On 2011-10-14 17:43, Enrico wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Gary Thomas wrote:
For days, I've been chasing ghosts :-) I know they are still there,
but I think they are more a function of the source than the ISP setup.
So, I went looking for a better source, NTSC in my case. My choice
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 1:23 AM, Gary Thomas wrote:
> To be clear, moving from film to video, there would be no change of data
> within a single frame between the two interleaved halves. I'm sure this
> was even true of old cameras, which were not digital capture devices being
> used to send inte
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Gary Thomas wrote:
> For days, I've been chasing ghosts :-) I know they are still there,
> but I think they are more a function of the source than the ISP setup.
> So, I went looking for a better source, NTSC in my case. My choice is
> is a DVD player with known
On 2011-10-14 17:07, Gary Thomas wrote:
For days, I've been chasing ghosts :-) I know they are still there,
but I think they are more a function of the source than the ISP setup.
So, I went looking for a better source, NTSC in my case. My choice is
is a DVD player with known good video (I'm convi
For days, I've been chasing ghosts :-) I know they are still there,
but I think they are more a function of the source than the ISP setup.
So, I went looking for a better source, NTSC in my case. My choice is
is a DVD player with known good video (I'm convinced that my cheap NTSC
camera produces
