On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Malcolm Beattie wrote:
> Without the raised tcp_wmem setting I was getting 81 MByte/s. With
> tcp_wmem set as above I got 86 MByte/s. Nice increase. Any other
> setting I can tweak apart from {r,w}mem_max and tcp_{w,r}mem? The CPU
> on the client (350 MHz PII) is the
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Malcolm Beattie wrote:
Without the raised tcp_wmem setting I was getting 81 MByte/s. With
tcp_wmem set as above I got 86 MByte/s. Nice increase. Any other
setting I can tweak apart from {r,w}mem_max and tcp_{w,r}mem? The CPU
on the client (350 MHz PII) is the
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, jamal wrote:
>
> > > - is this UDP or TCP based? (UDP i guess)
> > >
> > TCP
>
> well then i'd suggest to do:
>
> echo 10 10 10 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_wmem
>
> does this make any difference?
According to my
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, jamal wrote:
> > - is this UDP or TCP based? (UDP i guess)
> >
> TCP
well then i'd suggest to do:
echo 10 10 10 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_wmem
does this make any difference?
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, jamal wrote:
>
> > Kernel | tput | sender-CPU | receiver-CPU |
> > -
> > 2.4.0-pre3 | 99MB/s | 87% | 23% |
> > NSF|||
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, jamal wrote:
> Kernel | tput | sender-CPU | receiver-CPU |
> -
> 2.4.0-pre3 | 99MB/s | 87% | 23% |
> NSF||| |
> -
>
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, jamal wrote:
Kernel | tput | sender-CPU | receiver-CPU |
-
2.4.0-pre3 | 99MB/s | 87% | 23% |
NSF||| |
-
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Ingo Molnar wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, jamal wrote:
Kernel | tput | sender-CPU | receiver-CPU |
-
2.4.0-pre3 | 99MB/s | 87% | 23% |
NSF||| |
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, jamal wrote:
- is this UDP or TCP based? (UDP i guess)
TCP
well then i'd suggest to do:
echo 10 10 10 /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_wmem
does this make any difference?
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
9 matches
Mail list logo
