On Mon, Feb 11 2008 at 12:02 +0200, Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 11:47:57AM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 11 2008 at 0:44 +0200, James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Andrew this patch was in -mm for two month or so. I was under the
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 11:47:57AM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11 2008 at 0:44 +0200, James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew this patch was in -mm for two month or so. I was under the impression
> that you have an arm cross compiler that tries to build every -mm kernel.
>
On Mon, Feb 11 2008 at 0:44 +0200, James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 22:02 +, Russell King wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 08:20:24AM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 13:58 +, Russell King wrote:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at
On Mon, Feb 11 2008 at 12:02 +0200, Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 11:47:57AM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11 2008 at 0:44 +0200, James Bottomley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew this patch was in -mm for two month or so. I was under the impression
that
On Mon, Feb 11 2008 at 0:44 +0200, James Bottomley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 22:02 +, Russell King wrote:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 08:20:24AM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 13:58 +, Russell King wrote:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 03:07:09PM +0200,
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 11:47:57AM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11 2008 at 0:44 +0200, James Bottomley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew this patch was in -mm for two month or so. I was under the impression
that you have an arm cross compiler that tries to build every -mm kernel.
Is it
On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 22:02 +, Russell King wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 08:20:24AM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 13:58 +, Russell King wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 03:07:09PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> > > > It's in mainline
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 08:20:24AM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 13:58 +, Russell King wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 03:07:09PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> > > It's in mainline 84ac86ca8c6787f9efff28bc04b1b65fe0a5c310
> > > [SCSI] arm: convert to accessors
On Sun, Feb 10 2008 at 16:20 +0200, James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 13:58 +, Russell King wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 03:07:09PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>>> It's in mainline 84ac86ca8c6787f9efff28bc04b1b65fe0a5c310
>>> [SCSI] arm: convert to
On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 13:58 +, Russell King wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 03:07:09PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> > It's in mainline 84ac86ca8c6787f9efff28bc04b1b65fe0a5c310
> > [SCSI] arm: convert to accessors and !use_sg cleanup
> >
> > Thanks for checking. This patch was in
On Sun, Feb 10 2008 at 15:58 +0200, Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 03:07:09PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> It's in mainline 84ac86ca8c6787f9efff28bc04b1b65fe0a5c310
>> [SCSI] arm: convert to accessors and !use_sg cleanup
>>
>> Thanks for checking. This patch
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 03:07:09PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> It's in mainline 84ac86ca8c6787f9efff28bc04b1b65fe0a5c310
> [SCSI] arm: convert to accessors and !use_sg cleanup
>
> Thanks for checking. This patch was in scsi-pending tree since forever, And
> we were unable
> to get a
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 03:07:09PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 09 2008 at 2:04 +0200, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Commit 30b0c37b27485a9cb897bfe3824f6f517b8c80d6 causes the following
> > compile error:
> >
> > <-- snip -->
> >
> > ...
> > CC
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 03:07:09PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 09 2008 at 2:04 +0200, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Commit 30b0c37b27485a9cb897bfe3824f6f517b8c80d6 causes the following
> > compile error:
> >
> > <-- snip -->
> >
> > ...
> > CC
On Sat, Feb 09 2008 at 2:04 +0200, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Commit 30b0c37b27485a9cb897bfe3824f6f517b8c80d6 causes the following
> compile error:
>
> <-- snip -->
>
> ...
> CC drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.o
>
On Sat, Feb 09 2008 at 2:04 +0200, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Commit 30b0c37b27485a9cb897bfe3824f6f517b8c80d6 causes the following
compile error:
-- snip --
...
CC drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.o
/home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c: In
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 03:07:09PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
On Sat, Feb 09 2008 at 2:04 +0200, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Commit 30b0c37b27485a9cb897bfe3824f6f517b8c80d6 causes the following
compile error:
-- snip --
...
CC drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.o
On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 13:58 +, Russell King wrote:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 03:07:09PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
It's in mainline 84ac86ca8c6787f9efff28bc04b1b65fe0a5c310
[SCSI] arm: convert to accessors and !use_sg cleanup
Thanks for checking. This patch was in scsi-pending tree
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 03:07:09PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
It's in mainline 84ac86ca8c6787f9efff28bc04b1b65fe0a5c310
[SCSI] arm: convert to accessors and !use_sg cleanup
Thanks for checking. This patch was in scsi-pending tree since forever, And
we were unable
to get a responsive
On Sun, Feb 10 2008 at 15:58 +0200, Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 03:07:09PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
It's in mainline 84ac86ca8c6787f9efff28bc04b1b65fe0a5c310
[SCSI] arm: convert to accessors and !use_sg cleanup
Thanks for checking. This patch was in
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 08:20:24AM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 13:58 +, Russell King wrote:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 03:07:09PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
It's in mainline 84ac86ca8c6787f9efff28bc04b1b65fe0a5c310
[SCSI] arm: convert to accessors and !use_sg
On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 22:02 +, Russell King wrote:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 08:20:24AM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 13:58 +, Russell King wrote:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 03:07:09PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
It's in mainline
22 matches
Mail list logo