> Then change patch granularity: one patch per subsystem or per
> directory (e. g. pci, usb, platform, others).
I imagine that the risks for disagreements can grow with such
a bigger scope.
> That's the usual criteria most maintainers use for cleanups.
I picked some update candidates up where t
Em Sat, 23 Sep 2017 16:43:53 +0200
SF Markus Elfring escreveu:
> >> coccinelle, checkpatch, coverity, etc.
> …
> > It **really** doesn't makes any sense to send patch bombs like that!
>
> I got an other impression for this software development aspect.
>
>
> > That pisses me off, as it requ
>> coccinelle, checkpatch, coverity, etc.
…
> It **really** doesn't makes any sense to send patch bombs like that!
I got an other impression for this software development aspect.
> That pisses me off, as it requires a considerable amount of time from
> my side that could be used handling importa
Em Fri, 8 Sep 2017 16:34:56 +0200
Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> coccinelle, checkpatch, coverity, etc. etc.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
> The following changes since commit 1efdf1776e2253b77413c997bed862410e4b6aaf:
>
> media: leds: as3645a: add V4L2_FLASH_LED_CLASS dependency (2017-09-05
> 16
coccinelle, checkpatch, coverity, etc. etc.
Regards,
Hans
The following changes since commit 1efdf1776e2253b77413c997bed862410e4b6aaf:
media: leds: as3645a: add V4L2_FLASH_LED_CLASS dependency (2017-09-05
16:32:45 -0400)
are available in the git repository at:
git://linuxtv.org/h
