my subject

I am Peter Wong director of operations, Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Hong Kong. I have a very confidential business proposition involving transfer of $18.350.000.00 that will be of great benefit for both of us. Reply for more details as regards this transaction Best Regards

[no subject]

Brauchen Sie einen Kredit? Wenn ja, mailen Sie uns jetzt für weitere Informationen Do you need a loan of any kind? If Yes email us now for more info

[no subject]

Brauchen Sie einen Kredit? Wenn ja, mailen Sie uns jetzt für weitere Informationen Do you need a loan of any kind? If Yes email us now for more info

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

Michael. Michael Schmitz - 01.07.18, 04:43: > Am 30.06.18 um 19:49 schrieb Martin Steigerwald: > > I am really inclined to point some AmigaOS 4 developers to this > > discussion and just looked for an archive. Unfortunately there does > > not appear to be a working one. The one mentioned on > >

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

FWIW on the other side this appears to be a good source of Amiga software data. http://amigadev.elowar.com/ {^_^} On 20180630 19:43, Michael Schmitz wrote: Martin, Am 30.06.18 um 19:49 schrieb Martin Steigerwald: I am really inclined to point some AmigaOS 4 developers to this discussion and

Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

Martin, Am 30.06.18 um 19:49 schrieb Martin Steigerwald: > I am really inclined to point some AmigaOS 4 developers to this > discussion and just looked for an archive. Unfortunately there does not > appear to be a working one. The one mentioned on > > http://www.linux-m68k.org/mail.html > >

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

Hi Geert, Am 01.07.2018 um 09:10 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven: Hi Michael, On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 11:12 AM Michael Schmitz wrote: Am 28.06.18 um 01:30 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven: On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 4:47 AM wrote: From 5299e0e64dfb33ac3a1f3137b42178734ce20087 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

Hi Andreas, On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 3:26 PM Andreas Schwab wrote: > On Jun 29 2018, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > Would MSDOS recognize the GPT partition as 'probably FAT', and attempt > > to use it? > > GPT has the concept of a protective MBR which should prevent such errors. Thanks, good to

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

Hi Michael, On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 11:12 AM Michael Schmitz wrote: > Am 28.06.18 um 01:30 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven: > > On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 4:47 AM wrote: > >> From 5299e0e64dfb33ac3a1f3137b42178734ce20087 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > ?? > > > >> The Amiga RDB partition parser module

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

As software is discovered to be "broken" at it to the appropriate incompatible list. Otherwise permanently limit AmigaDOS to 2TB. {^_^} On 20180630 02:07, Martin Steigerwald wrote: jdow - 30.06.18, 08:47: Let's get everybody: On 20180629 22:26, Michael Schmitz wrote: > Joanne, > > Am

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

Get everybody On 20180630 00:49, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Whoa, my summary essay triggered digging even more accurately into that > matter. For some obscure reason I am even enjoying this. :) > > jdow - 30.06.18, 05:56: >> On 20180629 18:31, Michael Schmitz wrote:> Joanne, >> >> > Am

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

For Linux: 1) Make a change to the Linux RDB parser so that the product of the "CHS" values goes to at least a 64 bit entity, It may need to go to a 128 bit entity when we are encoding data in DNA, crystal lattices, or something else super dense. The parser simply feeds data to the OS. No

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

jdow - 30.06.18, 08:47: > Let's get everybody: > > On 20180629 22:26, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > Joanne, > > > > Am 30.06.18 um 15:56 schrieb jdow: > > As far as I can guess from the code, pb_Environment[3] (number > > of > > heads) > > > and

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

Michael. Joanne. I do think this discussion is slightly getting out of hand… so I suggest to focus on what its up to the kernel to do and what is not. And to focus only on what is up to the RDB parser, cause the patch is on changing that. The RDB parser is not responsible for what any file

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

Whoa, my summary essay triggered digging even more accurately into that matter. For some obscure reason I am even enjoying this. :) jdow - 30.06.18, 05:56: > On 20180629 18:31, Michael Schmitz wrote:> Joanne, > > > Am 30.06.18 um 12:57 schrieb jdow: > >> On 20180629 17:44, Michael Schmitz

