October 2017 03:12:43 Andreas Bombe wrote: > > The other thing is completely ignoring the boot sector label, which I > > could have as a mode enabled by command line switch or environmental > > variable, or just outright make it

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Monday 16 October 2017 03:12:43 Andreas Bombe wrote: > The other thing is completely ignoring the boot sector label, which I > could have as a mode enabled by command line switch or environmental > variable, or just outright make it the default. I'm not decided yet. > > Another problem is

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Monday 16 October 2017 03:12:43 Andreas Bombe wrote: > The other thing is completely ignoring the boot sector label, which I > could have as a mode enabled by command line switch or environmental > variable, or just outright make it the default. I'm not decided yet. > > Another problem is

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 10:49:31PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Thursday 12 October 2017 12:13:11 Karel Zak wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:21:13AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > The best for me is to keep blkid output backwardly compatible as much > > > > as possible :-) > > > > > >

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 10:49:31PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Thursday 12 October 2017 12:13:11 Karel Zak wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:21:13AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > The best for me is to keep blkid output backwardly compatible as much > > > > as possible :-) > > > > > >

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 12:04:50AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Sunday 15 October 2017 08:59:01 Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi! > > > > > Based on results I would propose following unification: > > > > > ... > > > 4. Prefer label from the root directory. If there is none entry (means > > >there

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 12:04:50AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Sunday 15 October 2017 08:59:01 Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi! > > > > > Based on results I would propose following unification: > > > > > ... > > > 4. Prefer label from the root directory. If there is none entry (means > > >there

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Sunday 15 October 2017 08:59:01 Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > Based on results I would propose following unification: > > > ... > > 4. Prefer label from the root directory. If there is none entry (means > >there is also no erased entry), then read label from root sector. > > > >-->

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Sunday 15 October 2017 08:59:01 Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > Based on results I would propose following unification: > > > ... > > 4. Prefer label from the root directory. If there is none entry (means > >there is also no erased entry), then read label from root sector. > > > >-->

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

Hi! > Based on results I would propose following unification: > ... > 4. Prefer label from the root directory. If there is none entry (means >there is also no erased entry), then read label from root sector. > >--> Reason: Windows XP and mlabel ignores what is written in boot >

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

Hi! > Based on results I would propose following unification: > ... > 4. Prefer label from the root directory. If there is none entry (means >there is also no erased entry), then read label from root sector. > >--> Reason: Windows XP and mlabel ignores what is written in boot >

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Thursday 12 October 2017 12:13:11 Karel Zak wrote: > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:21:13AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > The best for me is to keep blkid output backwardly compatible as much > > > as possible :-) > > > > Backward compatibility is a good reason. But what with situation when > >

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Thursday 12 October 2017 12:13:11 Karel Zak wrote: > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:21:13AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > The best for me is to keep blkid output backwardly compatible as much > > > as possible :-) > > > > Backward compatibility is a good reason. But what with situation when > >

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:21:13AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > > The best for me is to keep blkid output backwardly compatible as much > > as possible :-) > > Backward compatibility is a good reason. But what with situation when > interoperability with other systems (e.g. Windows) does not work as

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:21:13AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > > The best for me is to keep blkid output backwardly compatible as much > > as possible :-) > > Backward compatibility is a good reason. But what with situation when > interoperability with other systems (e.g. Windows) does not work as

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Thursday 12 October 2017 10:56:58 Karel Zak wrote: > On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 11:44:26PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Wednesday 11 October 2017 23:24:35 Pali Rohár wrote: > > > On Wednesday 04 October 2017 17:33:32 Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > Hi! There is a big inconsistency in Linux tools

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Thursday 12 October 2017 10:56:58 Karel Zak wrote: > On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 11:44:26PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Wednesday 11 October 2017 23:24:35 Pali Rohár wrote: > > > On Wednesday 04 October 2017 17:33:32 Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > Hi! There is a big inconsistency in Linux tools

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 11:44:26PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Wednesday 11 October 2017 23:24:35 Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Wednesday 04 October 2017 17:33:32 Pali Rohár wrote: > > > Hi! There is a big inconsistency in Linux tools which read or write > > > FAT32 label in filesystem images. The

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 11:44:26PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Wednesday 11 October 2017 23:24:35 Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Wednesday 04 October 2017 17:33:32 Pali Rohár wrote: > > > Hi! There is a big inconsistency in Linux tools which read or write > > > FAT32 label in filesystem images. The

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Wednesday 11 October 2017 23:24:35 Pali Rohár wrote: > On Wednesday 04 October 2017 17:33:32 Pali Rohár wrote: > > Hi! There is a big inconsistency in Linux tools which read or write > > FAT32 label in filesystem images. The most common used are tools: > > blkid (from util-linux project),

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Wednesday 11 October 2017 23:24:35 Pali Rohár wrote: > On Wednesday 04 October 2017 17:33:32 Pali Rohár wrote: > > Hi! There is a big inconsistency in Linux tools which read or write > > FAT32 label in filesystem images. The most common used are tools: > > blkid (from util-linux project),

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Wednesday 11 October 2017 23:24:35 Pali Rohár wrote: > Attached images in compressed form has only 600 kB and I think they can > be useful for testing either blkid or dosfstools project, so I'm sending > them here. Gmail refused to send .tar.gz archive. So I'm sending tar.bz2. It is just 9 kB

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Wednesday 11 October 2017 23:24:35 Pali Rohár wrote: > Attached images in compressed form has only 600 kB and I think they can > be useful for testing either blkid or dosfstools project, so I'm sending > them here. Gmail refused to send .tar.gz archive. So I'm sending tar.bz2. It is just 9 kB

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Wednesday 04 October 2017 17:33:32 Pali Rohár wrote: > Hi! There is a big inconsistency in Linux tools which read or write > FAT32 label in filesystem images. The most common used are tools: > blkid (from util-linux project), fatlabel (previously known as > dosfslabel; from dosfstools project)

Re: Linux & FAT32 label

On Wednesday 04 October 2017 17:33:32 Pali Rohár wrote: > Hi! There is a big inconsistency in Linux tools which read or write > FAT32 label in filesystem images. The most common used are tools: > blkid (from util-linux project), fatlabel (previously known as > dosfslabel; from dosfstools project)