Hello,
On 11/18/2015 05:07 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Brian and Mark,
>
> On 11/16/2015 06:32 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> On 11/16/2015 05:47 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:00:43PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
On 11/16/2015 04:24
Hello,
On 11/18/2015 05:07 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Brian and Mark,
>
> On 11/16/2015 06:32 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> On 11/16/2015 05:47 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:00:43PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
On 11/16/2015 04:24
Hello Brian and Mark,
On 11/16/2015 06:32 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On 11/16/2015 05:47 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:00:43PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>> On 11/16/2015 04:24 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
[snip]
I don't think you have problems
Hello Brian and Mark,
On 11/16/2015 06:32 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On 11/16/2015 05:47 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:00:43PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>> On 11/16/2015 04:24 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
[snip]
I don't think you have problems
Hello Mark,
On 11/17/2015 10:34 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:00:43PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>
>> Now that I think about it, there is another issue and is that today spi:foo
>> defines a namespace while changing to of: will make the namespace flat so
>> a
Hello Mark,
On 11/17/2015 10:19 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 10:14:27AM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> On 11/16/2015 06:51 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
>
>>> Lest someone else wonder whether this is theoretical or not, I'll save
>>> them the work in pointing at an
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:00:43PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Now that I think about it, there is another issue and is that today spi:foo
> defines a namespace while changing to of: will make the namespace flat so
> a platform driver that has the same vendor and model will have the
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 10:14:27AM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On 11/16/2015 06:51 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
> > Lest someone else wonder whether this is theoretical or not, I'll save
> > them the work in pointing at an example: "st,st33zp24". See:
> >
Hello Brian,
On 11/16/2015 06:51 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 06:32:22PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
[snip]
>>
>> Let's suppose you have 3 different IP's blocks (i.e: pmics) from the same
>> vendor. The IP's are quite similar but only differ in that use a
Hello Mark,
On 11/17/2015 10:19 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 10:14:27AM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> On 11/16/2015 06:51 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
>
>>> Lest someone else wonder whether this is theoretical or not, I'll save
>>> them the work in pointing at an
Hello Mark,
On 11/17/2015 10:34 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:00:43PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>
>> Now that I think about it, there is another issue and is that today spi:foo
>> defines a namespace while changing to of: will make the namespace flat so
>> a
Hello Brian,
On 11/16/2015 06:51 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 06:32:22PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
[snip]
>>
>> Let's suppose you have 3 different IP's blocks (i.e: pmics) from the same
>> vendor. The IP's are quite similar but only differ in that use a
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 10:14:27AM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On 11/16/2015 06:51 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
> > Lest someone else wonder whether this is theoretical or not, I'll save
> > them the work in pointing at an example: "st,st33zp24". See:
> >
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:00:43PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Now that I think about it, there is another issue and is that today spi:foo
> defines a namespace while changing to of: will make the namespace flat so
> a platform driver that has the same vendor and model will have the
Hi Javier,
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 06:32:22PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On 11/16/2015 05:47 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:00:43PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> >> Now that I think about it, there is another issue and is that today spi:foo
> >>
Hello Brian,
On 11/16/2015 05:47 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:00:43PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> On 11/16/2015 04:24 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
>
>> I also didn't think about wilcards... I wonder why there are trailing
>> wildcards for a compatible
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:00:43PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On 11/16/2015 04:24 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
> I also didn't think about wilcards... I wonder why there are trailing
> wildcards for a compatible string. After all a compatible string should
> define a particular IP
Hello Brian,
On 11/16/2015 04:24 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
> Hi Javier,
>
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 02:19:27PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> On 11/13/2015 08:48 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:14:10PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at
Hi Javier,
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 02:19:27PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On 11/13/2015 08:48 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:14:10PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> >> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 02:51:13PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
>
Hello Mark,
On 11/16/2015 02:51 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 02:26:49PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> On 11/16/2015 10:53 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>>> What I don't really understand here is why we've decided to push all
>>> this stuff into the subsystems, it seems
Hello Mark,
On 11/16/2015 02:49 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 02:19:27PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> On 11/13/2015 08:48 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
>
>>> (I believe I avoided this in the first place for mostly-aesthetic
>>> reasons; technically this allows people to
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 02:26:49PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On 11/16/2015 10:53 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > What I don't really understand here is why we've decided to push all
> > this stuff into the subsystems, it seems like if we're managing to do
> > the matching based on the
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 02:19:27PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On 11/13/2015 08:48 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
> > (I believe I avoided this in the first place for mostly-aesthetic
> > reasons; technically this allows people to put garbage in their DT, like
> > "garbage,spi-nor". It's
Hello Mark,
On 11/16/2015 10:53 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 03:48:57PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
>
>> I suspect we'll have to fully support both spi_device_id tables (fully
>> supported already; if nothing else, to keep wildcard matching) and
>> of_match_tables (not fully
Hello Brian and Mark,
Sorry for the delay, I was quite busy at the end of last week and didn't
have time to look at my email closely.