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

Let's get everybody: On 20180629 22:26, Michael Schmitz wrote: > Joanne, > > > Am 30.06.18 um 15:56 schrieb jdow: >> > As far as I can guess from the code, pb_Environment[3] (number of heads) > and pb_Environment[5] (number of sectors per cylinder) are abitrarily > chosen so the

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

Joanne, Am 30.06.18 um 15:56 schrieb jdow: > > >>> As far as I can guess from the code, pb_Environment[3] (number of > >> heads) > >>> and pb_Environment[5] (number of sectors per cylinder) are abitrarily > >>> chosen so the partition size can be expressed as a difference between > >>>

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

On 20180629 18:31, Michael Schmitz wrote:> Joanne, > > > Am 30.06.18 um 12:57 schrieb jdow: >> On 20180629 17:44, Michael Schmitz wrote: >> >>> struct PartitionBlock { >>>__be32 pb_ID; >>>__be32 pb_SummedLongs; >>>__s32 pb_ChkSum; >>>__u32

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

Joanne, Am 30.06.18 um 12:57 schrieb jdow: > On 20180629 17:44, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > struct PartitionBlock { > >  __be32  pb_ID; > >  __be32  pb_SummedLongs; > >  __s32   pb_ChkSum; > >  __u32   pb_HostID; > >  __be32  pb_Next; > >  __u32  

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

On 20180629 17:44, Michael Schmitz wrote: > struct PartitionBlock { > __be32 pb_ID; > __be32 pb_SummedLongs; > __s32 pb_ChkSum; > __u32 pb_HostID; > __be32 pb_Next; > __u32 pb_Flags; > __u32 pb_Reserved1[2]; >

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

On 20180629 16:24, Michael Schmitz wrote: > Martin, > > ... > The problem that still remains is with unpatched legacy versions. RDB > does support large enough partitions out of the box, due to C/H/S all > using u32. We all agree there. The question is with file systems and Nope, I bothered to

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

Joanne, Am 30.06.18 um 11:24 schrieb jdow: > > On 20180629 14:45, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > Beware: Essay ahead which proofs it to the point that there is no > > overflow in RDB before 96 bits maximum value of sectors: > > Time to go into more detail on RDBs. It isn't as simple as it started

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

Martin, Am 30.06.18 um 09:24 schrieb Martin Steigerwald: > Hi Michael. > > Michael Schmitz - 29.06.18, 11:07: >>> But it's up to the person (which is not Linux) formatting the disk >>> to >>> not try to use >>> it on systems that cannot handle it, and may destroy it. >>> > Let me clarify:

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

On 20180629 14:45, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Beware: Essay ahead which proofs it to the point that there is no > overflow in RDB before 96 bits maximum value of sectors: Time to go into more detail on RDBs. It isn't as simple as it started to appear. extract from hardblocks.h RDSK block

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

Beware: Essay ahead which proofs it to the point that there is no overflow in RDB before 96 bits maximum value of sectors: jdow - 29.06.18, 11:32: > On 20180629 01:42, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > Hi Geert, > > > > Am 28.06.18 um 21:25 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven: > Do we really need the

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

Hi Michael. Michael Schmitz - 29.06.18, 11:07: > > But it's up to the person (which is not Linux) formatting the disk > > to > > not try to use > > it on systems that cannot handle it, and may destroy it. > > > >>> Let me clarify: what exactly would the kernel option allow? When > >>> to use

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

Hi, Geert Uytterhoeven - 29.06.18, 10:51: > On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 10:43 AM Michael Schmitz wrote: > > Am 28.06.18 um 21:25 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven: > > >>> Do we really need the warning? > > >>> Once the parsing is fixed doing 64-bit math, it does not matter > > >>> for > > >>> Linux

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

Hi Michael. Michael Schmitz - 29.06.18, 10:42: > Am 28.06.18 um 21:25 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven: > >>> Do we really need the warning? > >>> Once the parsing is fixed doing 64-bit math, it does not matter > >>> for > >>> Linux anymore. > >> > >> Well, irony of this is: In my case the RDB has

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

On Jun 29 2018, Michael Schmitz wrote: > Would MSDOS recognize the GPT partition as 'probably FAT', and attempt > to use it? GPT has the concept of a protective MBR which should prevent such errors. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

