Re: Re[v2]: Use of GCC plugin instead ISO C

2018-03-07 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 03/06/2018 10:01 PM, Progyan Bhattacharya wrote: > On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 09:24 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> First, please make sure that this file does not already exist before >> starting >> a build:  /home/progyan/Programs/Linux/tools/objtool/.objtool- >> in.o.cmd > > Yes, it was there and I

Re: Re[v2]: Use of GCC plugin instead ISO C

2018-03-06 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 03/06/2018 05:28 AM, Progyan Bhattacharya wrote: > On Thu, 2018-03-01 at 13:42 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> If you would build with V=1 and capture all of the output (lots of >> it!) to a file, >> you could search it for "pedantic" to see where/why it is used. >> >> I have no idea about the per

Re: Re[v2]: Use of GCC plugin instead ISO C

2018-03-06 Thread Progyan Bhattacharya
On Thu, 2018-03-01 at 13:42 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > If you would build with V=1 and capture all of the output (lots of > it!) to a file, > you could search it for "pedantic" to see where/why it is used. > > I have no idea about the permission problem that you quoted above. Sorry for the misu

Re: Re[v2]: Use of GCC plugin instead ISO C

2018-03-01 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 02/28/2018 11:50 PM, Progyan Bhattacharya wrote: > On Thu, 2018-02-22 at 20:07 +0530, Progyan Bhattacharya wrote: >> On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 08:47 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: >>> You could try (re)building with V=1 on the "make" command line and >>> capture >>> the output to see where the "pedantic