On 11/13/2015 08:48 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:14:10PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 02:51:13PM -0800,
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 03:48:57PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> I suspect we'll have to fully support both spi_device_id tables (fully
> supported already; if nothing else, to keep wildcard matching) and
> of_match_tables (not fully supported for module loading), and in some
> cases, the two will
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 03:48:57PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> I suspect we'll have to fully support both spi_device_id tables (fully
> supported already; if nothing else, to keep wildcard matching) and
> of_match_tables (not fully supported for module loading), and in some
> cases, the two will
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 02:19:27PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On 11/13/2015 08:48 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
> > (I believe I avoided this in the first place for mostly-aesthetic
> > reasons; technically this allows people to put garbage in their DT, like
> > "garbage,spi-nor". It's
Hello Mark,
On 11/16/2015 02:49 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 02:19:27PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> On 11/13/2015 08:48 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
>
>>> (I believe I avoided this in the first place for mostly-aesthetic
>>> reasons; technically this allows people to
Hello Mark,
On 11/16/2015 10:53 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 03:48:57PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
>
>> I suspect we'll have to fully support both spi_device_id tables (fully
>> supported already; if nothing else, to keep wildcard matching) and
>> of_match_tables (not fully
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 02:26:49PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On 11/16/2015 10:53 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > What I don't really understand here is why we've decided to push all
> > this stuff into the subsystems, it seems like if we're managing to do
> > the matching based on the
Hello Mark,
On 11/16/2015 02:51 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 02:26:49PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> On 11/16/2015 10:53 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>>> What I don't really understand here is why we've decided to push all
>>> this stuff into the subsystems, it seems
Hello Brian and Mark,
Sorry for the delay, I was quite busy at the end of last week and didn't
have time to look at my email closely.
On 11/13/2015 08:48 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:14:10PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 02:51:13PM -0800,
Hello Brian,
On 11/16/2015 05:47 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:00:43PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> On 11/16/2015 04:24 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
>
>> I also didn't think about wilcards... I wonder why there are trailing
>> wildcards for a compatible
Hi Javier,
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 06:32:22PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On 11/16/2015 05:47 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:00:43PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> >> Now that I think about it, there is another issue and is that today spi:foo
> >>
Hi Javier,
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 02:19:27PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On 11/13/2015 08:48 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:14:10PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> >> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 02:51:13PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
>
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:00:43PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On 11/16/2015 04:24 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
> I also didn't think about wilcards... I wonder why there are trailing
> wildcards for a compatible string. After all a compatible string should
> define a particular IP
Hello Brian,
On 11/16/2015 04:24 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
> Hi Javier,
>
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 02:19:27PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> On 11/13/2015 08:48 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:14:10PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:14:10PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 02:51:13PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
>
> > General problem:
> >
>
> > The SPI core doesn't use the OF compatible property for generating
> > uevent/modalias, and therefore can't autoload
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 02:51:13PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:12:28PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:40:31AM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> > > (Changing subject line, because apparently some people ignore mail if it
> > > doesn't have 'SPI' in
Hi Mark,
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:12:28PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:40:31AM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
>
> > (Changing subject line, because apparently some people ignore mail if it
> > doesn't have 'SPI' in the subject line)
>
> Well, if you mean me I'm getting
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:40:31AM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> (Changing subject line, because apparently some people ignore mail if it
> doesn't have 'SPI' in the subject line)
Well, if you mean me I'm getting CCed on such a large number of large
threads about MTD patches that only have
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:40:31AM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> (Changing subject line, because apparently some people ignore mail if it
> doesn't have 'SPI' in the subject line)
Well, if you mean me I'm getting CCed on such a large number of large
threads about MTD patches that only have
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 02:51:13PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:12:28PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:40:31AM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> > > (Changing subject line, because apparently some people ignore mail if it
> > > doesn't have 'SPI' in
Hi Mark,
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:12:28PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:40:31AM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
>
> > (Changing subject line, because apparently some people ignore mail if it
> > doesn't have 'SPI' in the subject line)
>
> Well, if you mean me I'm getting
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:14:10PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 02:51:13PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
>
> > General problem:
> >
>
> > The SPI core doesn't use the OF compatible property for generating
> > uevent/modalias, and therefore can't autoload
46 matches
Mail list logo