On 20180629 01:42, Michael Schmitz wrote: Hi Geert, Am 28.06.18 um 21:25 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven: Do we really need the warning? Once the parsing is fixed doing 64-bit math, it does not matter for Linux anymore. Well, irony of this is: In my case the RDB has been created on a machine

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

Hi Geert, Am 29.06.18 um 21:12 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven: > Hi Michael, > > On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 11:08 AM Michael Schmitz wrote: >> Am 29.06.18 um 20:51 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven: Would MSDOS recognize the GPT partition as 'probably FAT', and attempt to use it? >>> No idea... >>>

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

Hi Geert, Am 29.06.18 um 21:10 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven: > >> The question is - can writes to the disk cause any damage to data on the >> disk, as seen by old OS versions? If the answer is no, we won't need the >> option after all. > You mean someone relying on the parameters of his RDB to

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

Hi Michael, On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 11:08 AM Michael Schmitz wrote: > Am 29.06.18 um 20:51 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven: > >> Would MSDOS recognize the GPT partition as 'probably FAT', and attempt > >> to use it? > > No idea... > > > > Probably some old Windows or MacOS versions will just suggest

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

Hi Geert, Am 28.06.18 um 01:30 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven: > Hi Michael, > > Thanks for your patch! > > On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 4:47 AM wrote: >> From 5299e0e64dfb33ac3a1f3137b42178734ce20087 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > ?? > >> The Amiga RDB partition parser module uses int for partition sector

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

Hi Michael, On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 10:58 AM Michael Schmitz wrote: > Am 28.06.18 um 18:45 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven: > > On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 6:59 AM Michael Schmitz > > wrote: > >> Am 28.06.2018 um 09:20 schrieb Martin Steigerwald: > > And as stated in my other reply to the patch: >

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

Hi Geert, Am 29.06.18 um 20:51 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven: > Hi Michael, > >> Would MSDOS recognize the GPT partition as 'probably FAT', and attempt >> to use it? > No idea... > > Probably some old Windows or MacOS versions will just suggest to > format your "new" disk ;-) Yep, that's what I'd

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

Hi Geert, Am 28.06.18 um 18:45 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven: > Hi Michael, > > On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 6:59 AM Michael Schmitz wrote: >> Am 28.06.2018 um 09:20 schrieb Martin Steigerwald: > And as stated in my other reply to the patch: > partition needs 64 bit disk device support in

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

Hi Michael, On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 10:43 AM Michael Schmitz wrote: > Am 28.06.18 um 21:25 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven: > >>> Do we really need the warning? > >>> Once the parsing is fixed doing 64-bit math, it does not matter for > >>> Linux anymore. > >> Well, irony of this is: In my case the

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

Hi Geert, Am 28.06.18 um 21:25 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven: > >>> Do we really need the warning? >>> Once the parsing is fixed doing 64-bit math, it does not matter for >>> Linux anymore. >> Well, irony of this is: In my case the RDB has been created on a machine >> with a native OS. So Linux

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

On 20180628 00:39, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: Hi Martin, On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 9:29 AM Martin Steigerwald wrote: Michael Schmitz - 28.06.18, 06:58: […] In the interest of least surprises, we have to fix the 32 bit overflow (so we can even detect that it would have happened), and give the

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

Hi Joanne, On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 11:20 AM jdow wrote: > On 20180627 23:45, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 6:59 AM Michael Schmitz > > wrote: > >> Am 28.06.2018 um 09:20 schrieb Martin Steigerwald: > > And as stated in my other reply to the patch: > > partition

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

Hi Martin, On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 9:13 AM Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Geert Uytterhoeven - 28.06.18, 08:45: > > On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 6:59 AM Michael Schmitz > wrote: > > > Am 28.06.2018 um 09:20 schrieb Martin Steigerwald: > > > >>> And as stated in my other reply to the patch: > > > >>>

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

On 20180627 23:45, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: Hi Michael, On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 6:59 AM Michael Schmitz wrote: Am 28.06.2018 um 09:20 schrieb Martin Steigerwald: And as stated in my other reply to the patch: partition needs 64 bit disk device support in AmigaOS or AmigaOS like operating

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

Hi Martin, On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 9:29 AM Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Michael Schmitz - 28.06.18, 06:58: > […] > > >> In the interest of least surprises, we have to fix the 32 bit > > >> overflow (so we can even detect that it would have happened), and > > >> give the user the chance to

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

Hi Michael. Probably I was right with not submitting a patch myself. I´d likely would have been overwhelmed by the discussion and feedback :) Michael Schmitz - 28.06.18, 06:58: […] > >> In the interest of least surprises, we have to fix the 32 bit > >> overflow (so we can even detect that it

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

Hi Geert. Geert Uytterhoeven - 28.06.18, 08:45: > On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 6:59 AM Michael Schmitz wrote: > > Am 28.06.2018 um 09:20 schrieb Martin Steigerwald: > > >>> And as stated in my other reply to the patch: > > >>> partition needs 64 bit disk device support in AmigaOS or AmigaOS > > >>>

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

Hi Michael, On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 6:59 AM Michael Schmitz wrote: > Am 28.06.2018 um 09:20 schrieb Martin Steigerwald: > >>> And as stated in my other reply to the patch: > >>> partition needs 64 bit disk device support in AmigaOS or AmigaOS > >>> like > >>> operating systems (NSD64, TD64 or

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

Hi Martin, Am 28.06.2018 um 09:20 schrieb Martin Steigerwald: And as stated in my other reply to the patch: partition needs 64 bit disk device support in AmigaOS or AmigaOS like operating systems (NSD64, TD64 or SCSI direct) I'd probably leave it at 'disk needs 64 bit disk device support on

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

Warning: RDB partition 32-bit overflow AmigaOS developers can do 64 bit math on a 32 bit operating system. Just like Linux can. Yes, I realize that. I hadn't gone back through all the mails on the subject to find out what the exact requrements are on the AmigaOS side. Just trying to be as ter

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

Error : Conventional RDBs cannot define more than 4,294,967,296 blocks. or Error : Conventional RDB block count overflow. That is a HARD limit. The documentation for error should suggest larger logical block (cluster, whatever) sizes as a way out. Of course, block size "could" go

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

Three issues exist here in two different places. As far as a 32 TG disk is concerned RDBs can describe it and mount it safely - sort of - modulo the following issues. They are not a problem, I believe, with Amiga OSs new enough to understand RDBs. I cannot prove that. They are not sufficient,

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

; > > > Warning: RDB partition 32-bit overflow > > > > AmigaOS developers can do 64 bit math on a 32 bit operating system. > > Just like Linux can. > > Yes, I realize that. I hadn't gone back through all the mails on the > subject to find out what t

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

Hi Geert, thanks for your feedback! On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 1:30 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Thanks for your patch! > > On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 4:47 AM wrote: >> From 5299e0e64dfb33ac3a1f3137b42178734ce20087 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > ?? Comes from not using git

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

lopers can do 64 bit math on a 32 bit operating system. Just > like Linux can. Yes, I realize that. I hadn't gone back through all the mails on the subject to find out what the exact requrements are on the AmigaOS side. Just trying to be as terse as possible to keep checkpatch happy :-(

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

Hi Michael, Thanks for your patch! On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 4:47 AM wrote: > From 5299e0e64dfb33ac3a1f3137b42178734ce20087 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 ?? > The Amiga RDB partition parser module uses int for partition sector > address and count, which will overflow for disks 2 TB and larger. > >

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

Thanks a lot again for your patch. schmitz...@gmail.com - 27.06.18, 03:24: > + if (start_sect > INT_MAX || nr_sects > INT_MAX > + || (start_sect + nr_sects) > INT_MAX) { > + pr_err("%s: Warning: RDB partition > overflow!\n", +

Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

schmitz...@gmail.com - 27.06.18, 03:24: > From 5299e0e64dfb33ac3a1f3137b42178734ce20087 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > The Amiga RDB partition parser module uses int for partition sector > address and count, which will overflow for disks 2 TB and larger. > > Use sector_t as type for sector address

Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

>From 5299e0e64dfb33ac3a1f3137b42178734ce20087 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 The Amiga RDB partition parser module uses int for partition sector address and count, which will overflow for disks 2 TB and larger. Use sector_t as type for sector address and size (as expected by put_partition) to allow

[no subject]

inux-xtensa.org Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org Subject: [RFC] common non-cache coherent direct dma mapping ops Hi all, this series continues consolidating the dma-mapping code, with a focus on architectures that do not (always) provide cache coherence for DMA. Three architectures (arm, mips and

[no subject]

I am Ms.Ella Golan, I am the Executive Vice President Banking Division with FIRST INTERNATIONAL BANK OF ISRAEL LTD (FIBI). I am getting in touch with you regarding an extremely important and urgent matter. If you would oblige me the opportunity, I shall provide you with details upon your response.

[no subject]

I am Ms.Ella Golan, I am the Executive Vice President Banking Division with FIRST INTERNATIONAL BANK OF ISRAEL LTD (FIBI). I am getting in touch with you regarding an extremely important and urgent matter. If you would oblige me the opportunity, I shall provide you with details upon your

[no subject]

Hi, I am Barrister Daven Bango, Can i trust and cooperate with you in an international transaction? I look forward to your urgent response in my email (bar.davenba...@gmail.com) Thanks. Best regards, Barrister Daven Bango skype: bardaven01 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

[no subject]

Hello, I am General Lori J. Robinson, I am presently in Afghanistan serving the UN/NATO military assignment here,i have an important discussion with you kindly respond to me through my private box lori_robinson@hotmail.com so that we can know ourselves better. I hope to read from you if

[no subject]

Folks, I apologize for the goof ups. I know accepting newbie patches must be annoying. If it's any consolation I'm trying hard to learn the ropes with a simple patches so I can contribute more substantial stuff later. Thanks, Gideon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

[no subject]

> -header-y += msr-index.h I see it on my desktop as /usr/include/asm/msr-index.h and it's been there at least four years - and as such it's part of the UAPI. I don't think you can remove it unless you can guarantee there are no userspace users. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the

[no subject]

Nicolas Dichtel wrote: > This header file is exported, thus move it to uapi. Exported how? > +#ifdef __INT32_TYPE__ > +#undef __INT32_TYPE__ > +#define __INT32_TYPE__ int > +#endif > + > +#ifdef __UINT32_TYPE__ > +#undef __UINT32_TYPE__ > +#define

[no subject]

Proposal, Respond to my personal email; mrs.zhangxiao1962@outlook. com Yours Sincerely. Mrs. Zhang Xiao (Accounts book Keeper) Angang Steel Company Limited 396 Nan Zhong Hua Lu, Tie Dong District Anshan, Liaoning 114021, China. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe

[no subject]

hallo, Ich bin Mr.Morgan Ich habe eine sensible und vertrauliche Geschäfts wert 12 Millionen Pfund, die wir nutzen die uns beide ich will auf meiner privaten E-Mail geben die details.contact mich (morganan...@hotmail.com)-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-m68k in

[no subject]

Sehr geehrte Begünstigte, Sie haben als einzige Begünstigte der Summe von fünfhunderttausend Euro (€ 500.000,00 Euro), die hier in WESTERN UNION OFFICE von der ONU Organisation für Sie hinterlegt ausgewählt wurde. Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns für Ansprüche Email: wes_sp...@outlook.com

[no subject]

Sehr geehrte Begünstigte, Sie haben als einzige Begünstigte der Summe von fünfhunderttausend Euro (€ 500.000,00 Euro), die hier in WESTERN UNION OFFICE von der ONU Organisation für Sie hinterlegt ausgewählt wurde. Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns für Ansprüche Email: wes_sp...@outlook.com

[no subject]

:42 +1300 Subject: [PATCH] m68k/atari: EtherNEC - ethernet support (ne) Support for Atari EtherNEC ROM port adapters in ne.c Signed-off-by: Michael Schmitz schm...@debian.org Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org --- drivers/net/ethernet/8390/Kconfig |3 ++- drivers/net

(no subject)

Achtung: Komfortable direkte Kredit-Angebot! Wir bieten dringend Kredite / Finanzierung zu einem sehr niedrigen Zinssatz von 4%. Unser Hauptziel beinhaltet die Bereitstellung Personen mit Mikrofinanz-Darlehen. Wir sind bestrebt, unsere Kunden zufrieden zu stellen und hier einige wichtige

[no subject]

Bestauml;tigen Sie Ihre 500,000,00 Euro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-m68k in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[no subject]

Claim your 500,000,00 Euros -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-m68k in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[no subject]

Optimieren Sie Ihren 500,000,00 Euro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-m68k in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[no subject]

Optimieren Sie Ihren 500,000,00 Euro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-m68k in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[no subject]

is prohibited. This information is the same as any written document and may be subject to all rules governing public information according to Florida Statutes. Any message that falls under Chapter 119 shall not be altered in a manner that misrepresents the activities of Orange County Public Schools

[no subject]

Your email as been awarded sum of 500,000.00 GBP as charity Compensation from Qatar Foundation,contact( morgananderso...@sbcglobal.net) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-m68k in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at

[no subject]

Congratulation !! Confirm your 500,000,00 Euros. Contact claims office via : claimsoffic...@yeah.net -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-m68k in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[no subject]

Do You Need A Loan? Email Us Now At jerrysmit...@rediffmail.com With Amount Needed As Loan And Phone Number. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-m68k in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at

[no subject]

Loan Syndicacion Am AFG Guaranty Trust Bank, zu strukturieren wir Kreditlinien treffen Sie unsere Kunden spezifischen geschäftlichen Anforderungen und einen deutlichen Mehrwert für unsere Kunden Unternehmen. eine Division der AFG Finance und Private Bank plc. Wenn Sie erwägen, eine große

[no subject]

Hello Geert, This series of patches updates Atari EtherNAT and EtherNEC network support, plus adds USB driver support for the ISP1160 chip found on EtherNAT and NetUSBee adapters. It is meant to apply on top of your m68k-queue or master branches. Expect a merge conflict in #4 (the EtherNAT

[no subject]

From 72cce075197cce09678b28f9ee7232549e3e8b9b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Schmitz schm...@debian.org Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 15:11:16 +1200 Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [m68k] Atari: increase number of Atari interrupt sources for EtherNAT Signed-off-by: Michael Schmitz schm...@debian.org

[no subject]

From faba34dd8edb81af0b93ca4e9d5fc00f97016281 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Schmitz schm...@debian.org Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 15:16:40 +1200 Subject: [PATCH 2/6] [m68k] Atari: correct EtherNAT 91C111 interrupt, conditionalize platform device register Signed-off-by: Michael Schmitz schm

[no subject]

From 49748d8106827ed5480dbca37221d5b2e0da8194 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Schmitz schm...@debian.org Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 15:19:28 +1200 Subject: [PATCH 3/6] [m68k] Atari: add machine specific register access macros in smc91x.h Signed-off-by: Michael Schmitz schm...@debian.org

[no subject]

From 1fe03815ff360ebec29fe6d66b5a1d8659e3a95d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Schmitz schm...@debian.org Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 15:22:13 +1200 Subject: [PATCH 4/6] [m68k] Atari: add Kconfig support for EtherNAT - smc91x.c driver Signed-off-by: Michael Schmitz schm...@debian.org --- arch

[no subject]

From 48d2284d03e6b254207b03765b9f636d8126c857 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Schmitz schm...@debian.org Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 15:25:59 +1200 Subject: [PATCH 5/6] [m68k] Atari: add platform support for EtherNEC - ne.c driver Signed-off-by: Michael Schmitz schm...@debian.org --- arch

[no subject]

Do you need a loan? Вам нужен кредит?

[no subject]

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org --- arch/m68k/include/asm/unistd.h |5 - arch/m68k/kernel/entry.S |3 +++ arch/m68knommu/kernel/syscalltable.S |3 +++ 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git

Subject: [PATCH 1/1] m68k Mac II ADB fixes

Fix a crash caused by requests placed in the queue with the completed flag already set. This lead to some ADB_SYNC requests returning early and their request structs being popped off the stack while still queued. Stack corruption ensued or an invalid request callback pointer was invoked or

Re: Subject: [PATCH 1/1] m68k Mac II ADB fixes

On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, I wrote: On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, I wrote: + * The syntax of the ADB status lines seems to be totally different on MacII, + * though. MacII uses the states Command - Even - Odd - Even -...- Idle + * for sending and Idle - Even - Odd - Even -...- Idle for